Official Covid Vaccine thread

This has to be a troll attempt, but have you ever read a grade 4 science textbook?

1) Thank you for spelling "Revelation" correctly--too many people put an "s" at the end.

2) Thanks for the laugh. "Bitchute"--HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

4 years and then straight to the camp right? :)

I could do with the discipline as you know...

But one thing I will say is this...I have a megaphone that I haven't unpacked from its box yet...it would be an error to think I won't use it. So f off with your lies. Most of the poor souls on this board are already gone with the vax and pcr ''test'' aka Mark in Forehead.

This board is a place for right wing evangelicals at this point.

Let me BLUF this post. (Bottom Line Up Front).

BLUF: Two more surveys... these done by Zogby... have found similar vaccine adverse effects to the 3 previous surveys I linked to earlier in this thread. They found that vaccine adverse effects are much higher than officially reported.

Links to the two surveys are at the bottom of the article linked to below. I suggest you peruse the actual survey responses since the article is unclear in spots. Here are some key points from the larger, all adults survey.

- 15% diagnosed with new condition after vaccination

- 10% of these new conditions are serious (i.e., 1.5% of all respondents reported a serious adverse effect)

- 10% had a flare up of a pre-existing condition

Ques 5: New conditions were MUCH HIGHER in the 18-29 and 30-49 cohorts. Normally, you would expect more new conditions in the older cohorts.

Q6: New conditions were a laundry list of conditions linked to the vaccines.

Q7: Flare ups of pre-existing conditions were MUCH HIGHER in the 18-29 and 30-49 cohorts.

Q16-18: Do you trust the CDC, FDA, Fauci? Yes: About 60%

Q19: Poorly worded question on ivermectin. Disregard it. The question asked about "pre-approved drugs such as ivermectin." Ivermectin was never approved for covid and has been effectively banned, yet the wording strongly implies that it was pre-approved for covid. Someone should have caught this before sending out the survey. Poorly worded questions are subject to reader interpretation of what the question is asking and that skews the results.

Q20: Have certain government agencies DELIBERATELY SUPPRESSED early treatments? Yes 46%. THIS IS HUGE. If these early treatments were deliberately suppressed, does it mean that the government was complicit in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people by deliberately suppressing early treatments that might have saved those lives? The FLCCC would say yes. I would say yes. Future surveys should ask follow-up questions on this point.

We now have five surveys that all indicate that vaccine adverse effects are much higher than officially reported. (Note: The second survey was conducted on the 18-49 cohort only. The results in 18-49 were similar to the 18-49 cohort in the first survey that included older cohorts.)

I mined the data in both surveys for more specifics, the odds of a life threatening condition were 1 in 655. The odds of a severe and continuing adverse effect were 1 in 93.

The first five surveys included 1,500 people. These two Zogby surveys included 1,967 people. Several of the questions were different between Zogby and the first three surveys, but the similar questions received similar responses.

childrenshealthdefense.org

15% of American Adults Diagnosed With New Condition After COVID Vaccine, Zogby Survey Finds

@ChildrensHD

More than two years after Operation Warp Speed began, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) commissioned John Zogby Strategies to conduct two surveys about attitudes and the overall health of American adults.

Link:childrenshealthdefense.org/press-relea...

This video is 90-something minutes long. I will listen to it... never.

lol

Mr. antivaxxers killing democracy. You need serious help as this thread and your futile attempts to get others to agree with you is to an obsessed level that is more unhealthy than the Virus itself.

You took the shots and the boosters, live your life. All is well with Covid unless you want to believe everything that your flavor posts, which in and of itself is bizarre, really bizarre. You are strange dude.

Hope this is the first of many. F_@# the vax mob mafia.

arlingtoncardinal.com

First COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Lawsuit Settlement for Health-Care Workers Is Over $10 Million

Cardinal News

By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor (The Center Square) – The first settlement in the U.S. has been reached in a class action lawsuit filed by health care workers over a university system’s COVID-19 vaccine ma...

Link:www.arlingtoncardinal.com/2022/07/firs...

Thoughts?

I know those who can't accept their cognitive dissonance will disregard this extremely thorough presentation making a case against virology as a whole by saying something like "Bitchute....hahahahah." That's your loss.

This is for those interested and open enough to take in a different perspective. It's quite an interesting take. I'm not saying it right or wrong, just interesting.

bitchute.com

DEBUNKING THE NONSENSE PRESENTATION | MIRROR

mckenzie123456789

MIRRORED : HealthFreedomforHumanity July 21st, 2022. SOURCE : https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z6chB1QtMFXh/ Alex Zeck https://besovereign.com/users/alec-zeck https://aleczeck.substack.com/ https://thewayfwrd.com/ htt…

Link:www.bitchute.com/video/OWy0dVFvrMVE/

Dan thanks 🙏 for posting this!!

🖕to my former hospital that fired me over this.

No, he's hilarious b/c he triggers angry antivaxxers so well.

Viruses are real. It's great that the truly whacko anti-science types are now posting in line with other anti-vaxxers. It makes the whole group easier to dismiss!

Anyone dumb enough to avoid the COVID vax is a net risk for patients at a hospital, regardless of their role.

Hippocratic oath says they must fire dumb people when they recognize them, sorry.

Anyone dumb enough to take two outdated vaccines, two boosters, and a course of Paxlovid after testing positive for the virus, only to test positive again is a net risk for patients at a hospital, regardless of their role. Vaxxed or unvaxxed, unless they are testing everyone all the time, is a “risk.”

The lawsuit was in regard to the hospital network's failure to consider religious exemptions to their vaccine policy. Since the case was settled, the interesting question of how to reconcile public health with religious freedom wasn't addressed.

The case doesn't really say anything either way about whether the policy was sensible from a strictly health perspective.

I'm afraid you're mistaking "science" for religious dogma. You wouldn't know "science" if it punched you in the face, science welcomes being challenged, it never responds with "X is/are real. But is great you doubt X, makes it easier to dismiss the whole group who doubt the safety and effectiveness of Thalidomide."