Clearly you had nothing to do on Christmas Day, which says a lot about you.
It's about respect. What are you going to do next, disparage African American historical figures during Black History Month?
Facts are facts. The fact is you came here on Christmas Day to disparage a devout Christian runner who is an Olympic, World, and National champion just because he's "only" the second-fastest to ever run the 3000m indoors (by less than a quarter of a second) and because he lost an early June 1500m race by less than a tenth of a second to a fellow global champion. Awful.
The violins are working overtime. Get a life.
You're just mad because I pointed out what an awful thing you did and how stupid your argument was.
You're just mad because I pointed out what an awful thing you did and how stupid your argument was.
It wasn't my argument - it's your interpretation of it - and it is hardly "awful" to point out that the runner in question hasn't won anything of international significance outside one race a year. Well, maybe it is "awful" if you don't want to draw attention to that fact. It's sent you into a meltdown.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
You're just mad because I pointed out what an awful thing you did and how stupid your argument was.
It wasn't my argument - it's yours - and it is hardly "awful" to point out that the runner in question hasn't won anything of international significance outside one race a year. Well, maybe it is "awful" if you don't want to draw attention to that fact. It's sent you into a meltdown.
It's exactly your argument. Now you finally realize how stupid it is, and you're trying to deny ownership of it. Too late. The stupidity is all yours. So is the awfulness of what you did on Christmas Day.
It wasn't my argument - it's yours - and it is hardly "awful" to point out that the runner in question hasn't won anything of international significance outside one race a year. Well, maybe it is "awful" if you don't want to draw attention to that fact. It's sent you into a meltdown.
It's exactly your argument. Now you finally realize how stupid it is, and you're trying to deny ownership of it. Too late. The stupidity is all yours. So is the awfulness of what you did on Christmas Day.
Next you're going to compare what I said to the crucifixion.
It's exactly your argument. Now you finally realize how stupid it is, and you're trying to deny ownership of it. Too late. The stupidity is all yours. So is the awfulness of what you did on Christmas Day.
Next you're going to compare what I said to the crucifixion.
No. You're not capable of inflicting bodily harm on someone like that. The only thing you're capable of doing is writing stupid and awful things on the internet. As you've demonstrated in this thread.
Next you're going to compare what I said to the crucifixion.
No. You're not capable of inflicting bodily harm on someone like that. The only thing you're capable of doing is writing stupid and awful things on the internet. As you've demonstrated in this thread.
So you're comparing my posts to inflicting bodily harm? You really need to take a break from this place. You're about to have breakdown.
No. You're not capable of inflicting bodily harm on someone like that. The only thing you're capable of doing is writing stupid and awful things on the internet. As you've demonstrated in this thread.
So you're comparing my posts to inflicting bodily harm? You really need to take a break from this place. You're about to have breakdown.
Wow, now you're demonstrating your laughably poor reading comprehension!
No. You're not capable of inflicting bodily harm on someone like that. The only thing you're capable of doing is writing stupid and awful things on the internet. As you've demonstrated in this thread.
So you're comparing my posts to inflicting bodily harm? You really need to take a break from this place. You're about to have breakdown.
That's not what he was saying. You are really bad with words. No wonder you had to work as a photographer.
Hardly upset. I'm not the one desperately defending Hocker.
You are the one desperately attacking him.
Yeah, Livs is obviously upset. That’s why he keeps bumping this thread even though he’s already been soundly defeated. It’s bothering him so much he can’t stop thinking about it!
Rough few days for Livs. He got absolutely eviscerated in both this thread and the one about the US in the 1950s. It’s been fun to see, but I don’t know how he comes back. Any normal person would feel too embarrassed to come back here after that. It’s like he’s a glutton for self-embarrassment.
Yeah, Livs is obviously upset. That’s why he keeps bumping this thread even though he’s already been soundly defeated. It’s bothering him so much he can’t stop thinking about it!
Rough few days for Livs. He got absolutely eviscerated in both this thread and the one about the US in the 1950s. It’s been fun to see, but I don’t know how he comes back. Any normal person would feel too embarrassed to come back here after that. It’s like he’s a glutton for self-embarrassment.
When you go on and on about a commenter instead of the thread topic you show what has you by the balls.
Yeah, Livs is obviously upset. That’s why he keeps bumping this thread even though he’s already been soundly defeated. It’s bothering him so much he can’t stop thinking about it!
Rough few days for Livs. He got absolutely eviscerated in both this thread and the one about the US in the 1950s. It’s been fun to see, but I don’t know how he comes back. Any normal person would feel too embarrassed to come back here after that. It’s like he’s a glutton for self-embarrassment.
When you go on and on about a commenter instead of the thread topic you show what has you by the balls.
When you post about Hocker and Jakob over 7000 times in a year you show what has you by the balls.