Lead Foil Hat wrote:
Lead Foil Hat wrote:
Why less likely; GOF on bat corona viruses was occurring at that lab, and some funding in recent managed to spill over there from Fauci's wallet. Obviously the probability is lower than a lab leak, but still very possible. The odds that it came from that lab is much higher than the chance coincidence it originated naturally just kilometers from the lab's doors.
This is also not the "latest" whatever way you want to slander it. Fauci's financial fingerprints in this have been known since the beginning, and it is very likely the reason to push himself into the spotlight this past year.; he needed to control the narrative to protect himself.
There's no smoking-gun genomic evidence of engineering (not that there necessarily would be!). The furin site is not as definitive as some want it to be.
The WIV went to places and sampled coronaviruses. It seems most likely (to me) that a worker got infected on a sampling trip and spread it in Wuhan or they somehow picked up a cataloged strain in a lab accident.
These are both bad, but not quite as nefarious as GOF research. I don't see clear evidence the NIH (which I guess we are just calling "Fauci") funded GOF research at the WIV. They did fund sampling efforts, it seems, which isn't great from a safety perspective but more generally acceptable.
Trying to pin this whole thing on Fauci is a stretch and counter productive.