How is it "ridiculous" to base a view about possible doping based on what is known about an individual athlete and what we know about the sport and the presence of doping? What else would you rely on? Tarot cards?
Because you claim to know, when you're just wildly speculating. That is delusional.
I'm not wildly speculating: I'm basing my views on what the athlete concerned is doing and what we know about the sport today. I don't claim to know whether he is doping but I am sceptical of what I am seeing. In the absence of a confirmed doping violation - for anyone - that is what we have to go on. It is used for any number of athletes discussed on this site.
This post was edited 10 minutes after it was posted.