worst analogy ever wrote:
We already have something that is readily available in great abundance, you can put it in your mouth, and it satisfies the craving for food. It's called food.
...dumbass
worst analogy ever wrote:
We already have something that is readily available in great abundance, you can put it in your mouth, and it satisfies the craving for food. It's called food.
...dumbass
Pornosopher wrote:
worst analogy ever wrote:We already have something that is readily available in great abundance, you can put it in your mouth, and it satisfies the craving for food. It's called food.
...and it costs money, we need to produce it and you need to work for it.
And the food pill would be given away for free. Obviously.
I think that it is best if you just cut your losses and quietly retreat.
Pornosopher wrote:
puritans abound! wrote:So you worry that if you started watching more porn you wouldn't want to have sex with a actual women anymore and the species would die out? Or that maybe you'd never leave your room? What exactly is the danger?
Maybe you should ask your mom to set a computer-time limit for you.
I'm thinking about it on a more macro level. I don't have a specific "danger" that I am referring to, which I thoght I made clear.
With regard to the food... I am not talking about food in pill form. I am talking about a pill that negated the need for food. You'd never be hungry again. It might not be an issue for one person, but loose it on the general population and I would imagine that it would change things. Would people be as inclined to work if they didn't have to feed their families? Maybe it would be good, who knows. My point is that it would change things as we know it.
I am not anti porn. I guess I am more anti the overabundance and casual usage of porn. I have no issue with a guy jerking off to a porn mag or a porn video, but when it becomes the norm, it could negatively affect society. The key word is "could."
Personally, since you have asked, I like my sex life and I kind of pity buddies of mine who jerk off to porn all the time. I look at it this way: There is nothing better than a beer and a burger after a long run. The beer and the burger wouldn't be quite so good if I didn't run and ate it 3 meals a day. So maybe, just maybe, that applies to sex as well. Maybe not.
You know, we've never allowed interracial marriage before. Maybe something bad will happen if we do. I don't know what it would be....but it could happen...and it could be bad.
Did I laugh at some of the responses to my first post (which many of you failed to truly read)! You all are so cranky and bitter, I doubt any of you is getting laid.
worst analogy ever wrote:
And the food pill would be given away for free. Obviously.
I think that it is best if you just cut your losses and quietly retreat.
Yes, free. Like porn.
You really are a dumba$$.
people in the 50s wrote:
You know, we've never allowed interracial marriage before. Maybe something bad will happen if we do. I don't know what it would be....but it could happen...and it could be bad.
I am not sure what this has to do with anything, but more power to you.
A female view wrote:
Did I laugh at some of the responses to my first post (which many of you failed to truly read)! You all are so cranky and bitter, I doubt any of you is getting laid.
Right? What a pathetic bunch of losers. Don't insult their porn or they will go crazy on you. Yet, male runners still wonder why the rest of the world views them as weenies. Haha.
Look at this... wrote:
worst analogy ever wrote:And the food pill would be given away for free. Obviously.
I think that it is best if you just cut your losses and quietly retreat.
Yes, free. Like porn.
You really are a dumba$$.
OK, so please state a specific and plausible unintended consequence of internet porn for us. No one has done this yet.
LRC Female wrote:
A female view wrote:Did I laugh at some of the responses to my first post (which many of you failed to truly read)! You all are so cranky and bitter, I doubt any of you is getting laid.
Right? What a pathetic bunch of losers. Don't insult their porn or they will go crazy on you. Yet, male runners still wonder why the rest of the world views them as weenies. Haha.
One of the most passionate defenders of porn is the writer Dan Savage. He is not a runner and he gets laid a lot (or at least I presume since he is a pretty famous gay male in an open marriage). So it really has nothing to do with not being able to get laid or being resentful because one can't get women.
puritans abound! wrote:
What exactly do you fear is going to happen...a bunch of guys are going to wank themselves to death?
The divorce rate goes up and the birth rate goes down in countries where women become able earn a living one their own, without a man.
I'd be willing to bet that the divorce rate goes up and the birth rate goes down as porn becomes increasingly available.
Propagating the species is pretty fundamental...
A female view wrote:
I keep hearing "I want a freak in bed," "Act like a porn star," etc. It's great if the Mr. & Mrs. want to swing from the rafters (and if both are into that every time, great). But the Mrs. shouldn't be expected to be Linda Lovelace 4-5 times a week, especially if that's not what SHE wants. Gentlemen, it's O.K. to satisfy her needs and fantasies once in awhile. Sex can be a form of communication between two people. If it is all about fantasy and porn, then it really doesn't matter who's in bed with you, does it? The Mrs. doesn't always like to feel that way. Compromise, and don't go to bed with these porn star expectations EVERY time. She'll feel like a failure or disappointment, and will be a lot less interested in having sex with you.
I once told my husband I never wanted to feel as if I ignored the housework, didn't make dinner and put the kids to bed filthy, he would still be happy so long as I put out like a prostitute 4-5 times a week. In other words, when you complement or thank her, be sincere about it - don't use it as a means just to get laid.
By the way, in couples counseling, we were warned off porn, for many of the reasons I allude to. Creates unreasonable expectations, depersonalizes sex and your partner, and skews your view of what sex should be. Get addicted, which is common, and you spend way too much time in a fantasy land and not in reality with your spouse.
Allow me to clarify. I was responding to the issue of pornography and why I think women misunderstand the reason it appeals to men and also trying to explain that if women understood it, they might prevent their spouses from straying. For the record, I understand that a lasting relationship cannot be built on sex alone. But this thread is about cheating - SEXUAL CHEATING - and peoples sexual needs not getting met is a huge reason for a lot of cheating. Of course, there are a myriad of issues that could be covered on marriage and relationships and why people stray.
To your point, of course it's a two street and a man should be willing to do what his spouse/SO wants in bed, fulfilling her fantasies, if she has any. (My ex swore for 23 years she didn't have any. In counseling workbooks we did, she listed "none" on the question of sexual fantasies. She was simply an unimaginative and boring person. Took me a long time to figure it out, obviously).
I also understand that women don't want a kink-fest every time they make love. In fact, neither do I. Many times it's nice for it to be slow, soft and romantic with a deep emotional connection. It is nice to occasionally have NO SEX at all and just snuggle up to each other and feel safe, loved and cared for. Most women want a man who can be gentle, loving, patient and understanding, in and out of the bedroom. I get it, and I try to be that kind of man to the woman I love.
Now, when the above examples are ALL a man gets - which is typical for most married couples - I guarantee you the typical horny man will feel something is missing, and he will either resign himself to a life of miserable, boring sex, constrained by his vows and the desire to preserve his family, or he will look for an outlet via porn or real life. Bottom line, it's nice to know that your wife/SO is WILLING and ENTHUSIASTIC about trying new things when you want to, and in fact might come up with a few ideas herself once in a while. Come to think of it, it's not really about trying 'new' things, but just doing the same old things with ENTHUSIASM and DESIRE.
I will concede that some men are okay with plain vanilla sex. Your husband appears to be one of them. Some men have a low sex drive and are quite satisfied with sex a few times a month, or even less. I'm getting close to 50 and, thankfully, I'm not one of them.
A female view wrote:
I keep hearing "I want a freak in bed," "Act like a porn star," etc. It's great if the Mr. & Mrs. want to swing from the rafters (and if both are into that every time, great). But the Mrs. shouldn't be expected to be Linda Lovelace 4-5 times a week, especially if that's not what SHE wants. Gentlemen, it's O.K. to satisfy her needs and fantasies once in awhile. Sex can be a form of communication between two people. If it is all about fantasy and porn, then it really doesn't matter who's in bed with you, does it? The Mrs. doesn't always like to feel that way. Compromise, and don't go to bed with these porn star expectations EVERY time. She'll feel like a failure or disappointment, and will be a lot less interested in having sex with you.
I once told my husband I never wanted to feel as if I ignored the housework, didn't make dinner and put the kids to bed filthy, he would still be happy so long as I put out like a prostitute 4-5 times a week. In other words, when you complement or thank her, be sincere about it - don't use it as a means just to get laid.
By the way, in couples counseling, we were warned off porn, for many of the reasons I allude to. Creates unreasonable expectations, depersonalizes sex and your partner, and skews your view of what sex should be. Get addicted, which is common, and you spend way too much time in a fantasy land and not in reality with your spouse.
1) "the freak in the bed" "pornstar" thing is quite a bit exaggerated. Very few men demand that from their wives, so yes, it was brought up, but it is mostly irrelevant. MOST men simply want a sex life similar to the dating life they had with their wives. Often that doesn't happen. Or a sex life similar to some of their previous dating lives. Again, that often doesn't happen. So these aren't fantasies they are shooting for, but realities they actually experienced. OR they want their wives to enjoy going down on them as much as they enjoy going down on their wives, etc. Again... often not happening. men don't want their wives to treat sex as something they are willing to do, but as something they REALLY WANT TO DO. Passion. YEs, they want to be wanted and enjoyed sexually the way they want and enjoy their wife. They even simply want their wives to look at them the way they once did, and yes, believe it or not, hug/cuddle them/love them, etc. (and sure, then all the sex on top of that). I don't think any of that is asking too much, but apparently, it is, often for men who are doing everything they can for their wives. (now, don't bother telling me that sometimes the shoe is on the other foot. I know that. But I am talking about male complaints, and they are what I listed above: they want more physical attraction coming from their wives, more physical bonding of all sorts, more ENJOYING sex and WANTING sex, regularly having PASSIONATE sex (for most men, even 2-3 times a week is great), etc
2) you say that a woman shouldn't have to do something if that is not "what SHE wants." Well sure, that is mostly true, but where is the line drawn on that? What if she decides the only sexual act she is comfortable with is missionary, once a week, end of discussion. That would be pretty unreasonable for most men. And wouldn't the rules apply the other way? A man could say; hey, a man shouldn't be expected to be a house-cleaner or dish-washer every day if that's "not what HE wants." Where is the line drawn? On who's likes/dislikes/whims/rules are the "I shouldn't have to do that if I'm not into it" based on? It's a tricky business.
3) you say: "In other words, when you complement or thank her, be sincere about it - don't use it as a means just to get laid. " that can be flipped around: when YOU have sex with your husband and do things to him that he really wants you to be into (and I am talking basics here, nothing radical), then YOU need to actually sincerely enjoy it and don't just pretend to or go through the motions so you can get him to do stuff or say stuff to you that you want out of him, right? Two-way street. If you going through the motions/faking it, he might as well pay for it and get the same thing .
4) why did you have to go to couples counseling? What went wrong?
Bottom line: people get married, for the most part, because of a deep physical, and emotional, connection. Sure, both parts need to be fulfilled on both sides. But the reality is: many women seem to act completely differently, in a physical/passion sense, during their dating lives than they do during their married lives, and/or, refuse to try and grow in their sexual lives (if they were fairly prudish to begin with). Instead they put their supposed physical attraction and bond with their husband way on the back burner, and maybe just go through the motions in that area to avoid conflict. That's not healthy, and it shouldn't be that way. People get bored, and familiarity, while not always breeding contempt, can at least breed less passion towards your spouse. But with even a little work, I think couples should have the same passion towards each other as they always did. And particularly as people get into their late 30's/early to mid 40's, and maybe are looking at other attractive members of the opposite sex, and feeling a little old, and pondering their fun dating/hook-up lives of their college days and early 20's and comparing that to the lack of passion they are experiencing now.....then that is the time more than ever to try and rekindle all that. And yes, men have a big role to play there, but if women are simply not up to the task of being into romance/sex/passion like they used to, or promised they always would be...then that will simply be very harmful to the marriage resulting in either cheating, divorce, or a fairly unhappy marriage.
So yes ladies, a big part of that is on you.
I hear that watching porn sometimes gets women more in the mood and willing to be more adventurous?
(the last part is 1/2 of a joke! Actually, I guarantee you that in many cases it is actually true. But I am not entirely discounting your views on porn. In many cases it can be harmful for people/relationships. But it is not always this way. My wife doesn't care at all that I watch porn. I don't watch that much, but, she simply doesn't care one iota) .
for the record wrote:
A female view wrote:I keep hearing "I want a freak in bed," "Act like a porn star," etc. It's great if the Mr. & Mrs. want to swing from the rafters (and if both are into that every time, great). But the Mrs. shouldn't be expected to be Linda Lovelace 4-5 times a week, especially if that's not what SHE wants. Gentlemen, it's O.K. to satisfy her needs and fantasies once in awhile. Sex can be a form of communication between two people. If it is all about fantasy and porn, then it really doesn't matter who's in bed with you, does it? The Mrs. doesn't always like to feel that way. Compromise, and don't go to bed with these porn star expectations EVERY time. She'll feel like a failure or disappointment, and will be a lot less interested in having sex with you.
I once told my husband I never wanted to feel as if I ignored the housework, didn't make dinner and put the kids to bed filthy, he would still be happy so long as I put out like a prostitute 4-5 times a week. In other words, when you complement or thank her, be sincere about it - don't use it as a means just to get laid.
By the way, in couples counseling, we were warned off porn, for many of the reasons I allude to. Creates unreasonable expectations, depersonalizes sex and your partner, and skews your view of what sex should be. Get addicted, which is common, and you spend way too much time in a fantasy land and not in reality with your spouse.
1) "the freak in the bed" "pornstar" thing is quite a bit exaggerated. Very few men demand that from their wives, so yes, it was brought up, but it is mostly irrelevant. MOST men simply want a sex life similar to the dating life they had with their wives. Often that doesn't happen. Or a sex life similar to some of their previous dating lives. Again, that often doesn't happen. So these aren't fantasies they are shooting for, but realities they actually experienced. OR they want their wives to enjoy going down on them as much as they enjoy going down on their wives, etc. Again... often not happening. men don't want their wives to treat sex as something they are willing to do, but as something they REALLY WANT TO DO. Passion. YEs, they want to be wanted and enjoyed sexually the way they want and enjoy their wife. They even simply want their wives to look at them the way they once did, and yes, believe it or not, hug/cuddle them/love them, etc. (and sure, then all the sex on top of that). I don't think any of that is asking too much, but apparently, it is, often for men who are doing everything they can for their wives. (now, don't bother telling me that sometimes the shoe is on the other foot. I know that. But I am talking about male complaints, and they are what I listed above: they want more physical attraction coming from their wives, more physical bonding of all sorts, more ENJOYING sex and WANTING sex, regularly having PASSIONATE sex (for most men, even 2-3 times a week is great), etc
2) you say that a woman shouldn't have to do something if that is not "what SHE wants." Well sure, that is mostly true, but where is the line drawn on that? What if she decides the only sexual act she is comfortable with is missionary, once a week, end of discussion. That would be pretty unreasonable for most men. And wouldn't the rules apply the other way? A man could say; hey, a man shouldn't be expected to be a house-cleaner or dish-washer every day if that's "not what HE wants." Where is the line drawn? On who's likes/dislikes/whims/rules are the "I shouldn't have to do that if I'm not into it" based on? It's a tricky business.
3) you say: "In other words, when you complement or thank her, be sincere about it - don't use it as a means just to get laid. " that can be flipped around: when YOU have sex with your husband and do things to him that he really wants you to be into (and I am talking basics here, nothing radical), then YOU need to actually sincerely enjoy it and don't just pretend to or go through the motions so you can get him to do stuff or say stuff to you that you want out of him, right? Two-way street. If you going through the motions/faking it, he might as well pay for it and get the same thing .
4) why did you have to go to couples counseling? What went wrong?
Bottom line: people get married, for the most part, because of a deep physical, and emotional, connection. Sure, both parts need to be fulfilled on both sides. But the reality is: many women seem to act completely differently, in a physical/passion sense, during their dating lives than they do during their married lives, and/or, refuse to try and grow in their sexual lives (if they were fairly prudish to begin with). Instead they put their supposed physical attraction and bond with their husband way on the back burner, and maybe just go through the motions in that area to avoid conflict. That's not healthy, and it shouldn't be that way. People get bored, and familiarity, while not always breeding contempt, can at least breed less passion towards your spouse. But with even a little work, I think couples should have the same passion towards each other as they always did. And particularly as people get into their late 30's/early to mid 40's, and maybe are looking at other attractive members of the opposite sex, and feeling a little old, and pondering their fun dating/hook-up lives of their college days and early 20's and comparing that to the lack of passion they are experiencing now.....then that is the time more than ever to try and rekindle all that. And yes, men have a big role to play there, but if women are simply not up to the task of being into romance/sex/passion like they used to, or promised they always would be...then that will simply be very harmful to the marriage resulting in either cheating, divorce, or a fairly unhappy marriage.
So yes ladies, a big part of that is on you.
I hear that watching porn sometimes gets women more in the mood and willing to be more adventurous?
(the last part is 1/2 of a joke! Actually, I guarantee you that in many cases it is actually true. But I am not entirely discounting your views on porn. In many cases it can be harmful for people/relationships. But it is not always this way. My wife doesn't care at all that I watch porn. I don't watch that much, but, she simply doesn't care one iota) .
Fantastic post. I would venture to guess that because of this phenomenon of women losing interest in sex, porn has saved way more relationships than it has ruined (by giving men some kind of outlet).
Finally, for any women that are actually reading this, I would like to add the following. Remember that time you asked your man his wildest sexual fantasy? He was lying when he answered that question. Take whatever he said and multiply it by about 100. Seriously.
A female view wrote
By the way, in couples counseling....
Sweetheart, you wouldn't be saying that if you were privy to what was going on in my bedroom Saturday morning (yea, that's right... MORNING).
Why were you in couples counseling?
I'm curious, what was going on in your bedroom the other morning? Another man?
A female view wrote:
blah blah blah...
By the way, in couples counseling, we were warned off porn, for many of the reasons I allude to. Creates unreasonable expectations, depersonalizes sex and your partner, and skews your view of what sex should be. Get addicted, which is common, and you spend way too much time in a fantasy land and not in reality with your spouse.
In other words you're a "missionary in the dark under the covers" kinda gal.
ho hum booooorrrrriiiinnnng
Notice that females always post blame on their husbands. They don't talk about their waning sex drive and/or their thankless treatment of men who truly love them and would never consider cheating.
Marriage works best if you make the effort to know your spouse and be friends with them. A bit of a tall order for many.
You gotta have chemistry too.
I fell into the idiotic thing of FB messaging with an old flame and almost destroyed my marriage. I got caught. we went though a lotta pain over it.
Lucky for me, we are friends, and we do have chemistry.
So, it looks like we'll stay married.
And, after 20 years, the physical connection is really fantastic in the face of the threat to our marriage -- who knew, but this is the best and most action I've ever had!
regent wrote:
for the record wrote:1) "the freak in the bed" "pornstar" thing is quite a bit exaggerated. Very few men demand that from their wives, so yes, it was brought up, but it is mostly irrelevant. MOST men simply want a sex life similar to the dating life they had with their wives. Often that doesn't happen. Or a sex life similar to some of their previous dating lives. Again, that often doesn't happen. So these aren't fantasies they are shooting for, but realities they actually experienced. OR they want their wives to enjoy going down on them as much as they enjoy going down on their wives, etc. Again... often not happening. men don't want their wives to treat sex as something they are willing to do, but as something they REALLY WANT TO DO. Passion. YEs, they want to be wanted and enjoyed sexually the way they want and enjoy their wife. They even simply want their wives to look at them the way they once did, and yes, believe it or not, hug/cuddle them/love them, etc. (and sure, then all the sex on top of that). I don't think any of that is asking too much, but apparently, it is, often for men who are doing everything they can for their wives. (now, don't bother telling me that sometimes the shoe is on the other foot. I know that. But I am talking about male complaints, and they are what I listed above: they want more physical attraction coming from their wives, more physical bonding of all sorts, more ENJOYING sex and WANTING sex, regularly having PASSIONATE sex (for most men, even 2-3 times a week is great), etc
2) you say that a woman shouldn't have to do something if that is not "what SHE wants." Well sure, that is mostly true, but where is the line drawn on that? What if she decides the only sexual act she is comfortable with is missionary, once a week, end of discussion. That would be pretty unreasonable for most men. And wouldn't the rules apply the other way? A man could say; hey, a man shouldn't be expected to be a house-cleaner or dish-washer every day if that's "not what HE wants." Where is the line drawn? On who's likes/dislikes/whims/rules are the "I shouldn't have to do that if I'm not into it" based on? It's a tricky business.
3) you say: "In other words, when you complement or thank her, be sincere about it - don't use it as a means just to get laid. " that can be flipped around: when YOU have sex with your husband and do things to him that he really wants you to be into (and I am talking basics here, nothing radical), then YOU need to actually sincerely enjoy it and don't just pretend to or go through the motions so you can get him to do stuff or say stuff to you that you want out of him, right? Two-way street. If you going through the motions/faking it, he might as well pay for it and get the same thing .
4) why did you have to go to couples counseling? What went wrong?
Bottom line: people get married, for the most part, because of a deep physical, and emotional, connection. Sure, both parts need to be fulfilled on both sides. But the reality is: many women seem to act completely differently, in a physical/passion sense, during their dating lives than they do during their married lives, and/or, refuse to try and grow in their sexual lives (if they were fairly prudish to begin with). Instead they put their supposed physical attraction and bond with their husband way on the back burner, and maybe just go through the motions in that area to avoid conflict. That's not healthy, and it shouldn't be that way. People get bored, and familiarity, while not always breeding contempt, can at least breed less passion towards your spouse. But with even a little work, I think couples should have the same passion towards each other as they always did. And particularly as people get into their late 30's/early to mid 40's, and maybe are looking at other attractive members of the opposite sex, and feeling a little old, and pondering their fun dating/hook-up lives of their college days and early 20's and comparing that to the lack of passion they are experiencing now.....then that is the time more than ever to try and rekindle all that. And yes, men have a big role to play there, but if women are simply not up to the task of being into romance/sex/passion like they used to, or promised they always would be...then that will simply be very harmful to the marriage resulting in either cheating, divorce, or a fairly unhappy marriage.
So yes ladies, a big part of that is on you.
I hear that watching porn sometimes gets women more in the mood and willing to be more adventurous?
(the last part is 1/2 of a joke! Actually, I guarantee you that in many cases it is actually true. But I am not entirely discounting your views on porn. In many cases it can be harmful for people/relationships. But it is not always this way. My wife doesn't care at all that I watch porn. I don't watch that much, but, she simply doesn't care one iota) .
Fantastic post. I would venture to guess that because of this phenomenon of women losing interest in sex, porn has saved way more relationships than it has ruined (by giving men some kind of outlet).
Finally, for any women that are actually reading this, I would like to add the following. Remember that time you asked your man his wildest sexual fantasy? He was lying when he answered that question. Take whatever he said and multiply it by about 100. Seriously.
+1
for the record wrote:
[quote]A female view wrote:
Bottom line: people get married, for the most part, because of a deep physical, and emotional, connection. Sure, both parts need to be fulfilled on both sides. But the reality is: many women seem to act completely differently, in a physical/passion sense, during their dating lives than they do during their married lives, and/or, refuse to try and grow in their sexual lives (if they were fairly prudish to begin with). Instead they put their supposed physical attraction and bond with their husband way on the back burner, and maybe just go through the motions in that area to avoid conflict. That's not healthy, and it shouldn't be that way. People get bored, and familiarity, while not always breeding contempt, can at least breed less passion towards your spouse. But with even a little work, I think couples should have the same passion towards each other as they always did. And particularly as people get into their late 30's/early to mid 40's, and maybe are looking at other attractive members of the opposite sex, and feeling a little old, and pondering their fun dating/hook-up lives of their college days and early 20's and comparing that to the lack of passion they are experiencing now.....then that is the time more than ever to try and rekindle all that. And yes, men have a big role to play there, but if women are simply not up to the task of being into romance/sex/passion like they used to, or promised they always would be...then that will simply be very harmful to the marriage resulting in either cheating, divorce, or a fairly unhappy marriage.
So yes ladies, a big part of that is on you.
You think? Did you ever think for a split second that it might be the other way around? Oh yeah, hard to conceive ( no pun intended?) bottom line, it takes two to tango and if one makes a mistake in his/her step, it's because the other partner didn't pay attention to their details. As humans, I suppose we're not perfect, eh?
Off the record wrote:
for the record wrote:[quote]A female view wrote:
Bottom line: people get married, for the most part, because of a deep physical, and emotional, connection. Sure, both parts need to be fulfilled on both sides. But the reality is: many women seem to act completely differently, in a physical/passion sense, during their dating lives than they do during their married lives, and/or, refuse to try and grow in their sexual lives (if they were fairly prudish to begin with). Instead they put their supposed physical attraction and bond with their husband way on the back burner, and maybe just go through the motions in that area to avoid conflict. That's not healthy, and it shouldn't be that way. People get bored, and familiarity, while not always breeding contempt, can at least breed less passion towards your spouse. But with even a little work, I think couples should have the same passion towards each other as they always did. And particularly as people get into their late 30's/early to mid 40's, and maybe are looking at other attractive members of the opposite sex, and feeling a little old, and pondering their fun dating/hook-up lives of their college days and early 20's and comparing that to the lack of passion they are experiencing now.....then that is the time more than ever to try and rekindle all that. And yes, men have a big role to play there, but if women are simply not up to the task of being into romance/sex/passion like they used to, or promised they always would be...then that will simply be very harmful to the marriage resulting in either cheating, divorce, or a fairly unhappy marriage.
So yes ladies, a big part of that is on you.
You think? Did you ever think for a split second that it might be the other way around? Oh yeah, hard to conceive ( no pun intended?) bottom line, it takes two to tango and if one makes a mistake in his/her step, it's because the other partner didn't pay attention to their details. As humans, I suppose we're not perfect, eh?
He was responding to someone who said it WAS the other way around. If you were paying attention (doubtful), you'd realize his is the counterpoint to her point. He's taking her to task, but he he made it clear that BOTH men and women have a role in getting it right. Go*damn, some of you people have rocks for brains.