-
21
-
Steve The Addict OFFICIAL -----^^^^^ wrote:
In 1981 Jacques Attali wrote the book, Verbatim. It was written with world leaders/politicians corroborating their ideas for the future. It outlined how there would be a virus, either coming about by chance or created by design to help reduce and control the world population. This virus would kill off the old and weak, while stupid people would ask to be treated and many would eventually die from the so called treatment. It said the treatment would be deadlier than the disease and the stupid ones who asked for the treatment would "go to the slaughter house alone." Real book written by a great author, quotes are real, as are the world leaders and the scheme to dupe sheep. Go buy the book for yourself. Time to wake up.
Oh my goodness, you're right! I must go out and buy that book!
Do you think there will be time to buy it before I start to RUN FOR MY LIFE?
(I hope you are running for yours because, you know, COMMIES and stuff like that)
32 -
Steve The Addict OFFICIAL -----^^^^^ wrote:
In 1981 Jacques Attali wrote the book, Verbatim. It was written with world leaders/politicians corroborating their ideas for the future. It outlined how there would be a virus, either coming about by chance or created by design to help reduce and control the world population. This virus would kill off the old and weak, while stupid people would ask to be treated and many would eventually die from the so called treatment. It said the treatment would be deadlier than the disease and the stupid ones who asked for the treatment would "go to the slaughter house alone." Real book written by a great author, quotes are real, as are the world leaders and the scheme to dupe sheep. Go buy the book for yourself. Time to wake up.
Sure except why wouldn’t they prefer to keep the sheep around? Us sheep are easy going and will do what they say. We’ll pay our taxes and go to work while the free thinkers will freely think and revolt against the government presumably. Doesn’t make sense
10 -
Newname wrote:
EarlyRizer wrote:
falsifying business records?
Such as?
Why is it that we have to educate you? Maybe listen to a REAL news source or go find the indictment yourself.
I'll link it for you. How about you try READING IT. I know that reading is tough for you f*cking Trumpers, but give it a try.
Now, it IS a documents case, so it's not all that interesting, but let me break it down for you since you are completely clueless here.
1) Trump falsified business records. That in and of itself is a misdemeanor for each one. He did this a total of 34 times that the prosecution has decided to indict him on. These are CRIMES, whether you believe they should be or not, they ARE CRIMES.
2) These misdemeanors all became felonies because they were done in the furtherance of another crime...campaign finance law violation. Again, these ARE CRIMES. Doesn't matter if you think they shouldn't be, but they are.
3) Here is the language that is used for the counts to explain why they have become felonies, "...with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof...."
4) Each count comes with it the possibility of 4 years in prison. That's 136 years if the judge decided to have him serve them consecutively (if found guilty of them all). Now, that isn't going to happen. Even just a 4 year term isn't likely. Michael Cohen was sentenced to 3 years in prison for this nonsense that Trump ordered, so if Trump were a regular citizen, he would be and should be given MORE than 3 years in prison.
5) Will Trump spend time behind BARS for this NY case? No one knows for sure, and legal experts that I respect have said both yes and no, so clearly there is a difference of opinion here. At a minimum, his freedom will be removed, so some sort of house arrest at a minimum.
So, go read the indictment and stop asking stupid@ss questions.
21 -
What a maroon!
“I think Florida is in play nationally.”- Sleepy Joe at the no turnout Tampa rally.
#FJB
10 -
Flagpole wrote:
Newname wrote:
Such as?
Why is it that we have to educate you? Maybe listen to a REAL news source or go find the indictment yourself.
I'll link it for you. How about you try READING IT. I know that reading is tough for you f*cking Trumpers, but give it a try.
Now, it IS a documents case, so it's not all that interesting, but let me break it down for you since you are completely clueless here.
1) Trump falsified business records. That in and of itself is a misdemeanor for each one. He did this a total of 34 times that the prosecution has decided to indict him on. These are CRIMES, whether you believe they should be or not, they ARE CRIMES.
2) These misdemeanors all became felonies because they were done in the furtherance of another crime...campaign finance law violation. Again, these ARE CRIMES. Doesn't matter if you think they shouldn't be, but they are.
3) Here is the language that is used for the counts to explain why they have become felonies, "...with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof...."
4) Each count comes with it the possibility of 4 years in prison. That's 136 years if the judge decided to have him serve them consecutively (if found guilty of them all). Now, that isn't going to happen. Even just a 4 year term isn't likely. Michael Cohen was sentenced to 3 years in prison for this nonsense that Trump ordered, so if Trump were a regular citizen, he would be and should be given MORE than 3 years in prison.
5) Will Trump spend time behind BARS for this NY case? No one knows for sure, and legal experts that I respect have said both yes and no, so clearly there is a difference of opinion here. At a minimum, his freedom will be removed, so some sort of house arrest at a minimum.
So, go read the indictment and stop asking stupid@ss questions.
You're an idiot.
You should really listen to your corrupt moron prosecutors opening statement. This case you've invented or more likely the deranged case you're copying and pasting from some other idiot isn't the case that's actually happening.
You have no f*cking idea what you're talking about.
31 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
What a maroon!
“I think Florida is in play nationally.”- Sleepy Joe at the no turnout Tampa rally.
#FJB
1) Do I think Biden wins Florida? No. I think that state is too nuts to vote for Biden.
2) Is it out of the question? No.
3) Why is it not out of the question? Trump won Florida by 371,686 votes (5,668,731 for Trump and 5,297,045 for Biden). Since then, Trump has A) incited an insurrection; B) bragged about restricting abortion (and now Florida has one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the country); and C) he's on trial currently for 34 felonies. Regarding A, for a small amount of Trump voters, that was a bridge too far. Regarding B, the facts are that most Americans, as much as 70% of them, are in favor of pro-choice, and we have seen the election results prove that out in very red states like Kansas, Ohio, and Alabama. Regarding C, 15% of Trump voters have said they will not vote for Trump in November if he is a convicted felon. What I have said there is all fact, not hope, not liberal spin.
4) There is a high likelihood that Trump will be a convicted felon prior to the November election. No guarantees, but it is very likely. So, let's just deal with this convicted felon part, not even considering the insurrection and the abortion stuff. If 15% of Trump voters do not vote for him, even if they don't go vote for Biden, Trump loses. If the total voters remains the same, a loss of 15% of the votes for Trump gives him just 4,818,421 votes, and he loses to Biden if Biden keeps the same number of votes.
I know you'll argue that Biden won't get as many votes as last time because he's senile or some other such crap, but a good portion of this country hates Trump with a passion, and another portion is just tired of his constant drama. We will not be in recession on election day, so unless Biden is dead or incapacitated, anything could happen in his favor. Trump is facing too many headwinds.
So, does Biden actually THINK he can win in Florida? I think he believes there's a small chance as do I, but by showing up and saying syuch things, he will make the RNC spend money it doesn't have in that state, and that's the real benefit to Biden for going there and campaigning.
12 -
Trump calls Biden "sleepy Joe". Yet he can't stay awake in his own trial. How dare you treat an old man this way, what? you sure it isn't old man Joe Biden disguised as Trump in the court room saying it's cold and damp, flatulence galore.
How about the 200 million, who love him, he invited us to sit outside the court building.Maybe, just maybe Trump isn't as tough as he has led us to believe.
11 -
Liberals are idiots. wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Why is it that we have to educate you? Maybe listen to a REAL news source or go find the indictment yourself.
I'll link it for you. How about you try READING IT. I know that reading is tough for you f*cking Trumpers, but give it a try.
Now, it IS a documents case, so it's not all that interesting, but let me break it down for you since you are completely clueless here.
1) Trump falsified business records. That in and of itself is a misdemeanor for each one. He did this a total of 34 times that the prosecution has decided to indict him on. These are CRIMES, whether you believe they should be or not, they ARE CRIMES.
2) These misdemeanors all became felonies because they were done in the furtherance of another crime...campaign finance law violation. Again, these ARE CRIMES. Doesn't matter if you think they shouldn't be, but they are.
3) Here is the language that is used for the counts to explain why they have become felonies, "...with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof...."
4) Each count comes with it the possibility of 4 years in prison. That's 136 years if the judge decided to have him serve them consecutively (if found guilty of them all). Now, that isn't going to happen. Even just a 4 year term isn't likely. Michael Cohen was sentenced to 3 years in prison for this nonsense that Trump ordered, so if Trump were a regular citizen, he would be and should be given MORE than 3 years in prison.
5) Will Trump spend time behind BARS for this NY case? No one knows for sure, and legal experts that I respect have said both yes and no, so clearly there is a difference of opinion here. At a minimum, his freedom will be removed, so some sort of house arrest at a minimum.
So, go read the indictment and stop asking stupid@ss questions.
You're an idiot.
You should really listen to your corrupt moron prosecutors opening statement. This case you've invented or more likely the deranged case you're copying and pasting from some other idiot isn't the case that's actually happening.
You have no f*cking idea what you're talking about.
Um...huh? Whatch talkin' 'bout, Willis?
The link I provided is the indictment in this NY case against Trump. Everything I said there is true and/or relevant.
I know exactly what I'm talking about. How is it that you have this so wrong? Explain yourself...or not.
24 -
critic 100 wrote:
Trump calls Biden "sleepy Joe". Yet he can't stay awake in his own trial. How dare you treat an old man this way, what? you sure it isn't old man Joe Biden disguised as Trump in the court room saying it's cold and damp, flatulence galore.
How about the 200 million, who love him, he invited us to sit outside the court building.Maybe, just maybe Trump isn't as tough as he has led us to believe.
Wait, a guy who wears makeup and lifts in his shoes isn't tough? He's an old man. Old men are just old men...they aren't tough.
21 -
Flagpole wrote:
Liberals are idiots. wrote:
You're an idiot.
You should really listen to your corrupt moron prosecutors opening statement. This case you've invented or more likely the deranged case you're copying and pasting from some other idiot isn't the case that's actually happening.
You have no f*cking idea what you're talking about.
Um...huh? Whatch talkin' 'bout, Willis?
The link I provided is the indictment in this NY case against Trump. Everything I said there is true and/or relevant.
I know exactly what I'm talking about. How is it that you have this so wrong? Explain yourself...or not.
What is the "other crime" in the indictment you linked but apparently never even read?
The "other crime" is not mentioned in the indictment.
Your claim that campaign finance fraud is the other crime is not based on the indictment and has f*ck all to do with the opening statement your idiot prosecutor made.
22 -
Flagpole wrote:
critic 100 wrote:
Trump calls Biden "sleepy Joe". Yet he can't stay awake in his own trial. How dare you treat an old man this way, what? you sure it isn't old man Joe Biden disguised as Trump in the court room saying it's cold and damp, flatulence galore.
How about the 200 million, who love him, he invited us to sit outside the court building.Maybe, just maybe Trump isn't as tough as he has led us to believe.
Wait, a guy who wears makeup and lifts in his shoes isn't tough? He's an old man. Old men are just old men...they aren't tough.
Sleepy Joe shakes hands with invisible people.
#FJB
21 -
Liberals are idiots. wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Why is it that we have to educate you? Maybe listen to a REAL news source or go find the indictment yourself.
I'll link it for you. How about you try READING IT. I know that reading is tough for you f*cking Trumpers, but give it a try.
Now, it IS a documents case, so it's not all that interesting, but let me break it down for you since you are completely clueless here.
1) Trump falsified business records. That in and of itself is a misdemeanor for each one. He did this a total of 34 times that the prosecution has decided to indict him on. These are CRIMES, whether you believe they should be or not, they ARE CRIMES.
2) These misdemeanors all became felonies because they were done in the furtherance of another crime...campaign finance law violation. Again, these ARE CRIMES. Doesn't matter if you think they shouldn't be, but they are.
3) Here is the language that is used for the counts to explain why they have become felonies, "...with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof...."
4) Each count comes with it the possibility of 4 years in prison. That's 136 years if the judge decided to have him serve them consecutively (if found guilty of them all). Now, that isn't going to happen. Even just a 4 year term isn't likely. Michael Cohen was sentenced to 3 years in prison for this nonsense that Trump ordered, so if Trump were a regular citizen, he would be and should be given MORE than 3 years in prison.
5) Will Trump spend time behind BARS for this NY case? No one knows for sure, and legal experts that I respect have said both yes and no, so clearly there is a difference of opinion here. At a minimum, his freedom will be removed, so some sort of house arrest at a minimum.
So, go read the indictment and stop asking stupid@ss questions.
You're an idiot.
You should really listen to your corrupt moron prosecutors opening statement. This case you've invented or more likely the deranged case you're copying and pasting from some other idiot isn't the case that's actually happening.
You have no f*cking idea what you're talking about.
Correct!
31 -
DA Alvin Bragg's case against Donald Trump is 'historic mistake': New York Times guest essay
10 -
Never call Biden a moderate again. This would destroy the economy.
20 -
Liberals are idiots. wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Um...huh? Whatch talkin' 'bout, Willis?
The link I provided is the indictment in this NY case against Trump. Everything I said there is true and/or relevant.
I know exactly what I'm talking about. How is it that you have this so wrong? Explain yourself...or not.
What is the "other crime" in the indictment you linked but apparently never even read?
The "other crime" is not mentioned in the indictment.
Your claim that campaign finance fraud is the other crime is not based on the indictment and has f*ck all to do with the opening statement your idiot prosecutor made.
Lolz clearly your head hurts. You can't seem to understand why this is happening to your master, something just doesn't allow you to grasp it...
01 -
Lolz
"Gonzales kicked the hornet’s nest over the weekend when, during an interview on CNN, he went after Reps. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) and Bob Good (R-Va.) — “it’s my absolute honor to be in Congress, but I serve with some real scumbags” — launching personal attacks on the conservative duo.
“Matt Gaetz, he paid minors to have sex with them at drug parties. Bob Good endorsed my opponent, a known neo-Nazi,” Gonzales said on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday. “These people used to walk around with white hoods at night. Now they’re walking around with white hoods in the daytime.”
10 -
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
If you ask me paying hush money is not too different than a NDA (Non-disclosure agreement).
He was not indicted for paying hush money. Can you learn? I'm not so sure.
No it was the scumbag newly created statute (if they actually created a statute of wait for it, wait for it…influencing an election! HA!! holy smokes, most likely 2 Billion Americans have tried that over our History and finally, FINALLY charged someone. Ain’t that something to be proud of
10 -
Trollminator wrote:
Liberals are idiots. wrote:
What is the "other crime" in the indictment you linked but apparently never even read?
The "other crime" is not mentioned in the indictment.
Your claim that campaign finance fraud is the other crime is not based on the indictment and has f*ck all to do with the opening statement your idiot prosecutor made.
Lolz clearly your head hurts. You can't seem to understand why this is happening to your master, something just doesn't allow you to grasp it...
Black support up 500% for Trump because they identify with him being persecuted by Democrats. That would be you Troll.
10
