Trump disavowed David Duke and the left runs with saying he never did anyway. The left lies about just about everything.
The Charlottesville rally was organized by Richard Spencer who's a self described liberal who voted for Joe Biden. The only party which has openly anti-semitic members in DC is the Democrat party.
The most openly racist people in society are white liberals and the racist trash like Joy Reid and Ibram Kendi.
All liberals are bad at thinking that's why almost all of your ideas fail in the real world. None of them get thought through.
Trump said he would build a wall and Mexico would pay, reform healthcare and pass an infrastructure bill - his words are as useless as yours.
He kept more promises than any other politician in the last 40+ years despite Democrats obstructing every move he made.
Your open border policies aren't popular with anyone but lily white liberals and the cartels. And the country has noticed how unhinged the lily white liberals get when the brown people make it to their communities.
Move on from Trump for your own good. Those who have supported Trump in the past, so often don't do so well. Giuliani has just declared that he is broke. He is one one many completely ruined by loyalty to Trump.
Move from Trump, although it might be too late now for you. Trump is not good for you.
I'd love to. He's not going away though so he's going to the candidate in 2024.
Much like the overwhelming majority of the 74 million people who voted for him I have zero loyalty to Trump I just prefer him to people like yourself.
I don't like chicken salad but I'll choose it over chicken sh*t every time.
Most sane people would never contemplate eating chicken sh*t.
You're forcing yourself into a choice that you don't even need to make.
If you haven’t learned by now, A-Dolt in the room regurgitates the same BS over and over and over. He gets his jollies from attention and steering the thread off topic. He will never ever address Trumps vast criminality. It will always be whatboutisms and how someone else is worse.
if you haven’t tired of this repeated routine by now, keep engaging with him. He will do the same today, tomorrow and the next day. He adds nothing.
Trump said he would build a wall and Mexico would pay, reform healthcare and pass an infrastructure bill - his words are as useless as yours.
He kept more promises than any other politician in the last 40+ years despite Democrats obstructing every move he made.
Your open border policies aren't popular with anyone but lily white liberals and the cartels. And the country has noticed how unhinged the lily white liberals get when the brown people make it to their communities.
I get that you don't have a clue.
Name one promise Trump kept, other than a tax break for billionaires.
Speaking of open borders - Trump had fewer deportations than Biden and Obama, and it's not particularly close.
He kept more promises than any other politician in the last 40+ years despite Democrats obstructing every move he made.
Your open border policies aren't popular with anyone but lily white liberals and the cartels. And the country has noticed how unhinged the lily white liberals get when the brown people make it to their communities.
I get that you don't have a clue.
Name one promise Trump kept, other than a tax break for billionaires.
Speaking of open borders - Trump had fewer deportations than Biden and Obama, and it's not particularly close.
You were born yesterday if you believe the largest grass roots contributions of small donors to a Presidrntial campaign in History, some 80,000,000 people, are contributing because their priorities are tax breaks for billionaires. this isn’t even worth discussing. do you have anything better?
Trump said he would build a wall and Mexico would pay, reform healthcare and pass an infrastructure bill - his words are as useless as yours.
He kept more promises than any other politician in the last 40+ years despite Democrats obstructing every move he made.
Your open border policies aren't popular with anyone but lily white liberals and the cartels. And the country has noticed how unhinged the lily white liberals get when the brown people make it to their communities.
Thanks for proving my point - useless words strung together with absolutely no merit.
You are now this boards version of the homeless guy screaming at the lamp post because it wont move out of your way.
If republicans cared about democracy, law & order, moral decency, they would demand a different candidate. Backing Trump is an admission that these things do not matter to them.
Any level of critical thinking skill allows one to see that life is not 100% evil vs 100% good. Yet that is how the trump defenders frame it no matter the facts, indictments, and wake of ruin he leaves, they still consider him 100% good.
Surely there are conservatives who have beliefs and policies republicans agree with who is NOT embroiled in criminal defense on every front, actively tried to dismantle demcracy, and generally insults people constantly. If republicans chose a candidate like that, it might be an easy win. It would also mean republicans could defend their policies instead of constantly defending the actions on one person.
1. You have no idea what communism is but you use as a right winger curse word. It makes you look so stupid anytime you mention it.
2. Is him just taking advice from counsel to organize a coup the latest thing now? I guess you've finally moved on from the freedom of speech defense. They have proof that Trump knew he lost. He schemed and broke the law for more than 2 months, then incited an insurrection when he realized there were no other option. You're telling us he's going to use ignorance as a defense? LOLz
3. HRC lost to trump, admitted defeat and was a sore loser for all of 2 weeks. Trump gets beaten badly, loses more than 60 times in court, recounts don't go in his favor, he knowingly lies to the country, attempts a coup, incites an insurrection... and all you have is Russian collusion to compare to? Well that explains a lot.
I teach political philosophy.
This is a very suspect claim. You write like a graduate of the Baltimore public school system.
If republicans cared about democracy, law & order, moral decency, they would demand a different candidate.
In an American Democracy, nobody demands anything. We vote. That is the point. This is further proof that you align with Communism and your movement has brought that philosophy to our shores. Which is why you have the largest grass roots campaign of small donations in History (of all demographics) chipping in to stop you.
Trump said he would build a wall and Mexico would pay, reform healthcare and pass an infrastructure bill - his words are as useless as yours.
He kept more promises than any other politician in the last 40+ years despite Democrats obstructing every move he made.
Your open border policies aren't popular with anyone but lily white liberals and the cartels. And the country has noticed how unhinged the lily white liberals get when the brown people make it to their communities.
He works two years with a Rep House & Senate, and you speak of Dem “obstruction.”
His “victories”? Tax cuts that literally any Rep president would have gotten. Conservative judges that literally any Republican President would have gotten. Being part of fast-tracking a vaccine his base can’t stand.
Building <20 miles of wall per year and having Mexico pay for 0% of it is a glass half full at best in terms of a promise kept. The metaphorical “wall” of immigration policy and crackdown was the same (narrow-minded “tough” stance with draconian measures chips away at US moral stance not only nationally but internationally, policy toward students and professionals robs US economy of a % of potential key contributors).
I guess you can call his tariff/trade policy a promise kept, in the sense that he promised to do something likely to harm American farmers and workers, then he did just that.
And people like you act as though his assaults on norms are met with mere “pearl clutching” by people who just don’t like “mean tweets.” You ignore the incredibly long list of lifelong Republicans who call him a serious threat (not only to the political climate but to the rule of law). Those people don’t like Dem policies. People like Judge Luttig aren’t looking to get back in power or to cash in from the MI complex. But you act as though they all just want power, so your preferred option is the guy who’s always trying to play the angle and game the system for himself.
Look at how he taunts judges and prosecutors. You see the timeline and the actions (inactions) of the documents case, even against the advice of counsel. In all of the information before you, he clearly can’t refrain from pushing boundaries, lying, and refusing to adhere to the rules. Unable to trust your own lying eyes, you’re convinced that all of the texts and emails from his previously loyal staffers (e.g., about “conspiracy s**t beamed down from the mothership”) are easily dismissed, his 0-63 record in court is solely due to technicalities like standing, and that the absence of evidence is just a minor delay, and it’s coming, just like his health care plan, his infrastructure plan, and all those pesos from south of the border. He’s the guy whose greatest hit on the campaign trail was “lock her up” in one election; he literally called for investigation of an opponent 2 weeks before the next election. You don’t bat an eye at that (and probably cheered him on), but when he commits crimes to the extent that his own former AG calls the case strong and numerous Republican lifelong nat sec personnel call his actions a serious security threat, you’re appalled that anyone would bring charges (and the selective prosecution argument on that has been thoroughly rebutted).
An enormous but seldom discussed problem is one way he really messed over his supporters. They correctly diagnosed problems with both parties and said, “We hate you so much we’re riding with this guy.” Sure, they gained some clout that they still hold. But if he had acted halfway like a normal human being, they could have gotten 10x as much in returns on policies they like and the future of a party poised to serve their interests well. But he had to cultivate and maintain his symbiotic relationship with the Q sorts and spend the vast majority of his time feeding his ego and letting his impulses run amok. So now in the back of the heads of lots of party elites is one recurring thought: “See? These rubes can’t be trusted.”
These are only a representative sample, with some of the lowlights, about this guy. There’s so, so much more
It’s not inconceivable that you might have one or two good points in reply. It’s certain that his political opponents are flawed. Any arguments you’ve made or could make, however, are — at best — just an object lesson in missing the forest for the trees.
I will say this, though: If he does in fact provide “irrefutable evidence” of voter fraud seemingly on a scale to have a meaningful impact on state vote counts, I will change my tune to whatever extent the evidence dictates. Can I expect that you’ll see him as a fraud if his promised evidence is far from “irrefutable”?
He kept more promises than any other politician in the last 40+ years despite Democrats obstructing every move he made.
Your open border policies aren't popular with anyone but lily white liberals and the cartels. And the country has noticed how unhinged the lily white liberals get when the brown people make it to their communities.
I get that you don't have a clue.
Name one promise Trump kept, other than a tax break for billionaires.
Speaking of open borders - Trump had fewer deportations than Biden and Obama, and it's not particularly close.
He took the US out of the farcical Paris Climate Accords, he was tough on China, he put conservatives on SCOTUS.
The tax cuts were for everyone despite what you've been told to believe.
The border was secure enough that not many people tried to sneak in under Trump. It's absurd to claim that Obama and Biden are tough on the border because the deport a miniscule fraction of the hordes they let in.
If republicans cared about democracy, law & order, moral decency, they would demand a different candidate. Backing Trump is an admission that these things do not matter to them.
Any level of critical thinking skill allows one to see that life is not 100% evil vs 100% good. Yet that is how the trump defenders frame it no matter the facts, indictments, and wake of ruin he leaves, they still consider him 100% good.
Surely there are conservatives who have beliefs and policies republicans agree with who is NOT embroiled in criminal defense on every front, actively tried to dismantle demcracy, and generally insults people constantly. If republicans chose a candidate like that, it might be an easy win. It would also mean republicans could defend their policies instead of constantly defending the actions on one person.
Trump only got 44% of the vote in the Republican primary in 2016. The idea that the entire GoP wanted him is absurd.
Meanwhile, Democrats voted for Bernie Sanders and Clinton bought the nomination.
And gtfoh with any talk about morality or caring about law and order as a Democrat.
Who on earth has ever said Trump is 100% good? He was the lesser of two evils.
Democrats can't defend their policies. They're all terrible. Try it.
He kept more promises than any other politician in the last 40+ years despite Democrats obstructing every move he made.
Your open border policies aren't popular with anyone but lily white liberals and the cartels. And the country has noticed how unhinged the lily white liberals get when the brown people make it to their communities.
He works two years with a Rep House & Senate, and you speak of Dem “obstruction.”
His “victories”? Tax cuts that literally any Rep president would have gotten. Conservative judges that literally any Republican President would have gotten. Being part of fast-tracking a vaccine his base can’t stand.
Building <20 miles of wall per year and having Mexico pay for 0% of it is a glass half full at best in terms of a promise kept. The metaphorical “wall” of immigration policy and crackdown was the same (narrow-minded “tough” stance with draconian measures chips away at US moral stance not only nationally but internationally, policy toward students and professionals robs US economy of a % of potential key contributors).
I guess you can call his tariff/trade policy a promise kept, in the sense that he promised to do something likely to harm American farmers and workers, then he did just that.
And people like you act as though his assaults on norms are met with mere “pearl clutching” by people who just don’t like “mean tweets.” You ignore the incredibly long list of lifelong Republicans who call him a serious threat (not only to the political climate but to the rule of law). Those people don’t like Dem policies. People like Judge Luttig aren’t looking to get back in power or to cash in from the MI complex. But you act as though they all just want power, so your preferred option is the guy who’s always trying to play the angle and game the system for himself.
Look at how he taunts judges and prosecutors. You see the timeline and the actions (inactions) of the documents case, even against the advice of counsel. In all of the information before you, he clearly can’t refrain from pushing boundaries, lying, and refusing to adhere to the rules. Unable to trust your own lying eyes, you’re convinced that all of the texts and emails from his previously loyal staffers (e.g., about “conspiracy s**t beamed down from the mothership”) are easily dismissed, his 0-63 record in court is solely due to technicalities like standing, and that the absence of evidence is just a minor delay, and it’s coming, just like his health care plan, his infrastructure plan, and all those pesos from south of the border. He’s the guy whose greatest hit on the campaign trail was “lock her up” in one election; he literally called for investigation of an opponent 2 weeks before the next election. You don’t bat an eye at that (and probably cheered him on), but when he commits crimes to the extent that his own former AG calls the case strong and numerous Republican lifelong nat sec personnel call his actions a serious security threat, you’re appalled that anyone would bring charges (and the selective prosecution argument on that has been thoroughly rebutted).
An enormous but seldom discussed problem is one way he really messed over his supporters. They correctly diagnosed problems with both parties and said, “We hate you so much we’re riding with this guy.” Sure, they gained some clout that they still hold. But if he had acted halfway like a normal human being, they could have gotten 10x as much in returns on policies they like and the future of a party poised to serve their interests well. But he had to cultivate and maintain his symbiotic relationship with the Q sorts and spend the vast majority of his time feeding his ego and letting his impulses run amok. So now in the back of the heads of lots of party elites is one recurring thought: “See? These rubes can’t be trusted.”
These are only a representative sample, with some of the lowlights, about this guy. There’s so, so much more
It’s not inconceivable that you might have one or two good points in reply. It’s certain that his political opponents are flawed. Any arguments you’ve made or could make, however, are — at best — just an object lesson in missing the forest for the trees.
I will say this, though: If he does in fact provide “irrefutable evidence” of voter fraud seemingly on a scale to have a meaningful impact on state vote counts, I will change my tune to whatever extent the evidence dictates. Can I expect that you’ll see him as a fraud if his promised evidence is far from “irrefutable”?
You miss the forest for the trees. The alternatives to Trump were Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.
If you have 2 sh*t choices the intelligent person picks the option that will do less harm. Democrats destroy everything they touch.
All these people supporting Trump fell in line just like everyone predicted. They were DeSantis fanboys until they weren't. They said they wouldn't. That Trump was done. But then they did.
If they were principled they would demand a candidate without 91 felony accounts. (I can't believe that I am even typing that)
Fox News has created the rabid Right wing base 15 years ago and it owns the party and the party takes marching order from the crazies. There is no place for any normal Republicans anymore. Look what happened when Fox tried to say Trump lost. They lost their viewers and went back to crazy to keep them.
He kept more promises than any other politician in the last 40+ years despite Democrats obstructing every move he made.
Your open border policies aren't popular with anyone but lily white liberals and the cartels. And the country has noticed how unhinged the lily white liberals get when the brown people make it to their communities.
He works two years with a Rep House & Senate, and you speak of Dem “obstruction.”
His “victories”? Tax cuts that literally any Rep president would have gotten. Conservative judges that literally any Republican President would have gotten. Being part of fast-tracking a vaccine his base can’t stand.
Building <20 miles of wall per year and having Mexico pay for 0% of it is a glass half full at best in terms of a promise kept. The metaphorical “wall” of immigration policy and crackdown was the same (narrow-minded “tough” stance with draconian measures chips away at US moral stance not only nationally but internationally, policy toward students and professionals robs US economy of a % of potential key contributors).
I guess you can call his tariff/trade policy a promise kept, in the sense that he promised to do something likely to harm American farmers and workers, then he did just that.
And people like you act as though his assaults on norms are met with mere “pearl clutching” by people who just don’t like “mean tweets.” You ignore the incredibly long list of lifelong Republicans who call him a serious threat (not only to the political climate but to the rule of law). Those people don’t like Dem policies. People like Judge Luttig aren’t looking to get back in power or to cash in from the MI complex. But you act as though they all just want power, so your preferred option is the guy who’s always trying to play the angle and game the system for himself.
Look at how he taunts judges and prosecutors. You see the timeline and the actions (inactions) of the documents case, even against the advice of counsel. In all of the information before you, he clearly can’t refrain from pushing boundaries, lying, and refusing to adhere to the rules. Unable to trust your own lying eyes, you’re convinced that all of the texts and emails from his previously loyal staffers (e.g., about “conspiracy s**t beamed down from the mothership”) are easily dismissed, his 0-63 record in court is solely due to technicalities like standing, and that the absence of evidence is just a minor delay, and it’s coming, just like his health care plan, his infrastructure plan, and all those pesos from south of the border. He’s the guy whose greatest hit on the campaign trail was “lock her up” in one election; he literally called for investigation of an opponent 2 weeks before the next election. You don’t bat an eye at that (and probably cheered him on), but when he commits crimes to the extent that his own former AG calls the case strong and numerous Republican lifelong nat sec personnel call his actions a serious security threat, you’re appalled that anyone would bring charges (and the selective prosecution argument on that has been thoroughly rebutted).
An enormous but seldom discussed problem is one way he really messed over his supporters. They correctly diagnosed problems with both parties and said, “We hate you so much we’re riding with this guy.” Sure, they gained some clout that they still hold. But if he had acted halfway like a normal human being, they could have gotten 10x as much in returns on policies they like and the future of a party poised to serve their interests well. But he had to cultivate and maintain his symbiotic relationship with the Q sorts and spend the vast majority of his time feeding his ego and letting his impulses run amok. So now in the back of the heads of lots of party elites is one recurring thought: “See? These rubes can’t be trusted.”
These are only a representative sample, with some of the lowlights, about this guy. There’s so, so much more
It’s not inconceivable that you might have one or two good points in reply. It’s certain that his political opponents are flawed. Any arguments you’ve made or could make, however, are — at best — just an object lesson in missing the forest for the trees.
I will say this, though: If he does in fact provide “irrefutable evidence” of voter fraud seemingly on a scale to have a meaningful impact on state vote counts, I will change my tune to whatever extent the evidence dictates. Can I expect that you’ll see him as a fraud if his promised evidence is far from “irrefutable”?
And you can't prove voter fraud in a mail in election when the voter rolls have MILLIONS of ineligible voters on them and blue counties count votes unsupervised. Once the envelope is disposed of you have know of telling if a vote is legitimate or not.
Democrats are immoral and corrupt not stupid. They know how to cheat they've been practicing cheating at elections for decades.
Anyone who thinks they would pass up cheating in the easiest election to cheat in in human history is a fool.
Name one promise Trump kept, other than a tax break for billionaires.
Speaking of open borders - Trump had fewer deportations than Biden and Obama, and it's not particularly close.
You were born yesterday if you believe the largest grass roots contributions of small donors to a Presidrntial campaign in History, some 80,000,000 people, are contributing because their priorities are tax breaks for billionaires. this isn’t even worth discussing. do you have anything better?