Harambe wrote:
OK, now that you have just come out and said "viruses don't exist," my work here is done. Thanks for clearing that up, buddy.
...In which case, no longer feeding the troll would be a logical move.
Harambe wrote:
OK, now that you have just come out and said "viruses don't exist," my work here is done. Thanks for clearing that up, buddy.
...In which case, no longer feeding the troll would be a logical move.
*ahem* wrote:
Harambe wrote:
OK, now that you have just come out and said "viruses don't exist," my work here is done. Thanks for clearing that up, buddy.
...In which case, no longer feeding the troll would be a logical move.
Correct. I think at least a debate about "actual" vs "reported" cases/deaths would be more appropriate than debating the existence of viruses...what?
*ahem* wrote:
Harambe wrote:
OK, now that you have just come out and said "viruses don't exist," my work here is done. Thanks for clearing that up, buddy.
...In which case, no longer feeding the troll would be a logical move.
I just didn't think the eventual pivot would be: viruses don't exist. I am surprised.
It's like seeing a weird species of animal at the zoo, you just want to stare.
dunes runner wrote:
I am Sam wrote:
Converting the RNA to DNA does not make it 'human'.
Again, if that's a lie, then why are you saying it?
Stop trolling, it is becoming tiresome. No one has said that the RNA strand does not get converted to its complimentary DNA , that's exactly what the RT (Reverse Transcriptase) stands for if you'd bothered to understand.
Being DNA does not mean its human genetic material, just stop the nonsense, even you cannot be so stupid to believe it, so you must be trolling
dunes runner wrote:
I am Sam wrote:
BTW.
RNA, or DNA is not 'human genetic material'. It is a chemical that all animals have, plants have it too.
Perhaps we should test enough plants until we get false positives, then isolate them
What you learned about physiology from your business textbooks is quite humorous!
Hello? Another lack of comprehension? Where did I state in any of my posts that I do not have scientific training and biochemistry/chemistry/molecular biology education.
For Pete's sake, I deal with research instrumentation every working day.
Stop trolling, it does not make your nonsense true
I am Sam wrote:
Converting the RNA to DNA does not make it 'human'.
dunes runner wrote:
Again, if that's a lie, then why are you saying it?
I am Sam wrote:
Being DNA does not mean its human genetic material
RNA, or DNA is not 'human genetic material'.
Again, if you're not trolling, why do you keep bringing this up?
And why are you accusing other people of trolling, when you're the one who keeps doing it?