We don't need a million thread on this topic. We like one thread per topic. We merged several others into this thread including one called "Alex Pretti was a deranged lunatic." and one called "New York Times reports that Pretti attacked ICE cars 11 days before his death" and one called "LeBron James: Why hasn't he commented on the Alex Pretti killing?"
Biden mentioned at least 590 times in Epstein files. Gates 6385 Bush 1588 (includes kate and gardening, lol) Soros 458 Clinton 3596 (includes the place). Mere numbers are essentially meaningless. Apart from Gates, obv.
The detentions and deportations during the Obama years were somewhat controversial, but not largely opposed. Here are the primary differences.
-these were not done performatively, the actions by ICE and CBP were more discreet so as not to cause disruption.
-the agents were not profiling individuals based on accent, color of their skin, or just looking like a foreigner; they were focused.
-the actions by agents were transparent
-the agents did not wear masks, geared up to their eyeballs and helmets in military gear
-the actions were not meant to intimidate an entire city
-they used court orders and due process
1) it is the insurgents making the publicity, not ICE. If ICE are being perfomrmative, why do the insurgents need to advertise their presence with whistles and horns. makes no sense.
2) ICE are equally focussed now.
3) they are equally transparent now.
4) it is the doxxing and harassment of ICE by insurgents that leads to their masks.
5) ICE is trying to be discrete, not intimidate, the brainwashing of a city is what the governers are doing.
He was unarmed and on his stomach being actively restrained by 7 guys when he was shot.
You think this is justified? It feels like you do since you won’t answer the question.
But yes, he was shot for no justifiable reason beyond incompetence and malice.
Incoming: another dodge.
I can not engage with an intellectually dishonest person. A person who’s stance is this was a random person on the street that was intentionally murdered is solely hellbent on manipulating other relevant facts. You are the king of omissions when it comes to trying to come up with a reasonable argument. A random bystander is the dumbest hill to die on.
And to cap it you’re spouting stupid remarks like the president is a pedophile. You’re just a deranged lunatic who feels that true empirical facts don’t matter. You’ve lost the narrative man, come back down to Earth and join the rest of us in reality, because if your talking points include the president raped children you aren’t living in the real world.
I never said they were a random person. I said:
1. They were unarmed
2. they were on their stomach
3. they were restrained by many agents
4. they were shot in the back
You cannot seem to answer basic factual questions. If you do decide to suddenly gain the courage to state your own beliefs, I’m happy to discuss things deeper.
But without understanding your views of the simple issues here, I’m forced to assume you’re deflecting because you know your answers will expose you to my elegant rhetorical jabs.
PS - Trump is mentioned like 1000 times in the Epstein files. Is it really “stupid” to think he may be a pedophile? Maybe ICE should go after him
The detentions and deportations during the Obama years were somewhat controversial, but not largely opposed. Here are the primary differences.
-these were not done performatively, the actions by ICE and CBP were more discreet so as not to cause disruption.
-the agents were not profiling individuals based on accent, color of their skin, or just looking like a foreigner; they were focused.
-the actions by agents were transparent
-the agents did not wear masks, geared up to their eyeballs and helmets in military gear
-the actions were not meant to intimidate an entire city
-they used court orders and due process
1) it is the insurgents making the publicity, not ICE. If ICE are being perfomrmative, why do the insurgents need to advertise their presence with whistles and horns. makes no sense.
2) ICE are equally focussed now.
3) they are equally transparent now.
4) it is the doxxing and harassment of ICE by insurgents that leads to their masks.
5) ICE is trying to be discrete, not intimidate, the brainwashing of a city is what the governers are doing.
6) ICE are using court orders and due process.
1) performative constitutional infringements should be protested, silly
2) ICE are going door to door to find guys already in prison. Not focused
3) ICE are masked, don’t get court orders, and triple down on shootings and illegal detentions, not transparent,
4) public officials should be held accountable by the public. Wear a badge number and no masks. Just like police who do this job just fine without crying about being held responsible
5) ICE is busting down doors without warrants not discrete
6) ice has done 2300 illegal detentions since July
1) it is the insurgents making the publicity, not ICE. If ICE are being perfomrmative, why do the insurgents need to advertise their presence with whistles and horns. makes no sense.
2) ICE are equally focussed now.
3) they are equally transparent now.
4) it is the doxxing and harassment of ICE by insurgents that leads to their masks.
5) ICE is trying to be discrete, not intimidate, the brainwashing of a city is what the governers are doing.
6) ICE are using court orders and due process.
1) performative constitutional infringements should be protested, silly
2) ICE are going door to door to find guys already in prison. Not focused
3) ICE are masked, don’t get court orders, and triple down on shootings and illegal detentions, not transparent,
4) public officials should be held accountable by the public. Wear a badge number and no masks. Just like police who do this job just fine without crying about being held responsible
5) ICE is busting down doors without warrants not discrete
6) ice has done 2300 illegal detentions since July
all wrong! Impressive!
You must have been really seething when Obama’s policies were detaining citizens.
I can not engage with an intellectually dishonest person. A person who’s stance is this was a random person on the street that was intentionally murdered is solely hellbent on manipulating other relevant facts. You are the king of omissions when it comes to trying to come up with a reasonable argument. A random bystander is the dumbest hill to die on.
And to cap it you’re spouting stupid remarks like the president is a pedophile. You’re just a deranged lunatic who feels that true empirical facts don’t matter. You’ve lost the narrative man, come back down to Earth and join the rest of us in reality, because if your talking points include the president raped children you aren’t living in the real world.
I never said they were a random person. I said:
1. They were unarmed
2. they were on their stomach
3. they were restrained by many agents
4. they were shot in the back
You cannot seem to answer basic factual questions. If you do decide to suddenly gain the courage to state your own beliefs, I’m happy to discuss things deeper.
But without understanding your views of the simple issues here, I’m forced to assume you’re deflecting because you know your answers will expose you to my elegant rhetorical jabs.
PS - Trump is mentioned like 1000 times in the Epstein files. Is it really “stupid” to think he may be a pedophile? Maybe ICE should go after him
So you’re doubling down on the incredibly stupid take that the president is a pedophile? And you’re also doubling down that there were no confounding circumstances that led to your “random person” finding himself in an exceedingly dangerous situation that was easily avoidable. Wow.
You really do live in a hyper liberal bubble if you consider yourself informed. Imagine a world where one walks around confidently thinking that stating over and over that the president is a pedophile is a rational comment. Not shocking I guess when someone insulates themselves so much within extremely progressive politics that they think making that statement is not a completely ridiculous assertion with no bearing at all to the real world. Deranged for sure.
Trumps polling has cratered. You’re on the wrong side of an 80/20 issue.
Keep posting until the election. I’m sure it’ll help. Try and keep your guy from raping teens before then as well
🤡🤡🤡
Sounds exactly like a libertarian.
Lol. He’s not a progressive leftwing nutter just like he’s not a narcissist either. Nobody posts and agitates more than Harambe, on any number of issues, and, certainly, nobody here likes to read his own “performative art” more than this guy. Now, watch him prove me correct because he just doesn’t have it in himself not to.
Remember, Walz’ paramilitary officers shooting paint bullets at people on their own private porches not impeding “curfew” with their cars or violating curfew by brandishing weapons and kicking out police taillights = good authoritarianism. “Libertarian” authoritarianism.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
1) it is the insurgents making the publicity, not ICE. If ICE are being perfomrmative, why do the insurgents need to advertise their presence with whistles and horns. makes no sense.
2) ICE are equally focussed now.
3) they are equally transparent now.
4) it is the doxxing and harassment of ICE by insurgents that leads to their masks.
5) ICE is trying to be discrete, not intimidate, the brainwashing of a city is what the governers are doing.
6) ICE are using court orders and due process.
1) performative constitutional infringements should be protested, silly
2) ICE are going door to door to find guys already in prison. Not focused
3) ICE are masked, don’t get court orders, and triple down on shootings and illegal detentions, not transparent,
4) public officials should be held accountable by the public. Wear a badge number and no masks. Just like police who do this job just fine without crying about being held responsible
5) ICE is busting down doors without warrants not discrete
6) ice has done 2300 illegal detentions since July
all wrong! Impressive!
1) you havent addressed the point. if ICE are perfomrative, why do the insurgents need to advertise them?
2) ICE are following known offenders. are you seriously saying they have a policy of going to an improsoned offenders addres to find him? how deranged are you?
3) i have explained the masks are your fault. Did you see judge Dugan? she got doe for disputing a court order. how can she do this if they dont get them?
4) already explained
5) examples please. and you dont always need a warrant to break down a door.
6) evidence please, and context to other similar numbers.
1) performative constitutional infringements should be protested, silly
2) ICE are going door to door to find guys already in prison. Not focused
3) ICE are masked, don’t get court orders, and triple down on shootings and illegal detentions, not transparent,
4) public officials should be held accountable by the public. Wear a badge number and no masks. Just like police who do this job just fine without crying about being held responsible
5) ICE is busting down doors without warrants not discrete
6) ice has done 2300 illegal detentions since July
all wrong! Impressive!
1) you havent addressed the point. if ICE are perfomrative, why do the insurgents need to advertise them?
2) ICE are following known offenders. are you seriously saying they have a policy of going to an improsoned offenders addres to find him? how deranged are you?
3) i have explained the masks are your fault. Did you see judge Dugan? she got doe for disputing a court order. how can she do this if they dont get them?
4) already explained
5) examples please. and you dont always need a warrant to break down a door.
6) evidence please, and context to other similar numbers.
no evidenciary argument put up. impressive.
Expect another non-answer. Or at least some link about tariffs.
1) you havent addressed the point. if ICE are perfomrative, why do the insurgents need to advertise them?
2) ICE are following known offenders. are you seriously saying they have a policy of going to an improsoned offenders addres to find him? how deranged are you?
3) i have explained the masks are your fault. Did you see judge Dugan? she got doe for disputing a court order. how can she do this if they dont get them?
4) already explained
5) examples please. and you dont always need a warrant to break down a door.
6) evidence please, and context to other similar numbers.
no evidenciary argument put up. impressive.
Expect another non-answer. Or at least some link about tariffs.
He’s struggling.
This lunatic has spent the last few pages saying the president is clearly guilty of raping kids. He is obviously not of sound mind currently. He has been having a rough few days.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.