I never said that Aouita was a better 'middle distance runner' than Cram! Over the pure events from 800 to 1 mile, Cram clearly achieved more.
I only got involved in this thread because of the various inaccurate stats being bandied about which were clearly wrong. Those inaccuracies were not aimed at anyone in particular, although UKathleteicscoach seems to have a bee in his bonnet as I replied to his post.
RE Cram in 85, I followed his season then and have read accounts of it since, but he was in great form by Nice, having run an effortless 3:31 just 3 weeks earlier. Yes he was beaten by McKean in between, in a very slow kicker's race, where Cram underestimated McKean's speed in the last 100m, as he was then a somewhat unknown quantity. Remember, he was beaten again by McKean the next year at the Europpeans, when Cram was in similar great shape. Coe also lost to McKean in 88 and 89, in slow races, so it was no shame to be beaten by him in a 1:47 800m race.
Cram chose to err on the side of caution by pulling out of the AAA 800m final, after qualifying with a victory. The Nice race was only 3 days later, so it is unlikely that Cram was properly injured, but rather decided to save himself for the more important Nice race.
Yes, Cram suffered with injuries (mainly problems with his calf) throughout his career, but he said that they were more like 'niggles', which still allowed him to train. He just had to be careful not to run in too many races. This was true of 85, although he is on record as saying that he was able to have more intense training during that season than many others, hence (perhaps) his great form. I agree with you that he was better in Oslo (mile, at end of July) than in Nice, but I don't think it is totally accurate to suggest he was in anything other than very good form (and close to his very best) in Nice.
With regards to Elliott, of course his career over 800m is more impressive than Aouita's, but I think it's misleading to call him a 1:42 runner, when his pb was 1:42.97. Yes, technically he is a 1:42 man, but generally times were rounded to nearest tenth, so more like a 1:43.0 man. I personally think Aouita was capable of much faster than his 1:43.86 best, certainly capable of 1:43 low.
Of course Aouita is a controversial figure with some evidence that he may have doped, but putting that to one side, he showed some incredible form over 1500m in Nice and over 800m in Seoul.
Happy New Year to all posters on LetsRun.