Seriously, it's a real problem. So, since the law says that we must let in all who say they're seeking asylum, we should all be in favor of funding extra judges and courts so these cases can be adjudicated timely and not have folks hanging around for years, right?
That's not even REMOTELY feasible with the numbers involved. Stop deflecting.
Please bear in mind that liberals think like children.
Several world leaders are working to prevent a potential invasion of Ukraine by Russia. Ed O'Keefe reports on the high-stakes talks and the new threat that c...
For more exclusive interviews, insight, and analysis like this, SUBSCRIBE to The Charlie Kirk Show TODAY: https://apple.co/2VCxGsh And for EVEN MORE—tune in to The Charlie Kirk Show LIVE on Salem Radi
No one benefits more from this sabotage than Ukraine.
Ukraine doesn't have the capability to carry it out.
The US does and Joe Biden and Victoria Nuland both happen to be knee deep in Ukraine when the US stepped in 2014 and overthrew the Ukrainian government.
New footage obtained by CNN shows Roger Stone calling for violence before the 2020 election. In the footage, Stone is also heard saying "f.ck voting" and "you see antifa, shoot to kill." The footage filmed by Danish producers could become crucial evidence for the Jan. 6 committee. Former Trump adviser Roger Stone was shown calling for violence on the day before the 2020 election as seen in documentary footage obtained by CNN. In clips previewed by the network, Stone and his associates are seated in a van returning home from a Doug Collins rally in Georgia on November 2, 2020, the day before the general election. In the car, Stone can be heard explaining his game plan to his colleagues. "F.ck the voting, let's get right to the violence," Stone is heard saying. "Shoot to kill, you see an antifa — shoot to kill."
Seriously, it's a real problem. So, since the law says that we must let in all who say they're seeking asylum, we should all be in favor of funding extra judges and courts so these cases can be adjudicated timely and not have folks hanging around for years, right?
That's not even REMOTELY feasible with the numbers involved. Stop deflecting.
In all seriousness, what deflection?
It's a problem and the law limits the responses available. If the cases of these people were heard within days and not years, they would know where they stood; most of them would leave the country (because a majority of asylum requests are not granted); many more of them would *appear* at their cases (because they'd be unlikely to go anywhere, if they knew they'd see a judge in a day or so; and because it would be easier to *keep* them from going anywhere); and the word would get out that most people who appeared at the border, after what might have been a long trek, would be ushered back out of the U.S. almost immediately.
Given that the law *requires* that these folks be given a trial/hearing, why not have enough judges and courts to take care of that immediately? Wouldn't any fan of law & order want that? You know, "justice delayed is justice denied" and all that?
Biden and Nuland said this specifically. Do you not believe the people you worship or do you really think just like a child?
Liar
Agip - you lied when you said conservatives were against immigrants. We are against ILLEGAL immigrants. How can you blatantly lie about that and lay with your loved one at night knowing you are a lying person?
Texas militia leader Lucas Denney has been sentenced to FIFTY TWO months in prison for assaulting a Metropolitan DC police officer during the January 6 Capitol attack.
