ah the old 'who benefits.' The dumbest logic ever.
clearly, the US invaded Poland in 1939 and bombed London so after the war the US would dominate the world economy.
Amirite, girls?
I think that's how it works. At the very least, the US definitely installed Hitler as Fuhrer. I mean, you'd have to think like a child to not at least acknowledge that!
Don't use words if you don't know what they mean it makes you look stupid.
I'm a libertarian so I think people should be able to do whatever they want so long as it no one gets hurt.
I'm not a Democrat like yourself who can't seem to enjoy their sexuality unless they tell a bunch of 6 year olds about it or a right wing religious nut who thinks sodomy is worse than murder.
No, man. As a Libertarian myself, I can tell you that there is nothing in your posting that suggests any Libertarian tendencies at all. None. You are what you are, and it's as I said. Fact.
So have you heard about this Taylor Greene stuff? It's breaking right now. If this ploytantrous sex stuff turns out to be true, we are looking at a Jimmy Swaggert type sitch. She's be up there crying, looking up at J. Christ, beseeching a forgiveness He will never give. I think you know damn well how ugly this is going to get for you guys.
I think it's silly to assume everyone fits in neat little boxes.
I don't follow Greene but she's in congress. What the hell does she have in common with Jimmy Swaggert?
Jesus forgives all sins. If you're going to spend your time hating religions you should at least have some clue what you're hating.
The backlogs are enormous - finding qualified judges to end the line fairly is not realistic, no.
This... There aren't enough immigration immigration lawyers in existence to process the number of cases needed, and if there were, expanding the courts is a many-years long process.
Not going to happen. In fact, from what I can tell, we're already trying to add judges, but it's not going to make a dent. So *given this*, shouldn't the laws be fixed? That's the question he's deflecting from.
Remember who killed the bipartisan immigration reform bill? House "Freedom" Caucus.
If the same bill brought up again, it will be filibustered by Republicans in the Senate.
No, man. As a Libertarian myself, I can tell you that there is nothing in your posting that suggests any Libertarian tendencies at all. None. You are what you are, and it's as I said. Fact.
So have you heard about this Taylor Greene stuff? It's breaking right now. If this ploytantrous sex stuff turns out to be true, we are looking at a Jimmy Swaggert type sitch. She's be up there crying, looking up at J. Christ, beseeching a forgiveness He will never give. I think you know damn well how ugly this is going to get for you guys.
I don't follow Greene but she's in congress. What the hell does she have in common with Jimmy Swaggert?
Jesus forgives all sins. If you're going to spend your time hating religions you should at least have some clue what you're hating.
You were just calling J. Christ's father (god) a "magic man in the sky" -- very scornful and derogatory of god -- and now you accuse me of hating religion?!?! (See Post No. 31581 on page 1580). Jesus Christ, are you EVER consistent on anything? You seem to just say whatever floats through you quasi-neolist head whether it contradicts your or not.
Taylor-Greene has plenty in common with Jimmy Swaggert, and if the polygamorious trantram sex turns out to be true, she's going to have a LOT more in common with him. "Help me, help help me, Jesus!" This won't be explained to you further, because you have no goddam idea what the hell you are talking about from one post to the next.
I don't follow Greene but she's in congress. What the hell does she have in common with Jimmy Swaggert?
Jesus forgives all sins. If you're going to spend your time hating religions you should at least have some clue what you're hating.
You were just calling J. Christ's father (god) a "magic man in the sky" -- very scornful and derogatory of god -- and now you accuse me of hating religion?!?! (See Post No. 31581 on page 1580). Jesus Christ, are you EVER consistent on anything? You seem to just say whatever floats through you quasi-neolist head whether it contradicts your or not.
Taylor-Greene has plenty in common with Jimmy Swaggert, and if the polygamorious trantram sex turns out to be true, she's going to have a LOT more in common with him. "Help me, help help me, Jesus!" This won't be explained to you further, because you have no goddam idea what the hell you are talking about from one post to the next.
The point was religion isn't necessary to figure out that killing babies is wrong.
It isn't.
I don't care what Taylor_Greene did over a decade ago in her private life before she was in office.
If you were actually a libertarian you wouldn't either.
You were just calling J. Christ's father (god) a "magic man in the sky" -- very scornful and derogatory of god -- and now you accuse me of hating religion?!?! (See Post No. 31581 on page 1580). Jesus Christ, are you EVER consistent on anything? You seem to just say whatever floats through you quasi-neolist head whether it contradicts your or not.
Taylor-Greene has plenty in common with Jimmy Swaggert, and if the polygamorious trantram sex turns out to be true, she's going to have a LOT more in common with him. "Help me, help help me, Jesus!" This won't be explained to you further, because you have no goddam idea what the hell you are talking about from one post to the next.
The point was religion isn't necessary to figure out that killing babies is wrong.
It isn't.
No. You are a hopelessly confused and inconsistent person. Here is the point:
1. You posted, in a scornful and derogatory way, that J. Christ's father (god) was a "magic man in the sky."
2. I later posted regarding Taylor-Greene that she would soon be "crying, looking up at J. Christ, beseeching a forgiveness He will never give."
3. You posted that my post (2, above) was me "spend[ing] [my] time hating religions." That would be a highly hypocritical statement (in addition to unsupported) in light of your post (1, above).
You should (1) strive to get some semblance of consistency in your political philosophies, (2) quite being a hypocrite, and (3) for Christ's goddam sake, quit bashing Christianity. There are some hardcore Christians here, and you are needlessly insulting them by calling their heavenly Father a "magic man in the sky." Am I clear on those three things that you need to work on? I do not want to see you back in this thread until those problem areas are cleared up.
You have no right to be this angry about Joe Biden. He didn't try to turn our country into a dictatorship or steal an election. He hasn't treated the DOJ like his personal revenge organization the way Trump did. He hasn't spit in the face of the rule of law. The proper action for you and your fellow moron Trumpers is to tuck your tails, admit that you backed a really criminal guy, regroup, and try to find an actual conservative who isn't a criminal to back next time.
Joe Biden is as caustic as water with lemon. He's not extreme. He's middle of the road. He's lukewarm water. You have serious anger issues to be this upset over Joe Biden. It also makes no sense. It's not Joe Biden's fault that you are so poor that you need gas to cost the same as it did during a huge global demand drop due to a pandemic.
Your sense of reality is off. Your ideas of the power of a President to affect the economy are wrong.
You need some time alone out in nature perhaps, away from the internet. Your anger is not justified.
sez the guy who thinks nazis are leftists and the USN blows up underwater gas pipelines.
The actual nazis were leftists whether you're bright enough to understand it or not...
Joe Biden said he would take out of the pipeline if Russia invaded Ukraine.
Victoria Nuland said the same thing.
Who benefits from the pipeline being sabotaged?
You are one crazy, ignorant moron.
No historian would ever equate Nazis with liberal ideology. You could not be more wrong about that. You clearly do not live on this planet. You might be the most insane person I have ever met anywhere.
“If you’re in a state where hurricanes often strike, like Florida or the Gulf Coast or into Texas, a vital part of preparing for hurricane season is to get vaccinated now,” Biden says in the video clip. “Everything is more complicated if you’re not vaccinated in a hurricane, or a natural disaster hits.”
As of September 2022, Donald Trump has been credibly accused of committing at least 55 criminal offenses since he launched his campaign for president in 2015. That total only reflects allegations relating to his time in or running for office and omits, for instance, Trump’s criminal exposure for fraudulent business dealings.
This is how screwed up you Dems have become ... you want to run on women-themed campaigns but you are so Woke that you can not even define what a woman is. Hilarious if not so pathetic.
As of September 2022, Donald Trump has been credibly accused of committing at least 55 criminal offenses since he launched his campaign for president in 2015. That total only reflects allegations relating to his time in or running for office and omits, for instance, Trump’s criminal exposure for fraudulent business dealings.
"Donald Trump has been credibly accused of committing at least 55 criminal offenses..." AND YET he has not been indicted for ANY of them. Hey AGip ... how are those Jan. 6 Committee hearings coming along? Oh ... they stopped? LOL!
As of September 2022, Donald Trump has been credibly accused of committing at least 55 criminal offenses since he launched his campaign for president in 2015. That total only reflects allegations relating to his time in or running for office and omits, for instance, Trump’s criminal exposure for fraudulent business dealings.
"Donald Trump has been credibly accused of committing at least 55 criminal offenses..." AND YET he has not been indicted for ANY of them. Hey AGip ... how are those Jan. 6 Committee hearings coming along? Oh ... they stopped? LOL!
