People should be outraged by corruption on both sides as well as attempts to diminish or silence the voice of opposition. Instead, they either point fingers at eachother or ignore it and say it doesn't matter.
Yeah, Kushner shouldn't be doing that. But that's covered on every news station and everyone knows about it. If Trump runs for president again, Kushner's overseas activity will factor in people's decision to vote for Trump or not vote for Trump.
The Hunter Biden laptop info was REMOVED from ALL social media. If you don't watch Fox News, you wouldn't know about it. Polls have shown that 17% of Biden voters would not have voted for him had they known about Hunter Biden's laptop. I'm saying let all the positive and negative info for each candidate be fully out there. Then vote factoring everything.
Democrats are crying about Musk buying twitter, saying it will end democracy. They are saying that Musk can just suppress political candidates that he doesn't like, and prop up candidates that they support. THAT ALREADY HAPPENED AGAINST TRUMP IN 2020, AND THUS ALREADY DAMAGED DEMOCRACY.
Bernie would have won in 2020 if big tech and MSM didnt' sabotage Bernie and prop up Biden. We would have had free health care and all student loan debt by now. Instead we have record inflation, a crappy economy, and Americans can't afford basic healthcare.
Hillary Clinton’s team fabricated the Russian collusion hoax, paid a literal Russian agent to spread it, lied to the FBI about it, which then lied to federal courts about it so Obama could spy on Trump’s team. It’s far and away the worst political scandal in U.S. history.
If her emails were "nothing" why did she go to such extreme ends to hide them from the public, even after been subpoenaed to hand them over? Clearly she knew they weren't "nothing" and she was desperate to keep a lid on her murky dealings.
Because many of them were private. Why aren’t all politicians required to release private emails? There could be many that had nothing to do with politics, classified information or murky dealings but would still be embarrassing. You wouldn’t want your personal correspondence released to the public.
If her emails were "nothing" why did she go to such extreme ends to hide them from the public, even after been subpoenaed to hand them over? Clearly she knew they weren't "nothing" and she was desperate to keep a lid on her murky dealings.
Because many of them were private. Why aren’t all politicians required to release private emails? There could be many that had nothing to do with politics, classified information or murky dealings but would still be embarrassing. You wouldn’t want your personal correspondence released to the public.
That's why government officials have GOVERNMENT e-mail accounts. She had a private server and a private e-mail account which she used in her official duties as Secretary of State.
She deleted 33,000 emails. You are saying she received 33,000 private emails in 4 years as secretary of state? She hit used bleach bit and hit computer devices with hammers to protect private emails about her daughter's wedding?
FBI Director James Comey spoke to reporters about Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while serving as secretary of state. He said that although ...
Disinformation Governance Board?!? Wait what??? Biden is going to openly admit that not only the truth needs to be squashed, but let's openly violate free speech? Tell me this is a joke?
So funny how obsessed conservatives are with Hunter Biden's laptop! They really need something constructive to work on! lol
The president being corrupt for 40+ years is relevant.
Democrats spent 4 years wetting the bed over the fake Russian collusion story...
If Trump Jr. was a crack addict who had a laptop with all of Trump's criminal receipts on it you would be demanding the world stop spinning until it was all made public.
Yeah, Kushner shouldn't be doing that. But that's covered on every news station and everyone knows about it. If Trump runs for president again, Kushner's overseas activity will factor in people's decision to vote for Trump or not vote for Trump.
The Hunter Biden laptop info was REMOVED from ALL social media. If you don't watch Fox News, you wouldn't know about it. Polls have shown that 17% of Biden voters would not have voted for him had they known about Hunter Biden's laptop. I'm saying let all the positive and negative info for each candidate be fully out there. Then vote factoring everything.
Democrats are crying about Musk buying twitter, saying it will end democracy. They are saying that Musk can just suppress political candidates that he doesn't like, and prop up candidates that they support. THAT ALREADY HAPPENED AGAINST TRUMP IN 2020, AND THUS ALREADY DAMAGED DEMOCRACY.
Bernie would have won in 2020 if big tech and MSM didnt' sabotage Bernie and prop up Biden. We would have had free health care and all student loan debt by now. Instead we have record inflation, a crappy economy, and Americans can't afford basic healthcare.
The Biden laptop was the biggest story for like 2 weeks before the election what are you talking about?
Everyone heard of it. This is a terrible example of censorship and a great example that trying to 'remove' things from the internet never works -- just amplifies it.
I simply cannot believe that people are pretending the Hunter story was 'scrubbed.'
Yeah, Kushner shouldn't be doing that. But that's covered on every news station and everyone knows about it. If Trump runs for president again, Kushner's overseas activity will factor in people's decision to vote for Trump or not vote for Trump.
The Hunter Biden laptop info was REMOVED from ALL social media. If you don't watch Fox News, you wouldn't know about it. Polls have shown that 17% of Biden voters would not have voted for him had they known about Hunter Biden's laptop. I'm saying let all the positive and negative info for each candidate be fully out there. Then vote factoring everything.
Democrats are crying about Musk buying twitter, saying it will end democracy. They are saying that Musk can just suppress political candidates that he doesn't like, and prop up candidates that they support. THAT ALREADY HAPPENED AGAINST TRUMP IN 2020, AND THUS ALREADY DAMAGED DEMOCRACY.
Bernie would have won in 2020 if big tech and MSM didnt' sabotage Bernie and prop up Biden. We would have had free health care and all student loan debt by now. Instead we have record inflation, a crappy economy, and Americans can't afford basic healthcare.
The Biden laptop was the biggest story for like 2 weeks before the election what are you talking about?
Everyone heard of it. This is a terrible example of censorship and a great example that trying to 'remove' things from the internet never works -- just amplifies it.
I simply cannot believe that people are pretending the Hunter story was 'scrubbed.'
The "story" was that it was fake Russian disinformation.
The Biden laptop was the biggest story for like 2 weeks before the election what are you talking about?
Everyone heard of it. This is a terrible example of censorship and a great example that trying to 'remove' things from the internet never works -- just amplifies it.
I simply cannot believe that people are pretending the Hunter story was 'scrubbed.'
The "story" was that it was fake Russian disinformation.
Why are you always so dishonest?
Was it? Sounds like plenty of new sources were reporting multiple opinions about it. You clearly were able to find information that fit your political dogmas.
Sorry guys, a news story that was front page for days is a terrible example. Do better with your pearl clutching.
Disinformation Governance Board?!? Wait what??? Biden is going to openly admit that not only the truth needs to be squashed, but let's openly violate free speech? Tell me this is a joke?
The "story" was that it was fake Russian disinformation.
Why are you always so dishonest?
Was it? Sounds like plenty of new sources were reporting multiple opinions about it. You clearly were able to find information that fit your political dogmas.
Sorry guys, a news story that was front page for days is a terrible example. Do better with your pearl clutching.
If it was mentioned on Twitter the user was banned.
If it was mentioned on YouTube the user was banned.
The MSM ignored the story after they declared it was fake.
Was it? Sounds like plenty of new sources were reporting multiple opinions about it. You clearly were able to find information that fit your political dogmas.
Sorry guys, a news story that was front page for days is a terrible example. Do better with your pearl clutching.
If it was mentioned on Twitter the user was banned.
If it was mentioned on YouTube the user was banned.
The MSM ignored the story after they declared it was fake.
You're either ignorant or you're lying.
I am not conservative but I heard out the story countless times during the 2 weeks it was in the cycle. From all political sides.