Since no one is talking about her, let's do it here. She just crushed it again. PR in 2:25. And she dropped Adidas just prior to the race to run in a shoe that works better with her feet. Thoughts?
-
422
-
Interesting listen, I'm glad she's finding success.
141 -
Amazing would be making the podium. Not beating Steph Bruce for 10th in a decent PR.
1272 -
Excellent.
Former NAU Lady Lumberjack!
201 -
She not run fast like Shalane.
657 -
Angelo Mysterioso wrote:
Excellent.
Former NAU Lady Lumberjack!
I not impress. Paula Radcliff is can run more fast then she.
663 -
Ric’s legacy lives on!
201 -
Wow, the bar is seriously low for American marathoners. I mean seriously you're blown away by Fischer 2:10 and Rojas 2:25? Lol for real? Thats like 30th best Americans and 100th best Kenyans/Ethiopians/Japanese. Next you'll be saying Parker Stinson is world class LOL.
1670 -
new fan of nell wrote:
Since no one is talking about her, let's do it here. She just crushed it again. PR in 2:25. And she dropped Adidas just prior to the race to run in a shoe that works better with her feet. Thoughts?
What shoes did she use?
161 -
Sour Grapes wrote:
Wow, the bar is seriously low for American marathoners. I mean seriously you're blown away by Fischer 2:10 and Rojas 2:25? Lol for real? Thats like 30th best Americans and 100th best Kenyans/Ethiopians/Japanese. Next you'll be saying Parker Stinson is world class LOL.
I bet it more fast then you can run.
1118 -
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
Sour Grapes wrote:
Wow, the bar is seriously low for American marathoners. I mean seriously you're blown away by Fischer 2:10 and Rojas 2:25? Lol for real? Thats like 30th best Americans and 100th best Kenyans/Ethiopians/Japanese. Next you'll be saying Parker Stinson is world class LOL.
I bet it more fast then you can run.
False. My track PRs equate to faster than those using iaaf scoring points.
But honestly, what a stupid, juvenile argument from someone who clearly doesn't watch sports. You can criticize professional athletes that you may not be able to beat in their sport by simply being a fan and using your brain. 2:10/2:25 are national/international class.
World Class/ "Amazing" = 2:06/2:21 MINIMUM in super shoes. Stop celebrating mediocrity.
1054 -
Did Nell announce dropping Adidas? Looks like Nike supershoes in the photos, and mixed brands for the rest of her kit.
190 -
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
Angelo Mysterioso wrote:
Excellent.
Former NAU Lady Lumberjack!
I not impress. Paula Radcliff is can run more fast then she.
Please learn English.
1317 -
She ran in Nike Alphaflys. Said that they work better for her feet, she really didn't like the Adidas shoes, and that no contract is worth not running at her best.
451 -
Sour Grapes wrote:
bartholomew_maxwell wrote:
I bet it more fast then you can run.
False. My track PRs equate to faster than those using iaaf scoring points.
But honestly, what a stupid, juvenile argument from someone who clearly doesn't watch sports. You can criticize professional athletes that you may not be able to beat in their sport by simply being a fan and using your brain. 2:10/2:25 are national/international class.
World Class/ "Amazing" = 2:06/2:21 MINIMUM in super shoes. Stop celebrating mediocrity.
Your track PRs are made up nonsense. Post links or it didn't happen.
204 -
Constantly delivering. There are so many spares these days without sponsors. Does Nell want too much money or are the other people just happy to get some shoes and gear to say they are sponsored?
53 -
She signed with Adidas after last year's Boston.
120 -
Look at her IG
90 -
Based on contracts I’ve managed she missed out on $5000+ today from a sponsor. Performance bonus tied to Top 10 at Boston and sun-2:26.
61 -
Three stripes and you are out wrote:
Look at her IG
She’s getting that Garmin & Waterfall Racing do-re-mi!
60
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.