When recapping the XC winner Whittni, LRC notes she set course record. On instagram stories, Quigley humblebragged that while the girls ran great, she still had the course record.
Well?
When recapping the XC winner Whittni, LRC notes she set course record. On instagram stories, Quigley humblebragged that while the girls ran great, she still had the course record.
Well?
Colleen who?
Artie Lange wrote:
When recapping the XC winner Whittni, LRC notes she set course record. On instagram stories, Quigley humblebragged that while the girls ran great, she still had the course record.
Well?
If true, why would this be "humblebragging" rather than just regular bragging?
CQ is obnoxious but correct. 19:17 at NCAA regionals in 2014: https://seminoles.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/ARP-Top-10-Times-1.pdf
Why should that be obnoxious? She rightly made correction. Fact
This is not any kind of bragging. This is just correcting a fact. Nothing more.
If you had a course record and someone ran slower on the course, and I then told you they set the course record, wouldn't YOU have the right to correct me without being accused of bragging?
dunbanned wrote:
Why should that be obnoxious? She rightly made correction. Fact
Just like the mainstream news media or better yet the fake news media, she was not letting them make up a story that is not true. Good for you Colleen!!!!!
Quigley is right. We will correct article
Colleen is right. I wrote that line of the article and was looking at the open CR and not the collegiate CR. We regret the error.
wejo wrote:
Quigley is right. We will correct article
We have withdrawn our correction. Quigley ran 19:17 on the original course which was always marketed as being 5.875 km, not 6 km. It's been confirmed to use that the course they ran yesterday has been lengthened to the full 6km. At Quigley's pace, it would have taken her 24.6 seconds to run the extra 125 meters.
https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=10971657Oooo this is getting fun.
Lenny Leonard wrote:
Oooo this is getting fun.
Definitely can't be solved without appropriate photos!
Typical Gault half assed work.
dunbanned wrote:
Why should that be obnoxious? She rightly made correction. Fact
+1.
She is correct and right to correct them.
Fake news LRC.
This post was removed.
wejo wrote:
Quigley is right. We will correct article
Wejo and Gault admit the mistake with a degree of decency and humility.
Rojo digs in further on the lie, how predictable 😂
jamb innn wrote:
Course record more like intercourse record
Not something you’ll have worry about buddy.
#incel4eva
rojo wrote:
wejo wrote:
Quigley is right. We will correct article
We have withdrawn our correction. Quigley ran 19:17 on the original course which was always marketed as being 5.875 km, not 6 km. It's been confirmed to use that the course they ran yesterday has been lengthened to the full 6km. At Quigley's pace, it would have taken her 24.6 seconds to run the extra 125 meters.
https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=10971657
Rojo, you're an idiot. STFU already
Lets Run Snobs Have No Self Awareness wrote:
wejo wrote:
Quigley is right. We will correct article
Wejo and Gault admit the mistake with a degree of decency and humility.
Rojo digs in further on the lie, how predictable 😂
Not sure what you are talking about. Robert's correction is accurate. Colleen Quigley is not the 6km course record holder.
Our original article was correct.
When Jon and I said we were making a correction we were mistaken about the course Colleen ran being shorter.