exthrower wrote:
eric a blair wrote:honestly I don't know what your point is.
first of all, not all anti-trump people are "liberals." 14% of republicans now disapprove of trump. Up from 5% two weeks ago. Millions of independents and moderates are opposed to Trump.
When the Dems had control of the WH, Senate and House did you advise Republicans to stop caring about their issues? I didn't think so.
So really - what is your point? I'm curious.
Crying, pouting, whining deniers....All of this hysteria is coming from immature liberal babies who refuse to accept reality....Please...grow up....
You're the one whining that the system is rigged. I used to be in favor of helping the less fortunate, but Trumpkins have driven me in favor of government stepping back and letting us compete fair and square. I don't need a daddy figure to save me.
shiny blue wrote:
Realizations wrote:Oh, they realize it, all right! They are not THAT stupid. But the first part of your declaration is correct, they are indeed too childish and self-serving to admit it.
Just look at the Trumpettes on this thread - can you name a single one who does not come across as completely childish and self-serving? A single one who provides substance? Who can ever admit to a mistake? Who can ever admit that anything Trump does is ill-advised, wrong or beneath the dignity of the office?
Ah yes, because the Obama supporters of LRC always were able to admit when he F'd up / made a fool of himself / was spineless / etc. LOL
So, I take it you cannot. Admission accepted.
1100 wrote:
Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
Shout out to "1100" for squatting on the boards 24/7 in order to post this at the top of every page. Courageously soldiering on despite no one ever responding to you. Nice!
Dear Conservatives,
Here are two opinions:
1.) All life is sacred.
2.) Healthcare is not a right.
Pick one. You can't have both.
lol liberals think they know whats best thats why they totally forgot about middle america oh AND uh how are ur inner city cities doin? how long you ppl been controllin them ?? 100+ years in some cases??? lol failure does as failure does
Were not Reagan and Bush conservatives? Trickle down didnt work so well for the "inner cities" did it. People in the inner city are WAY better off now, then ever been. Just so happens that middle America is experiencing the effects of a global market and a highly developed society in economic respects. But since they're not "inner city" people, you are in an upswell of anger
lolololol wrote:
lol liberals think they know whats best thats why they totally forgot about middle america oh AND uh how are ur inner city cities doin? how long you ppl been controllin them ?? 100+ years in some cases??? lol failure does as failure does
Liberal posting like a moron to try to make conservatives look bad?
Pat and Jan wrote:
Were not Reagan and Bush conservatives? Trickle down didnt work so well for the "inner cities" did it. People in the inner city are WAY better off now, then ever been. Just so happens that middle America is experiencing the effects of a global market and a highly developed society in economic respects. But since they're not "inner city" people, you are in an upswell of anger
lolol liberals are cucks for globalism -learn life and trump is not "trickle down" does trump economics look like "trickle down" to u?? cuck lol
Just a Guess wrote:
Liberal posting like a moron to try to make conservatives look bad?
almost as bad as losing ~80 votes ~2000 counties like hillary c u nton lol
lolololol wrote:
Pat and Jan wrote:Were not Reagan and Bush conservatives? Trickle down didnt work so well for the "inner cities" did it. People in the inner city are WAY better off now, then ever been. Just so happens that middle America is experiencing the effects of a global market and a highly developed society in economic respects. But since they're not "inner city" people, you are in an upswell of anger
lolol liberals are for globalism -learn life and trump is not "trickle down" does trump economics look like "trickle down" to u?? cuck lol
yes they are trickle down. he wants to cut taxes massively on rich people and make poor people pay for for health care.
how is that not trickle down? It's the very definition of trickle down.
I think you are believing what he told you during the campaign, not looking at his actual proposals.
the AHCA is a huge tax cut to rich people and hike to poor and middle people.
looking like trump still doesn't have the votes. I'd guess the vote will be postponed. the conservatives just aren't getting what they want.
Go freedom caucus!
Never thought I'd say that.
I'm a total addict.
betting markets see passing this bill today as next to impossible.
I still think it has a solid chance...repubs tend to fall in line at the last second. they like hierarchy. In the end. And Ryan has every incentive to throw this POS to the Senate to make it their problem.
Republicans vote to allow Comcast to sell your browsing history and other private information to the highest bidder. Big Brother is fine as long as he's a Private Sector Jub Cree-ay-tur. Plus, now you can get 100 emails about dick pills after you finish up a browsing session at PornHub! Freedom!
I never can understand the attempt to defend trump by saying something about obama or his fans.
Not all critics of trump loved every policy or action of obama. It isn't like people have to be team obama or team trump and defend everything they do.
I get lots more of ads for single Asian or Russian women. I am not sure what to think about the ad asking something to the effect if I should masteurbzte before working out. I did not click it.
I wrote my congressperson to vote no for the healthcare bill. I am not 64 making 26500 but if I was there is no way I would be able to pay around 50 percent of my income in health insurance.
What is a guy in that situation going to do? Go to an emergency room and who is going to pay for his healthcare?
keep winning, trumpers
eric a blair wrote:
keep winning, trumpers
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/844977905335644160
is this the same silver that gave hillary c u nton a 99.99999999% chance of victory?? lolol
lolololol wrote:
eric a blair wrote:keep winning, trumpers
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/844977905335644160is this the same silver that gave hillary c u nton a 99.99999999% chance of victory?? lolol
Have you actually read the bill or a summary of it? Or are you basing your opinion on emotion?
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/22/15022462/republican-health-plan-ryan-trump-urban-institute-distribution-poor-rich?utm_campaign=vox.social&utm_medium=social&utm_content=voxdotcom&utm_source=facebooklolololol wrote:
is this the same silver that gave hillary c u nton a 99.99999999% chance of victory?? lolol
Must be a different one, since that Nate Silver gave Trump as favorable odds as found by any of the polling statisticians.