Walter Dix looked pissed after the race.
Walter Dix looked pissed after the race.
The New UncleB wrote:
NYRun1 wrote:no one is accusing every winner of cheating. we are accusing the outlier performances. the
flojos
lance armstrongs
mark mcguires
usain bolts and now
yohan blakes
of the world
But not Sally Pearson's 12.28??
___________________________
See you're response to any doping accusation - and remember that Blake has already been found to be a doper - is to accuse a white person.
You are one sorry SOB. And a person with an incredible inferiority complex. If you were 14 years old I might understand, but I actauly think you are over 21 years old and should know better. Note I never called you an adult. That would be obviously incorrect.
Your answer to everything is to throw someone else under the bus. What a ponce you must be in the real world.
I second that! He seems to be very insecure!
bobskinuts wrote:
The New UncleB wrote:But not Sally Pearson's 12.28??
___________________________
See you're response to any doping accusation - and remember that Blake has already been found to be a doper - is to accuse a white person.
You are one sorry SOB. And a person with an incredible inferiority complex. If you were 14 years old I might understand, but I actauly think you are over 21 years old and should know better. Note I never called you an adult. That would be obviously incorrect.
Your answer to everything is to throw someone else under the bus. What a ponce you must be in the real world.
i've noticed previously that you were incapable of reasoning. now it also appears that you are incapable of reading and added to that there is something remarkably wrong with your memory.
let me see if i can help you...
at what age was bolt when he ran 19.19? You claim 17 years of age. Are you sure about this. Go ahead feel free to check again.
it wouldn't be more impressive - if a 17 year old ever ran 19.19 - that is!
is it your argument that athlets are only tested when they participante in an event? would you care to check this assertion of yours again.
i guess you have never seen my posts pissed with flojo and marion. i do not care what nationality you are. a cheat is a cheat and it does nothing for the sport. sprints were my speciality when i used to run. these stratospheric improvements in performances are not possible without the use of PEDs
you find this a great response?
did anyone detect what drug marion used? Anyone?
Is the USA testing Jamaican's? Who in the USA is doing this? And here I was thinking it was up to WADA and each country's organization to do this.
it's only a matter of time though... feel free to get back here when the news breaks.
given that gatlin was a drug cheap - he should not even have been in the race
and you would be too if any other person besides bolt made you look as though you were running backwards.
i would so love to have bolt, gay,powell,blake and dix all fit and primed in london next year!
NYRun1 wrote:
and you would be too if any other person besides bolt made you look as though you were running backwards.
i would so love to have bolt, gay,powell,blake and dix all fit and primed in london next year!
__________________________________________
Why Gatlin, who has served double what many others have served, and not Blake, who has been found to have doped and is awaiting the final penalty?
"Phil Hersh", or whomever, late to the party.
We are the vanguard here at letsrun.com
Jamaican sprinting is now more than an affront, it is a joke. We are in the era of the absurd!
If Mullings is allowed back, the SLOWEST guy on the 4x100 team will be an intrinsic 9.8 guy!
Face it, Jamaicans--your guys are using, and not just a little bit. And no, I'm not American, so I'm not a hater. My favorite sprinter ever was Ben Johnson (Jamaican, doper), and the fastest guy ever IMHO clean was Donovan Bailey (Jamaican), or maybe Bolt if he survives testing over his career.
The real question is, how much better can they get? There is no indication that anybody has reached the limit. Every time it seems put out of reach (19.19), it is reeled in again.
While they're on this kick, I'd really like to see a sub-9.5 100m, and a sub-19.0 200m, not to mention a couple of guys running some 400's.
Why not? Maybe, like somebody else said, they're using something that isn't currently technically banned--and maybe they're not the only ones. Let's remember that pee-wee herman Lemaitre just ran a 19.8, and a tubby Dix a 19.53
I say go for it, if they can! Why not? If they're clever/corrupt enough to stay ahead of the testers, do it.
I just hope these people come clean before the die, because the more time that passes, the more difficult it is to live with a lie--and yes, not revealing the full truth is lying, in this sense.
NYRun1 wrote:
i've noticed previously that you were incapable of reasoning. now it also appears that you are incapable of reading and added to that there is something remarkably wrong with your memory.
let me see if i can help you...
at what age was bolt when he ran 19.19? You claim 17 years of age. Are you sure about this. Go ahead feel free to check again.
it wouldn't be more impressive - if a 17 year old ever ran 19.19 - that is!
my bad obviously that was a typo should have read 19.9, again 19.9 by a 17 year old Bolt is far more impressive than a 43.3 by a 19 year old James.
Doping or not, I just want to know where this came from. This year Blake has run:
9.82 (0.0)
9.82 (0.1)
9.92 (-1.4)
9.95 (0.9)
9.95 (-1.4)
None of that suggests 19.26. We've seen plenty of 9.82-ish guys in the past, Greene, Bailey, Surin, not to mention Powell and Gay are significantly faster at 9.72 and 9.69, but that doesn't get you within throwing distance of 19.2. Before this race it was:
19.19 Bolt (9.58)
19.30 Bolt
19.32 MJ (43.18)
19.40 Bolt
19.56 Bolt
19.57 Bolt
19.58 Gay (9.69)
19.62 Gay
19.63 Xavier Carter
To even get below 19.63 you had to crack 9.70 in the 100 or be the WR holder at 400. How does a 9.82 guy run 19.26??????? Does this suggest that Blake is really a 400 guy? I'm having a hard time comprehending this run unless it was mis-timed, short distance, broken wind gauge, or some other missing element.
The New UncleB wrote:
But not Sally Pearson's 12.28??
If you watch Pearson's race, her form is perfect, but her speed after the last hurdle appears to be worse than some of her competition, and she does not look muscle bound. So, neither by appearance, nor by flat speed does she seem suspect. Technique requires no drugs. Liu didn't have the greatest speed or strength, unlike Nehemiah or Oliver, at his best, yet he ran sub 12.9. Nevertheless, I'm never surprised when the best women athletes test positive or are nailed for drugs, because it has happened throughout every single event for thirty years.
ah right - senior moment not blake that drug cheat.
what was bolt's PB in the 400 as a 17 year old? what did kirani run?
let's compare apples to apples shall we?
that is what i keep saying. there is something wrong with that 19.26. I have put my money on the clock. but if the clock is correct then PED
but there is something wrong with that 19.26
and no way did tubby dix run 19.5. dix who has not been able to run sub 9.95 this year.
there is something wrong with the times!
"there is something wrong with the times!"
Agreed.
But like I said, even if it was off by .20, that was a 19.46, or 19.36 with a reasonable RT.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BTW, Blake IS essentially a 9.7x guy, he has gone 9.82 CORRECTED.
With even a tiny bit of wind he would be 9.7x, more than once.
But Dix? Like you said, he's mid-9.9x this year. 19.53 seems unreasonable. Are we supposed to believe that he would have blown away Carl Lewis at his best by .20 over the last 100m?
No way.
Bamm! wrote:
BTW, Blake IS essentially a 9.7x guy, he has gone 9.82 CORRECTED.
With even a tiny bit of wind he would be 9.7x, more than once.
But Dix? Like you said, he's mid-9.9x this year. 19.53 seems unreasonable. Are we supposed to believe that he would have blown away Carl Lewis at his best by .20 over the last 100m?
No way.
What's Carl Lewis got to do with how fast Dix runs?