Sleuther101 wrote:
False. You have zero comprehension. I said that they would track him by it eventually, but that they already have his photo and that someone would turn him in.
Selective reading to make yourself feel smarter and nothing more. You are taking bits and pieces and are upset because I said it first. Basically, you are just trying to prove me wrong and you failed. When it all comes out, you will see that they already had his name and the guy knew it. You will then go into hiding, I won't. For you to not understand that makes you----not too smart.
Without his photo, they still would have eventually gotten him, believe it or not. But as I posted, with his photo he will 100% be turned in by more than one person...and he was. You don't know anything about cell phone analytics and that's not my fault, it's yours.
Yeah, rojo cannot seem to understand that they can go backwards in time with CCTV locations, nor can he understand that at those locations and times there would be cell phone pinging data. Take several locations and you will end up with one common cell phone, with which you can now go back with right to when it was first activated. Match that with CCTV and you have solid identity via photos. At some point unless he knew not to do it, he may have had his own registered phone with the burner. Phones will ping whether you use it or not.
It is really not rocket science, once again, cops aren't that smart, they just follow process.