Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

There WAS surveillance and Trump was right. Meanwhile Jake "Fake News" Tapper scrambles to spin and parse words:

"Nunes was clear to say this was not wiretapping of Trump at Trump Tower as POTUS charged." - yeah right, Jake. Spying is spying, deal with it.

EXCERPT:

REPORTER: “Do you believe the President appropriately used the word 'wiretapping?' Was it used correctly in his tweets, based on the information that you have seen?”

NUNES: “I think the wiretapping, if you use it generally like the President has said, he clearly used it differently than what I think a lot of people took it which was did Obama actually wiretap the Trump Tower, which we know didn’t happen. I think the President has been pretty clear on that.”

REPORTER: “But the physical act of the wiretapping, do you see anything —“

NUNES: “No, and I said that on day two.”

REPORTER: “Can you rule out the possibility that senior Obama Administration officials were involved in this?”

NUNES: “No, I cannot.”

https://grabien.com/story.php?id=95469

trump was not right. There was no phone tap on trump tower. EVERYONE denies that.

trump and other officials seem to have been caught up in incidental surveillance - meaning they were talking on the phone to people who had warrants out on them.

who were they talking to? And why were they talking to people the IC and FISA judge thought needed surveilling?

that's the question now.

as for nunes - he is supposed to be overseeing the WH, not helping them along. This is a massive breakdown in the system.

here is the key paragraph:

Nunes described the surveillance as most likely being “incidental collection.” This can occur when a person inside the United States communicates with a foreign target of U.S. surveillance. In such cases, the identities of U.S. citizens are supposed to be kept secret — but can be “unmasked” by intelligence officials under certain circumstances.

Agip Detector wrote:

Agip Detector wrote:

Then, 13 minutes later, FLAGPOLE- the originator of the term "Flagpoled" (you know, EPICLY failing at something- not a lot of people actually know the story of where that term came from, since most people don't follow running or messageboards of the sort...but I digress) posted this:

"----------------------------------------------------------------------------

agip wrote:

the election is over - NH and NV are done deals. 90% for NV and 81% for NH

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The election was over a long time ago."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This one from Agip was when the fist little crack began to appear at 7:53pm on Election Night:

"uh oh

michigan is starting to break red

betting odds for MI are now 65/35 for HRC"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Then, at 9:23pm, the Left starts turning on themselves out of frustration, as T ReXXX humiliates Flagpole, after Flagpole had gone silent for about 2 hours:

"down to 44% on 538.

NOT looking good. NOT at all.

Flagpole's idiocy being fully on display is almost worth this. But....no, nothing is.

Guaranteed prediction: in 4 years from now, all the Trump fans/defenders will have abandoned him and say "I didn't vote for Trump, I voted 3rd party! I never liked the guy, I was a Cruz guy" or some such nonsense. The same thing happened with Bush. You all had his back, all got him elected, and then.....pretended you never did. You support an unqualified idiot or joker, and then when he is a disaster, you wipe your hands of him and pretend you had nothing to do with it."

Deplorable."

eric a blair wrote:

as for nunes - he is supposed to be overseeing the WH, not helping them along. This is a massive breakdown in the system.

Then at 10:36pm, finger-pointing and conspiracy theories start to fly (this was from an anonymous butthurtster, not Agip or Flagpole):

"Magical.

Florida: Trump has a 110,000 vote lead with 93% reporting. 7% missing was in almost entirely 66% Democratic. Trump ends up +140,000.

Only way is: Hacking the vote. Same goes in NC, WI, MI and IA. Way to convenient to have every battle ground state had nearly every poll be off, and suddenly 1,000,000 Trump voters showed up.

You heard it here first."

Nunes himself said that Trump was wrong.

Outside of the White House on Wednesday, Nunes confirmed his opinion that Trump was not wiretapped in the sense the president meant with his March 4 tweet.

But he did suggest Trump could have been caught up in incidental collection — or legal surveillance of the communications of foreign nationals who may be in contact with U.S. citizens. He signaled that the intelligence community may have, in his mind, included certain names in their reports that did not belong there.

A little while later, Agip just starts making things up:

"so we'll have recounts in PA n=and NH

not sure what that means

if HRC wins Mich, trump might not have 270...so this could grind away for weeks in the courts"

FInally, at 11:47pm, Flagpole- after the biggest FLAGPOLE in the history of Flagpoles, mind you- gets enough balls to make a statement. In doing so, he once again shows that his mind is incapable of wrapping his head around the idea of probability... and then also, as expected from him, tries to assert some quality of superiority by implying that he looks good without his shirt. The guy's a laughing stock:

"Looks like Trump is going to win. So I guess he had 100% chance of winning and I had that wrong. I am shocked and of course disappointed and have a feeling of doom for our nation, but that can be part of another thread. In this thread, it's all about Trump's big night. Congrats to the victor (not official yet, but would be small miracle at this point for Hillary to win).

I will have to flex with my shirt off in front of a mirror to make myself feel better."

So enough of that brief stroll down memory lane.

And I guess the lesson learned here is:

If you Flagpole (EPICLY fail) so massively after months and months of parroting the idiotic mainstream media's biased, intentionally-misleading BS, which is literally and shamelessly "undermining democracy" right out in the open.....

.....you don't take some tie to reflect inward, and look into why you may have made yourself look like such a fool.....

.....you just change your LRC Name and continue doing the same thing.

"But, but, but RUSSIA!!!!!"

DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:

eric a blair wrote:

of COURSE you picked the outlier.

you hack

RCP average has trump at 43.6%, and unfavorability at 50.4, the highest yet.

keep dreaming that Trump has widespread support.

Agip, keep dreaming if you believe Americans give 2 fcks about you basement dwelling POS😂

You have been DECIMATED❗😂😂😂

President Trump made America Great Again his first week in office👍

🇺🇸

Stop it. We don't repeat the same words over and over. We have lives after the election. You try to make us look stupid. Stop the dumb parody.

Are you going to admit you are DFF?

Agip Detector wrote:

Agip Detector wrote:

Agip posted this on Nov 8th, at 3:26pm:

"just warning youse

I have a long long list of predictions from this thread and the media world that I will dish out tomorrow.

Talk to you later - I'm heading out for a run"

Did you ever dish those out, Agip?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

But then he posted this, at 7:27pm on election night:

"the election is over - NH and NV are done deals. 90% for NV and 81% for NH"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

DFF is John rivella!

the truth shall set u free wrote:

Are you going to admit you are DFF?

Agip Detector wrote:

But then he posted this, at 7:27pm on election night:

"the election is over - NH and NV are done deals. 90% for NV and 81% for NH"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I'm not DFF dude. Clearly different writing styles. Unlike Agip and Eric.

sovereign citizen wrote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/blogs/plum-line/wp/2017/03/21/trumps-lies-are-failing-him-and-it-is-making-him-deeply-frustrated/

Schiff: "I want to refer you to exactly what the President said and ask you whether there is any truth to it. First the President claimed;

'Terrible. Just found out that Obama had my wires tapped in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism'

Director Comey, was the President's statement that Obama had his wires tapped in Trump Tower a true statement?"

Comey: "With respect to the President's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets. And we have looked carefully inside the FBI. The Department of Justice has asked me to share with you that the answer is the same for the Department of Justice and all its components. The Department (of Justice) has no information that supports those tweets."

So to recap, the IC "incidentally" spied on Trump and "incidentally" disseminated it around DC and "incidentally" said he lied when he caught them. The MSM is just trying to cover up as Trump threw a wrench in their Russia narrative.

Trump wins again!

Considering "surveillance" is what what the IC does, how did they "investigate Trump ties to Russia," without surveilling him?

Answer: "Incidentally" on purpose.

eric a blair wrote:

here is the key paragraph:

Nunes described the surveillance as most likely being “incidental collection.” This can occur when a person inside the United States communicates with a foreign target of U.S. surveillance. In such cases, the identities of U.S. citizens are supposed to be kept secret — but can be “unmasked” by intelligence officials under certain circumstances.

agip, please go back to your original handle. You're not fooling anybody.