casual obsever wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
Assuming other androgens are relevant, it raises the question, which reported androgen levels Prof McGlone is talking about (apparently not nandrolone), and how elevated her reported androgen levels were (I don’t see that in the report).
You also can't keep your story straight. When I brought that up on 11-22, you started trolling …
I can’t keep my story straight?
Maybe it made sense to you, but I didn’t understand the relevance of other androgens, and still don’t.
I asked then what is the significance, and today, I don’t know the answer to that question.
The goal of the Houlihan camp was to explain the source of the presence of nandrolone, not rebut a report about speculated concentrations of other androgens based on assumptions that intact boar in the commercial pork market can only be cryptorchids, and they can only be at most six-months old.