It depends on the individual. If you were pushing mileage and intensity hard with little recovery prior to injury, the first 3-5 days will probably leave you noticeably stronger than you were. In other words, absolutely no effective loss, after a day or two back.
On the other hand, if you were in a peaking phase and you'd already backed off mileage a bit over the preceding couple of weeks, you might gain from those first 3-5 days, but your base--i.e., your strength--might begin slowly to evaporate from those next 5-7 days off.
I think the case for cross training is not as strong as its made out to be, frankly. When I had a stress fracture and was forced to take 8 weeks off, I trained pretty hard for most of that time, but still found all my base eroded. It took me a long while to build back. I started in the basement.
The real answer is: nobody knows how you'll do after 10 days off. Which makes the whole comeback project a voyage of discovery. A good case could be made that you'll lose SOMETHING, since crosstraining, while it will keep your CV humming, won't stop a certain atrophying of running-specific muscle strength. So if you were pushing hard for a PR, that may not come.
Then again, who knows? I took six days completely off due to an incipient stress fracture in the middle of last fall, then got pretty quickly back to work. Within a month I'd run a fast 10K (for me) and an equally strong half marathon. Sometimes unplanned breaks are your body's way of getting what it needs.
The first couple of runs, though, should be easy, easy, easy. Give the weight bearing muscles a chance to reorient. Then you'll be fine.