Just an observation. Have a good day everyone.
Just an observation. Have a good day everyone.
He’s a bit sus, but 10.03 is nothing at all to sneeze at.
That much of an improvement suddenly at age 26 is cause for pause.
Didn't look at all jacked to me
Kerley went from 10.49 in 2015 to 9.84 today.
Just an observation. Have a good day everyone.
11.05 in 2020 as well.
Did De Grasse just win gold?
EuroVisionary wrote:
11.05 in 2020 as well.
That was a contract meet.
And he was a 400m guy that had barely run 100m since 2016.
Lol. Kerley was running 43-mid around that time. Anyone who can do that is around 10-flat in the 100 at the least with proper training for that race.
EuroVisionary wrote:
Kerley went from 10.49 in 2015 to 9.84 today.
Just an observation. Have a good day everyone.
And a pretty dumb and pointless observation at that. I’ll point out to you and your simple mind that Fred Kerley also went from 400m to 100m from 2020-2021. Remember that?
He won bronze.
If you think Lamont the Italian is doped, you’ll need to prove it. (I think he’s probably doping, but w/out proof, there’s no there there.)
Kerley is obviously a remarkable talent.
I love DeGrasse, but how is it he can’t get his start right after all these years??
I wanted Su to medal, but some guys just never bring it on the biggest stage. Jacobs handled the moment, which is a triumph.
EuroVisionary wrote:
Kerley went from 10.49 in 2015 to 9.84 today.
Just an observation. Have a good day everyone.
Kerley never ran the 100 between 2015 and 2020, there's no progression to observe.
Serious question, is Jacobs considered white? Trying to figure out his skin color. I would say yes.
He is also totally doping.
rojo togo wrote:
He won bronze.
If you think Lamont the Italian is doped, you’ll need to prove it. (I think he’s probably doping, but w/out proof, there’s no there there.)
Kerley is obviously a remarkable talent.
I love DeGrasse, but how is it he can’t get his start right after all these years??
I wanted Su to medal, but some guys just never bring it on the biggest stage. Jacobs handled the moment, which is a triumph.
It’s not a criminal case and we aren’t determining whether to ban someone. Doping is so prevalent in sprinting at this point that from a common sense perspective, the burden is on the runner to show they’re clean or most reasonable people will just assume they’re cheating when a very odd progression is observed.
Do I need remind you that every sprinter under 9.78 wind legal EVER has either tested positive for a banned substance, dodged drug tests, or is Usain Bolt (who is above scrutiny either way)?
Except for Trayvon Bromell. He hasn’t been busted… but I have my suspicions on what’s going on there. I think he was running clean in Tokyo and look what happened.
yes he looks roided,but so did pretty much everyone else from the semi finals up.meanwhile the nigerians,qatari,kenyan and ivory coast sprinters looked steroided out of their brains!
Dutch Sprinter wrote:
Serious question, is Jacobs considered white? Trying to figure out his skin color. I would say yes.
He is also totally doping.
He’s biracial.
What a joke. To you I would therefore look roided out of my mind. Almost 55 and clean as a whistle.
He's biracial: his father is African American, a soldier stationed in Vicenza IICR, his mother is Italian, Born in the USA, moved to Italy when he was 18 months old.
His progression can be explained even without doing, until last year he was a essentially long jumper, as a matter of fact his trainer is a former trple jumper.
sprinter guy wrote:
rojo togo wrote:
He won bronze.
If you think Lamont the Italian is doped, you’ll need to prove it. (I think he’s probably doping, but w/out proof, there’s no there there.)
Kerley is obviously a remarkable talent.
I love DeGrasse, but how is it he can’t get his start right after all these years??
I wanted Su to medal, but some guys just never bring it on the biggest stage. Jacobs handled the moment, which is a triumph.
It’s not a criminal case and we aren’t determining whether to ban someone. Doping is so prevalent in sprinting at this point that from a common sense perspective, the burden is on the runner to show they’re clean or most reasonable people will just assume they’re cheating when a very odd progression is observed.
Do I need remind you that every sprinter under 9.78 wind legal EVER has either tested positive for a banned substance, dodged drug tests, or is Usain Bolt (who is above scrutiny either way)?
Your logic is gobbledygook. Yes, you do have to prove someone is doping via empirical evidence for such a charge to rise to the level of a ban and stripping of medals in the world of competitive sport. Without proof, all you have is internet speculation. This is too obvious to merit further explanation.
I think Jacobs is doping, but what I think doesn’t matter. A lot of people think all top sprinters, the whole NFL, every guy who hits a lot of homers, every athletic white person, etc are doping. So what? Opinions don’t decide Olympic finals.