Of course you will.
We've only come this far because you obstinantly refuse to accept the plain meanings of the words "presume" and "deem", and you do not understand what it takes to "establish" a fact. Instead you fabricate tortuous doublespeak explanations where not establishing non-intent to a subjective balance of probability standard to a panel of lawyers can only mean intent is an established fact outside the artificial limited scope of WADA-based proceedings.
Regarding my priorities, you are partly right. I expressed before that the gold standard of justice in first world countries avoids convicting innocent athletes at the expense of letting unprovably guilty athletes off.
You say colorful things like "spread of doping in the sport", and "fraction of the numbers" without knowing whether prevalence is increasing, decreasing, or stable, nor what fractions you speak of. The solution to combatting the alleged spread of doping is not lowering the quality of the busts to increase the quantity by catching more dolphins with more tuna, but working on prevention, i.e. educating athletes, coaches, doctors, pharmacists, etc., and working on investigating those providing the drugs. It is an abject failure to persecute innocent athletes, so the process designed to protect innocent athletes should get that part right everytime.
But my priorities aren't connected to false positives over false negatives per se, but rather proven factors of performance, and what can be concluded from established facts and supporting evidence, that is not contradicted by other tangible evidence. My interest in doping is that it is often alleged as a contributing factor of elite performance, while almost completely lacking established facts and supporting evidence, often supported by bad conclusions from science and a number of logical fallacies.
There should be no doubt that the current process will catch and convict many innocent athletes, because it is baked into the design of a "guilty until proven innocent" approach, and the safeguards have been removed. Applying your tortuous standard of establishing facts, your sake of argument concession has been established as fact at least 27 times in the USA alone, since 2015. If we extrapolate that to the world population, that is a lot of innocent athletes being trapped by WADA's new 2015 net. You love Kenyan busts. The increased busts in Kenya are in part a result of lowering the quality of busts, and increasing testing to include more lower caliber athletes.
As far as hills to die on, the totality of the evidence against Houlihan allows us to conclude she ingested a low (WADA's word) amount of nandrolone one night in December 2020 from an unidentified source. Anything more, from both experts and fans, is pure conjecture. Houlihan is not the first example where assumptions and conspiracy far outweighs proven reality. Paula never had a case to answer. After 7 years of heightened scrutiny, no NOP athlete under Salazar was ever charged for doping. Notwithstanding his high profile bust, Jama Aden was cleared by the Spanish courts, and never charged by the IAAF/WA for any rule violation. Not long ago, 43% (or 1 in 2 by your math) of letsrun poll respondents believe El G's records were clean. Even going as far back as Mary Decker Slaney, it is not clear that her T/E ratio indicates high T, or low E. Many Kenyan athetletes are busted for nandrolone, in a country that doesn't routinely castrate its pigs. Athletes like Colvert, Karus, Sommer and Lagat, were questionably convicted by EPO positives from an error prone process that is made purposely difficult for an athlete to defend.
The sport is damaged by implementing and executing poor quality anti-doping, and such widespread, yet baseless, conspiracies among the fans of the sport.