How does Joe Rogan come back from this?

If Whoopi goes down, so should Joe.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

We Purge Anywhere wrote:

He (AdultRoom) has what is called "contextual aphasia" in DSM circles. It manifest itself when the rubber meets the road, as it has here. But he is no less a child of the universe than any other aphasiatic with spare socks to burn. AdultRoom can mount his stand here and anywhere else his wavering eyes lead him to, whether at cross-purposes with his aims or not. He is enlightening his own reckoning. Maybe if people had been kinder to him, they could have appreciated his duggery and zeal in defending what he believe is his own honor here.

You actually make Stephen A look intelligent by comparison.

You're actually pulling off huckstering for stupidity and racism at the same time. Nice!

Look man, this isn't about race. It's about your inability to connect the dots in any more than a dearth of superfluous. You've failed on multiple occasions to "put the egg back in the nog," as it were, and now you're back here yet again crying about it?!? What gives? You've had ample time to gather your clear and abject dissonance into some semblance of an order. I mean, people will cut you a short cat leash for a while, but not after this display. You're like some polemeister buffoon in search of a molehill dispute. Again, what gives, man?

Lollys Master wrote:

Just slap a $5M fine and let him be. The only place where psychopath republican bros feel pain is their wallet.

For what exactly - exercising his freedom of free speech? Do I like this and/or think it's a good look? No. But I must have missed the memo where the 1st amendment was arbitrarily applied to people based on their race, gender, jobs, points of view etc

Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:

Lollys Master wrote:

Just slap a $5M fine and let him be. The only place where psychopath republican bros feel pain is their wallet.

For what exactly - exercising his freedom of free speech? Do I like this and/or think it's a good look? No. But I must have missed the memo where the 1st amendment was arbitrarily applied to people based on their race, gender, jobs, points of view etc

First Amendment does not prohibit private companies from restricting speech, only Congress.

We Purge Anywhere wrote:

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

You actually make Stephen A look intelligent by comparison.

You're actually pulling off huckstering for stupidity and racism at the same time. Nice!

Look man, this isn't about race. It's about your inability to connect the dots in any more than a dearth of superfluous. You've failed on multiple occasions to "put the egg back in the nog," as it were, and now you're back here yet again crying about it?!? What gives? You've had ample time to gather your clear and abject dissonance into some semblance of an order. I mean, people will cut you a short cat leash for a while, but not after this display. You're like some polemeister buffoon in search of a molehill dispute. Again, what gives, man?

You're embarrassing yourself Stephen A.

xaxis19 wrote:

Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:

For what exactly - exercising his freedom of free speech? Do I like this and/or think it's a good look? No. But I must have missed the memo where the 1st amendment was arbitrarily applied to people based on their race, gender, jobs, points of view etc

First Amendment does not prohibit private companies from restricting speech, only Congress.

The Section 230 protections social media hides behind to do the bidding of the Democrats needs to be removed.

Liberals used to defend the 1st amendment. Now they attack it.

The Democrats have gone off the reservation.

We Purge Anywhere wrote:

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote: (yack)

Look man, this isn't about race. It's about your inability to connect the dots in any more than a dearth of superfluous. You've failed on multiple occasions to "put the egg back in the nog," as it were, and now you're back here yet again crying about it?!? What gives? You've had ample time to gather your clear and abject dissonance into some semblance of an order. I mean, people will cut you a short cat leash for a while, but not after this display. You're like some polemeister buffoon in search of a molehill dispute. Again, what gives, man?

hey purge...

nice shots.

everything crash wrote:

We Purge Anywhere wrote:

Look man, this isn't about race. It's about your inability to connect the dots in any more than a dearth of superfluous. You've failed on multiple occasions to "put the egg back in the nog," as it were, and now you're back here yet again crying about it?!? What gives? You've had ample time to gather your clear and abject dissonance into some semblance of an order. I mean, people will cut you a short cat leash for a while, but not after this display. You're like some polemeister buffoon in search of a molehill dispute. Again, what gives, man?

hey purge...

nice shots.

Blessings to you, Crash. It is only through Faith that we can climb the hills of manifest glory.

Maybe it's the only way some people (AdulRom) can learn the hard ways. Collectively, we've been very patient with his obstinance and perfunctorious nature. We've even indulged is child-like glee far beyond the call of duty to which we were ostensibly summoned. At some point, if he didn't learn the lessons of yesteryear, he himself becomes a radicalized truant barely fit to drink from the same cup that overflows with bounty in OUR America. He's on the outside looking in, with a stunned, vacuous look on the fleshy jowls of his racial past.

xaxis19 wrote:

Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:

For what exactly - exercising his freedom of free speech? Do I like this and/or think it's a good look? No. But I must have missed the memo where the 1st amendment was arbitrarily applied to people based on their race, gender, jobs, points of view etc

First Amendment does not prohibit private companies from restricting speech, only Congress.

I have no idea what your response here is even meant to mean?

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

Liberals used to defend the 1st amendment. Now they attack it.

Yes exactly - it's all about the amendments and freedoms of speech........ except when there is something to be gained by not being all about it.

I will reiterate, I find Rogain painful and don't agree with the things he said here - but he's entitled and allowed to say them.

Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

Liberals used to defend the 1st amendment. Now they attack it.

Yes exactly - it's all about the amendments and freedoms of speech........ except when there is something to be gained by not being all about it.

I will reiterate, I find Rogain painful and don't agree with the things he said here - but he's entitled and allowed to say them.

Why painful?

He asks questions and he let's people talk. The "news" sets an agenda and then crafts 30 second segments into reinforcing their political views.

Rogan is being attacked because he's not bought and paid for like the rest of the media.

Any "liberal" should be horrified by the establishment coming after free speech.

Any "liberal" who sides with the establishment to attack the 1st amendment is a fool.

Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:

xaxis19 wrote:

First Amendment does not prohibit private companies from restricting speech, only Congress.

I have no idea what your response here is even meant to mean?

I think he’s saying Spotify should censor Rogan when it comes to things that may offend people. You’d have to censor over 90% of comedians.

To the OP, what exactly is Rogan coming back from? He’s still doing podcasts, and still the number 1 podcast in the world. If Spotify eventually caves to the cancel mob, Rogan could go back to doing it on his own. So far, they have not lost any major artists, and cancelling Rogan could lead to many more people leaving Spotify than a few over the hill rockers.

Who would fine Rogan? The FCC has no jurisdiction over podcasts. I’m not sure if there is anything in his Spotify contract regarding fines, but I’m sure they made it pretty friendly to Joe as he values his creative freedom.

Lollys Master wrote:

Yeah so I suppose it's ok now for sick republican bros to throw around the "N" word. What's next, "Kikes", "Beaners", "Fag**ts", maybe "Hitler did nothing wrong" and "women belong in the kitchen"?

Dude f***** up majorly and has to pay. Once again, republicans don't feel with a heart, they feel with a wallet, therefore that's the only way to teach them.

If UFC can fine Khabib with $500k, then Spotify should either fine Rogan or take him off the catalog.

You're upset and you have literally no idea what Rogan actually said.

You are the textbook moron the left relies on. You are a "useful idiot".

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

Salvitore Stitchmo wrote:

Yes exactly - it's all about the amendments and freedoms of speech........ except when there is something to be gained by not being all about it.

I will reiterate, I find Rogain painful and don't agree with the things he said here - but he's entitled and allowed to say them.

Why painful?

He asks questions and he let's people talk. The "news" sets an agenda and then crafts 30 second segments into reinforcing their political views.

Rogan is being attacked because he's not bought and paid for like the rest of the media.

Any "liberal" should be horrified by the establishment coming after free speech.

Any "liberal" who sides with the establishment to attack the 1st amendment is a fool.

Liberals no know one is attacking the 1st amendment. It is only conservatives who dont know the constitution who think the first admentment is involved.

Lollys Master wrote:

Yeah so I suppose it's ok now for sick republican bros to throw around the "N" word. What's next, "Kikes", "Beaners", "Fag**ts", maybe "Hitler did nothing wrong" and "women belong in the kitchen"?

Dude f***** up majorly and has to pay. Once again, republicans don't feel with a heart, they feel with a wallet, therefore that's the only way to teach them.

If UFC can fine Khabib with $500k, then Spotify should either fine Rogan or take him off the catalog.

You’d fit right in in North Korea, PRC, USSR, etc

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

Lollys Master wrote:

Yeah so I suppose it's ok now for sick republican bros to throw around the "N" word. What's next, "Kikes", "Beaners", "Fag**ts", maybe "Hitler did nothing wrong" and "women belong in the kitchen"?

Dude f***** up majorly and has to pay. Once again, republicans don't feel with a heart, they feel with a wallet, therefore that's the only way to teach them.

If UFC can fine Khabib with $500k, then Spotify should either fine Rogan or take him off the catalog.

You're upset and you have literally no idea what Rogan actually said.

You are the textbook moron the left relies on. You are a "useful idiot".

I know exactly what and when he said it. Wasn't ok then and isn't ok now. I bet if he pays a hefty fine, he won't do it again.

Also pray that I don't get your IP address. It's time people learned accountability for what they say, buddy.

bothered wrote:

Lollys Master wrote:

Yeah so I suppose it's ok now for sick republican bros to throw around the "N" word. What's next, "Kikes", "Beaners", "Fag**ts", maybe "Hitler did nothing wrong" and "women belong in the kitchen"?

Dude f***** up majorly and has to pay. Once again, republicans don't feel with a heart, they feel with a wallet, therefore that's the only way to teach them.

If UFC can fine Khabib with $500k, then Spotify should either fine Rogan or take him off the catalog.

You’d fit right in in North Korea, PRC, USSR, etc

Go into any ghetto in the US and say the "N" word to someones face. It will be super american of you to pick your teeth up from the sidewalk.

There is always a price to pay. If you park in front of a hydrant and also of you insult people in your podcast.

Lollys Master wrote:

Yeah so I suppose it's ok now for sick republican bros to throw around the "N" word. What's next, "Kikes", "Beaners", "Fag**ts", maybe "Hitler did nothing wrong" and "women belong in the kitchen"?

Dude f***** up majorly and has to pay. Once again, republicans don't feel with a heart, they feel with a wallet, therefore that's the only way to teach them.

If UFC can fine Khabib with $500k, then Spotify should either fine Rogan or take him off the catalog.

Republicans….lol

How stupid are you?