Russia has already lost, no they won't be making a dent in Ukraine, nothing will change because of Russia.
Stupd idea to begin with, actually everything Russia has done is stupid.
Ukraine has this won, and it's totally obvious.
Let's review so you are up to date:
Ukraine neo-nazis and military went to the Donbas to ethnic cleanse unarmed civilians for 8 years only after November 24th 2013, not before.
UPA / nazi flag wielding Ukraine neo-nazis started the very first violence on November 24th 2013 which led to this 2022 war.
The Euromaidan is the reason for Ukraine neo-nazis murdering unarmed civilians in the Donbas and so it is also the reason for Russia's subsequent liberation of the Donbas to prevent Ukraine fascists from ethnic cleansing unarmed civilians further.
So everyone is 100% clear, the Ukraine government is the fascist state. Russia is the anti-fascist, just like WWII, when Russia beat the Nazis, after Ukraine’s UPA/OUN fascist groups joined with Nazis to kill unarmed civilians.
Search EuroMaidan to learn more.
About "it's totally obvious", go tell Russian troops in Ukraine they have lost and see what they say.
Russia was going to roll into Kyviv oust Mr. Z and after about a month be ruling all of Ukraine, that was the plan. Now how close are they to that happening?
Don't care about all this nazi BS all that matters is Russia will never rule Ukraine, that will never happen.
Ukraine is winnng this war, the Russians can't fight. Are you saying you haven't notice just how sad their army is? Hell, what did calling in that Wagner groupl tell you?
When this is over Russia would have accomplushed nothing other than become laughing stock. By then over 300,000 dead Russian troops, and they gained.......nothing.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
I am uninterested in who wins. Could care less about either side. I am interested in sharing the historical truths on events past and present (as much as that's possible)... like Russia presently winning as they are in Ukraine. Not my preference (no war) but the current reality.
On morality, have you: 1) gone to and ruined a peaceful protest by attacking police who were only standing there, while simultaneously brandishing a nazi-UPA flag? and 2) have you gone around an area outside your home region, after already ruining that peaceful protest, and then started killing unarmed minority civilians of that region for 8 years? Which minority would you target. Can you tell us?
This is your position. It's a losing position, morally.
Who knows militarily what will happen. Don't care. It's all garbage. If Ukraine didn't do/allow these things before, there'd be no war now.
How does billions to Ukraine help average americans in america? Because the bi-partisan military budget has turned america into a failed state.
We bring to the attention of Global Research Readers a video on the atrocities committed in Eastern Ukraine. The mainstream media is silent on the issue. The...
Not sure these equipment losses matter for either side, for the time being, as Ukraine can ask for more and Russia can make more. Troop numbers is much more important for both sides.
Not sure these equipment losses matter for either side, for the time being, as Ukraine can ask for more and Russia can make more. Troop numbers is much more important for both sides.
You are posting numbers supplied by the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. They are not even remotely credible. But it is further evidence that you believe even the most obvious Russian propaganda, which is why your understanding of this entire war is so detached from reality.
Russia was right about Ukraine neo-nazis ethnic cleansing first ("de-nazify") and about NATO agreement to not expand.
Russia is more credible, given their opposition tried to lie about their own NATO expansion agreement. Russia's opposition also stopped reporting on Ukraine's Nazi problem after Feb 2022, after reporting about it for 8 years straight. That's not credible. Trying to hide the moral low would be shame and omission of truth to brainwash sheeple like you. Russia didn't start the war either, which bolsters their cred more.
This is from 2018, before the truth blackout kicked in regarding Ukraine's nazi state problem:
“It’s particularly troubling that much of the Nazi glorification in Ukraine is government-supported.”
You have evidence that they’re not true? So do I. First, they claim to destroy more aircraft than Ukraine possesses (even after NATO+ countries have provided additional aircraft), but Ukraine is still flying helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. Second, the same source has reported that they’ve destroyed more than two times as many HIMARs systems as the US has supplied.
That you find them credible speaks volumes about you as a poster and you as a person. All you’ve done here is demonstrate that nobody should take you seriously (they didn’t before), and that your entire (mis)understanding of the war between Russia and Ukraine is based on Kremlin talking points.
Great. Confirm how many aircraft and HIMARS they actually had with sources (evidence). Not taking your word for it. You support neo-nazi war-starting Ukrainians, ethnic cleansing, racism, NATO lies, and media evasion.
Then I'll tell you these claims by both sides are worthless as Ukraine can just get more and Russia can just make more, as I already stated.
Stepan Bandera was a Ukrainian nationalist who joined forces with the German Nazis during World War II because he believed that they would help his country gain independence from the now defunct Soviet Union.
Great. Confirm how many aircraft and HIMARS they actually had with sources (evidence). Not taking your word for it. You support neo-nazi war-starting Ukrainians, ethnic cleansing, racism, NATO lies, and media evasion.
Then I'll tell you these claims by both sides are worthless as Ukraine can just get more and Russia can just make more, as I already stated.
Great. Confirm how many aircraft and HIMARS they actually had with sources (evidence). Not taking your word for it. You support neo-nazi war-starting Ukrainians, ethnic cleansing, racism, NATO lies, and media evasion.
Then I'll tell you these claims by both sides are worthless as Ukraine can just get more and Russia can just make more, as I already stated.
Ukraine. Across its eastern border is Russia and to its west-Europe. For centuries, it has been at the center of a tug-of-war between powers seeking to contr...
Your evidence is a carefully edited video that shows some nationalist flags, then later some clashes between police and protesters. It's not at all evident from what you showed that neo-Nazis started any violence. And, the person commentating is Vitaliy Zakharchenko, "a Ukrainian and Russian[5] politician who is a senior consultant at Russia's Rostec state corporation. He previously served as Ukraine's Minister of Internal Affairs[6][7] from 7 November 2011 until he was suspended from duties by the Ukrainian parliament on 21 February 2014[8] shortly after signing a decree authorizing the use of live ammunition against protesters.[citation needed] In that position, he was the head of the Ukrainian national police service, the Militsiya. The Council of the European Union sanctioned him effective 6 March 2014 for misuse of public funds and human rights violations (Decision 2014/119/CFSP), and the United States sanctioned him effective 22 December 2015 (81 FR 69190)."
So, I'm not going to believe a single word he says. But, thanks for playing! Here's your pine cone.
Oh look. Your source of "evidence" has already been thoroughly denounced. You didn't find evidence, you found propaganda. This is a recurring theme for you. Here's your pine cone.
Rod Dreher, writing for the American Conservative, gave this impression: "I expected 'Ukraine On Fire' to be propaganda, and indeed it was. But that doesn't mean it is entirely a lie, and in any case, it's important to know how the other side regards a conflict, if only to understand how they are likely thinking."[11] He confirmed that some NGO are in the political change business as seen personally observed in Hungary and argues against a black hat vs. white hat interpretation of the situation. According to his assessment, the argument by Mearsheimer and Kennan, that the West has pushed Ukraine and Russia towards an escalating crisis, needs some consideration (not full endorsement) in order to understand the complexity of the situation.
Andrew Roth, writing from Moscow for The Guardian, observed that Ukraine on Fire is part of "a series of documentary projects featuring Stone about Russia and Ukraine that reflect a strongly pro-Kremlin worldview", remarking further that "Stone has noted that the films, which are strongly critical of the 2014 maidan revolution and have been attacked as propaganda vehicles, are very popular in Russia."[12]
Stephen Velychenko [uk], University of Toronto's 'Chair of Ukrainian Studies', writer for Kyiv Post,[13] and author of several books on Ukrainian history, strongly criticized Stone's pro-Russian bias. He suggested to "peruse Karen Dawisha’s book Putin's Kleptocracy (2013) and some of Andrew Wilson’s and Timothy Snyder’s books on Ukraine". While Velychenko does not deny the possible involvement of the CIA and assesses that this is to be expected in normal international relations, he allocates only a minor role to them compared to domestic political forces and argues that the focus on external forces only will lead to apologetics or conspiracy theories.[14]
Antonio Armano, an Italian journalist covering Eastern Europe, criticized that the film does not mention either Stalin's dekulakization or the Holodomor,[15] a man-made famine organized by the Soviet regime[16][17] that killed millions of Ukrainians. These events may explain why the Nazi occupation during World War II was seen by some Ukrainians as welcomed liberation. Comparing Ukraine on Fire with the documentary Winter on Fire released one year earlier (and portrayed the 2014 revolution positively), he stated that Ukraine on Fire is a "less narrative and emotional" journalistic product, while Winter on Fire is "hagiographic, partial and a bit naïve", but manages to stay out of the realm of conspiracies. According to Armano, the main message of Ukraine on Fire is to avoid a new Cold War between the United States and Russia with the potential for nuclear confrontation.
James Kirchick of The Daily Beast called the documentary a "dictator suckup",[5] noting that "Yanukovych ceased being president on 22 February 2014 because he fled Kiev, rendering himself incapable of performing his presidential duties under the Ukrainian constitution. Over three-quarters of the country’s parliament, including many members of Yanukovych’s own party, voted effectively to impeach him that day", and "It is astoundingly patronizing for Stone to lecture Ukrainians—thousands of whom have fought and died defending their dismembered country from an all-out invasion by their much more powerful neighbor—about what they do and do not know about Viktor Yanukovych, Russia and the potential for a new Cold War".
Pavel Shekhtman, a Russian dissident wanted by Russian authorities on charges of extremism, also called the documentary "undistilled Kremlin propaganda", arguing among others that from the main Ukrainian political figures described as neo-Nazis by Oliver Stone, only Oleh Tyahnybok resorted to xenophobia and anti-Semitic rhetoric. Tyahnybok's ultranationalist party, Svoboda, subsequently lost most of their seats in the 2014 Ukrainian parliamentary election.[18]
Ukraine on Fire is a documentary film directed by Igor Lopatonok and premiered at the 2016 Taormina Film Fest. It features Oliver Stone, the executive producer, interviewing pro-Russian figures surrounding the 2014 Ukrainian...
This is a clip from our show SYSTEM UPDATE, now airing every weeknight at 7pm ET on Rumble. You can watch the full episode for FREE here: https://rumble.com/...
That darned video evidence! ...showing police being attacked first by Ukraine's neo-nazi side, wearing black masks, with UPS flags all around. UPA/nazi flags are seen everywhere in pictures and video evidence during that first week of the Euromaidan.
On November 24th 2013 The Guardian also confirmed the first violence was committed by your ethnic cleansing, racist, Ukraine neo-nazi side. They confirm Ukraine's neo-nazi side started the very first violence, which led to 8 years of neo-nazi ethnic cleansing, and ultimately this war:
"Tens of thousands of people held a peaceful meeting on European Square demanding Yanukovych abolish the decree and sack the government. But after the meeting, several hundred protesters rushed to the government headquarters demanding the government's resignation and that of the presidential administration. People threw smoke bombs and stones at police and shouted "Revolution!" Opposition politicians tried to calm the crowd but without success. The police responded by deploying teargas."
Of course we have evidence. Oryx counts Ukrainian losses as well based on photo/video evidence. The same source that shows Russia has verifiably lost 1900 tanks also shows that the number of Ukrainian losses claimed by Russia is massively fictionalized. Ukraine has lost 62 aircraft, not 404. 30 helicopters, not 226. And so on.
How can someone who posts so much know so little of the fundamental information about the topic, and where to find it?
These are trusted journalists. Glen Greenwald, Aaron mate, Max Blumenthal, Seymour Hersh. Thanks for the video link but no need to watch the problem fumble with the evidence. The evidence itself is enough.
The US got on the wrong side of history with this war, morally, and soon economically. The economic repercussions of NATO siding with a fascist state and the aggressor Ukraine, who invaded the Donbas before Russia, will last for decades. Just need Saudia to join BRICS or start using another currency for trade settlements with all its partners like it has started doing with Kenya. When the OPEC flood gate opens on boycotting the PetroTerrorismDollar, watch out. It's time to get more dominoes falling... humanity can't wait any longer.
The claim is, "Russia took out more equipment than Ukraine ever had" That evidence....
Then I'll tell you Ukraine effectively started this war on November 24th 2013, to which nothing else really matters. We wouldn't be here if it weren't for Ukraine's neo-nazi side attacking first, then killing its own after that.
This post was edited 6 minutes after it was posted.
