Franklin as well.
-
20
-
Great oak in
10 -
SouthOC949 wrote:
Great oak in
I am confused. Was great oak 3rd or 4th in the CA merge?
00 -
They were third. Oakdale fourth.
20 -
Oakdale snubbed, best team to not make nxn
72 -
Boys - we got Franklin, Riverton and Great Oak.
Who is 4th? Is the list posted anywhere ?
10 -
craigslittleangel wrote:
Oakdale snubbed, best team to not make nxn
wow 77:28 doesn't make it? That 4th team better place top 10
31 -
the fourth team has to be either niwot or vandegrift
10 -
rankingsareout wrote:
the fourth team has to be either niwot or vandegrift
Plainfield South missed it by 1 point / beat Plainfield North several times this season. But outside of DGN, that’s a weak region
10 -
Murb wrote:
rankingsareout wrote:
the fourth team has to be either niwot or vandegrift
Plainfield South missed it by 1 point / beat Plainfield North several times this season. But outside of DGN, that’s a weak region
I don't think the nxn committee is dumb enough to choose plainfield south or ridgefield
10 -
They picked DGN last year and DGN came home with 10th! Everybody underestimates Illinois!
00 -
10
-
was just published on runnerspace listing all the At-Large teams
Niwot boys got the fourth spot; girls At-Large slots were pretty much as predicted (2 SW + Buchanan and York). They also have the individuals listed.
70 -
Niwot is IN!!!!
40 -
Last year, there were 8 California teams at NXN.
This year, there will be 8 Southwest teams at NXN
50 -
Murb wrote:
Last year, there were 8 California teams at NXN.
This year, there will be 8 Southwest teams at NXN
oakdale deserves better. Niwot should have been snubbed for their nxr southwest results
96 -
Oakdale was only a few points off to beat great oak in the merge. If Great Oak was 4th at merge, they would have taken Great Oak over Niwot.
42 -
rankingsareout wrote:
Murb wrote:
Last year, there were 8 California teams at NXN.
This year, there will be 8 Southwest teams at NXN
oakdale deserves better. Niwot should have been snubbed for their nxr southwest results
Oakdale had a great top 4, but their 5th runner has been inconsistent, and they didn’t really have a great 6th / 7th to back him up. The committee probably saw that as a red flag.
That’s the kind of team structure that Rocky Mountain ID had last year which could also explain why they weren’t chosen last year.I guess they chose a deeper team (Niwot) over Oakdale
30 -
A teams deepness is the most overrated quality I think there is. Was the nxn committee choosing teams based on who would win if all the 5s had a bad day or got hurt? They’re the top 5 on that team for a reason, and should be ranked and chosen as such. The truth is the 5 for Oakdale wasn’t as fast as some of the other cali teams, but that top 5 still got 3rd at Clovis, still had a faster team time than great oak (qualifiers), and still had a near identical power merge score as great oak. Great oak surely deserved to go, but so did the 14th best cali team ever.
22 -
people outside of california have no idea how good oakdale really is. They were 20 points behind Dana Hills. Now watch what Dana Hills will do at NXN.
32
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.