L L wrote:
So we have 4 Trump associates indicted on charges for improper relationships with Russians.
And we have 13 Russian nationalists indicted for election interference.
Hey I heard someone was coming? And also maybe that someone was done? Wasn't sure the details, hoping it can be cleared up for me.
Racket wrote:
L L wrote:
So we have 4 Trump associates indicted on charges for improper relationships with Russians.
And we have 13 Russian nationalists indicted for election interference.
Hey I heard someone was coming? And also maybe that someone was done? Wasn't sure the details, hoping it can be cleared up for me.
No collusion.
Trump is coming.
Flagpole is done.
Watching Rosenstein's statement. Paused when I heard him say that some of these Russians recruited and paid American citizens to carry out political activities. I assume that at some point those Americans would be subject to prosecution as co-conspirators.
Racket wrote:
L L wrote:
So we have 4 Trump associates indicted on charges for improper relationships with Russians.
And we have 13 Russian nationalists indicted for election interference.
Hey I heard someone was coming? And also maybe that someone was done? Wasn't sure the details, hoping it can be cleared up for me.
Mueller isn't coming.
The clown is Flagpole.
After the election, the alleged conspirators launched campaigns to ignite rallies in support of President-elect Trump AND PROTEST AGAINST THE ELECTION RESULTS ON THE SAME DAY; to include Charlotte protests and 'Trump is NOT my President' rally in New York City.
"There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charge conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."
Long Story Short:
These conspirators played the dumber part of both sides like a fiddle, but the Left (including Hardgroper, Fagpole, nontrumper) took the bait so damn hard. You're a bunch of idiots who spewed your venom and hate for a year. Too bad you a-holes tied up the FBI with this crap. Perhaps they could have been focused on important things like stopping MASSACRES.
if ur married wrote:
I_ Montoya wrote:
About "consensual": I do not think it means what you think it means.
It is perfectly possible for those who participate in adulterous sex to be doing so consensually.
It is obvious you do not know what adultery and wife mean.
"WIFE n. female partner in a marriage."
"ADULTERY n. voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than his or her lawful spouse."
"CONSENSUAL adj. relating to or involving consent."
"In modern English, consensual is often used when discussing sex, particularly whether the act was consensual, agreed on by both people participating, or non-consensual, if one person was unwilling or too young to legally give consent."
Do you have different dictionaries? If so, please post their definitions of these terms, and we can talk.
Noter of insults wrote:
Changerer of topics wrote:
Duly noted that you completely failed to address the topic and were forced to resort to personal insults on topics that you have no information on - without ever having been attacked to instigate such a bizarre response.
Unless of course you are a hooker. In that case I could imagine you feeling under attack though I assure you that was not my intent. You are not a hooker, are you?
///
And I take it that you are conceding on all counts.
You seem to have hurled the insults first. Then you just had to chime in again and defend yourself--an have now dug yourself into a deeper hole. . . . Let me guess, you are a Trump supporter who goes by the troll name of Hardloper. Now that is a real insult to a poster on these forums.
Kindly point out where I "hurled the insults first."
Or just stop lying.
Thanks.
///
Oh, and by the way, you are wildly wrong about your "trump supporter" nonsense. Indeed, nothing could be further from the truth. But I guess that shouldn't come as a surprise that someone who bases their posts on lies should be wildly detached from the truth. (though I must say I love your cute "let me guess" phrase. Did you make that up yourself? It sounds so original!)
Leftards wrote:
After the election, the alleged conspirators launched campaigns to ignite rallies in support of President-elect Trump AND PROTEST AGAINST THE ELECTION RESULTS ON THE SAME DAY; to include Charlotte protests and 'Trump is NOT my President' rally in New York City.
"There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charge conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election."
Long Story Short:
These conspirators played the dumber part of both sides like a fiddle, but the Left (including Hardgroper, Fagpole, nontrumper) took the bait so damn hard. You're a bunch of idiots who spewed your venom and hate for a year. Too bad you a-holes tied up the FBI with this crap. Perhaps they could have been focused on important things like stopping MASSACRES.
Sorry, didn't mean to include Hardloper as a "leftist." I misread one of his posts. He's one of the good guys. My apologies.
Changerer of topics wrote:
It sounds so original!)
In which world does adultery become consensual? The two are not related in any way.
You posted a very weak attempt to absolve Trump of cheating on his wife.
adultry wrote:
Changerer of topics wrote:
It sounds so original!)
In which world does adultery become consensual? The two are not related in any way.
You posted a very weak attempt to absolve Trump of cheating on his wife.
Do any of the Trump supports have a link where Trump wrote an EO erasing the commandment, "Thous shalt not commit adultery"?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said no American knowingly colluded with Russia in trying to influence the 2016 election. Rosenstein during a news conference said that there's no evidence efforts to impact that presidential vote were successful.
He basically just said there's now ZERO chance of charges that would lead to impeachment. And Flagpole's dream is over.
What a dishonest, dimwit, dolt you are.
He said that **the indictment** does not allege that the Russian operation changed the outcome of the presidential election or involved intentional collusion with Americans.
A) You know this is the end of the investigation, that no other indictments will come down? Of course not. I mean, it might be the end, or might only be the beginning. You'll have plenty of time to celebrate, when and if your hero Donald the A-hole Trump and his very closest associates and family members are not accused of any wrong-doing at the investigation's conclusion. Or you'll have plenty of time to moan about the "deep state" and "conspiracies" and "Evil FBI" when/if Donald and Co. are accused/charged with something. Slow you roll.
B) They are saying that these actions can not proven to have to have changed the outcome of the election. How can they say for sure what effect they had? They can't, so they are not alleging the outcome was changed due to such efforts. (but they might have)
Don't be a dishonest, dimwit (I know, it's like telling Trump to stop lying, good luck)
So, dear ol' Flagpole has lived up to his moniker, AGAIN! He guaranteed a Hillary win in 2016 & Russian collusion now. That is two gigantic flagpolian flops. Another swing and a miss.
M A G A!!!
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said no American knowingly colluded with Russia in trying to influence the 2016 election. Rosenstein during a news conference said that there's no evidence efforts to impact that presidential vote were successful.
He basically just said there's now ZERO chance of charges that would lead to impeachment. And Flagpole's dream is over.
What a dishonest, dimwit, dolt you are.
He said that **the indictment** does not allege that the Russian operation changed the outcome of the presidential election or involved intentional collusion with Americans.
A) You know this is the end of the investigation, that no other indictments will come down? Of course not. I mean, it might be the end, or might only be the beginning. You'll have plenty of time to celebrate, when and if your hero Donald the A-hole Trump and his very closest associates and family members are not accused of any wrong-doing at the investigation's conclusion. Or you'll have plenty of time to moan about the "deep state" and "conspiracies" and "Evil FBI" when/if Donald and Co. are accused/charged with something. Slow you roll.
B) They are saying that these actions can not proven to have to have changed the outcome of the election. How can they say for sure what effect they had? They can't, so they are not alleging the outcome was changed due to such efforts. (but they might have)
Don't be a dishonest, dimwit (I know, it's like telling Trump to stop lying, good luck)
You LOST dyno boy. No collusion, no impeachment. Deal with it.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Mueller isn't coming.
The clown is Flagpole.
I've been patiently waiting for this day.
Better yet, the best is still to come.
Flagpole is done.
DiscoGary wrote:
They are accused of spreading derogatory information about Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton,
So they are charging the Russians of literally "heckling" Hillary Clinton. Jumpin Jehoshaphat! I was right. The Russian Delusion scandal is now officially the Russian Heckling scandal. This investigation has become a comedy routine.
I say let the Mueller team keep going. Whatever it's costing us is worth it based on the entertainment value alone.
Gary, you're also a dishonest dimwit.
I'm glad you think that Russians coordinating with Putin breaking the law in an attempt to change the outcome of our election is hilarious. I'm glad it's a big joke to you. Yes, these are actual laws that were broken-
"Charged with violating laws that prohibit foreigners from spending money to influence federal elections in the United States.
The indictment charges that the foreigners falsely posed as American citizens, stole identities and otherwise engaged in fraud and deceit in an effort to influence the U.S. political process. ....also charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and five defendants with aggravated identity theft"
FYI: this is not part of the indictment, but they also hacked private e-mail accounts, hacked voter rolls, and attempted to hack actual voting machines. All in attempt to change election outcomes.
This is just a big joke to you?
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
So, dear ol' Flagpole has lived up to his moniker, AGAIN! He guaranteed a Hillary win in 2016 & Russian collusion now. That is two gigantic flagpolian flops. Another swing and a miss.
M A G A!!!
Actually, this bolsters Flagpole's claim that he was right all along because the godless Trump got illegal help.
I don't share this view, but it does help his argument.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said no American knowingly colluded with Russia in trying to influence the 2016 election. Rosenstein during a news conference said that there's no evidence efforts to impact that presidential vote were successful.
He basically just said there's now ZERO chance of charges that would lead to impeachment. And Flagpole's dream is over.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dow-rebounds-as-rosenstein-says-no-allegation-any-american-participated-in-unlawful-activity-with-russia-2018-02-16
The wording is key.
"The Dow Jones Industrial Average bounced back, coming off its intraday lows, after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Friday's indictment by the Justice Department of Russian individuals and other entities included no allegation that any American knowingly colluded with Russia in trying to influence the 2016 presidential election. Rosenstein, during a news conference, said that the indictment[/] lays out no evidence that efforts to impact the presidential vote were successful."
Looking forward to the next round of indictments.
In the Russian indictment: “communicated with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump campaign.”
LOL . . . unwitting individuals describes everyone working for Trump.
First there was the memo that "proved Trump's innocence."
Now thirteen Russians are being indicted, so there's no evidence of collusion?
Can someone catch me up on how this works? At this rate, Trump could be in a jail cell and people would be saying "see!!!! I told you he didn't do anything wrong."
Racket wrote:
First there was the memo that "proved Trump's innocence."
Now thirteen Russians are being indicted, so there's no evidence of collusion?
Can someone catch me up on how this works? At this rate, Trump could be in a jail cell and people would be saying "see!!!! I told you he didn't do anything wrong."
And when Trump gets his jail sentence extended Trumpers will scream, "SEE!!!!! I told you Trump would win a second term!"