I don't understand why the US constitution is weirdly revered by people in this country. It was fairly forward thinking for its time... but it was written almost 250 years ago. I think it's safe to say the world has changed pretty dramatically over the course of a quarter of a millennium.
You change the laws through the Constitutional process. Period. Otherwise, you are arguing for revolution, and that only involves violence of some sort. If you want things to get really bloody, then revolution is what you want. And guess what? A bunch of people are willing to fight you to the death over it.
Agreed 1000%. For starters, in regards to the Second Amendment, bullets weren't even invented until approximately 50yrs after it was written. All they had was muskets lol.
The Constitution can be amended. It can be changed through a Constitutionally legal process, therefore there is no need for a new constitution. If there is a political will for change, it can be done.
Stop and think what might go wrong if we were to throw away to constitution. Are you so sure you will get what you want in a new constitution? Stop for a moment and do a risk/reward analysis on that one.
Even though our constitution isn't perfect, I would hate to think what kind of constitution present day politicians would come up with. It would definitely be worse than the constitution we have now.
The US constitution is the second oldest one after Belgium. Now we are living in the 21st century. There needs to be a new one but usually that only happens with a bigger historic event. Maybe that's what Tucker Carlson is going for?
I don't know why it's controversial to have liberals leave the country permanently. They clearly hate the USA. Everyone would be better off. Common sense to me.
Do you have an outline of this new Constitution you want?
One reason it may be controversial to suggest the US needs a new Constitution is because the half-wits like yourself suggesting the need for a new one, have no idea what the new one should say that the current one doesn't.
I would guess the average IQ of politicians today is at least 30 points lower than the "founding fathers" (whatever that means). Not that they were geniuses, but narcissism and extraversion are probably the main predictors of political involvement today.
So who exactly would be making this constitution? That's the question.
I think the people who think a new constitution would be something they 100% agree with.
The constitution has a process for amending it and has been numerous times. The Constitution also provides for a way to legislate to adapt to changing times.
Let's take the Second Amendment since it has a lot of controversy. If you cannot get it amended then how do you expect to get an entire new constitution approved?
Also from a practical matter how would a completely new constitution be adopted? A majority of a popular vote?