Lol Americans don’t want to work in agriculture/the fields. Immigrants usually take up the jobs Americans DON’T want to do. There’s plenty of jobs in the fields, if an American wants to work out there …
Lol why mention “when there were two genders” … What does someone else claiming to be non-binary or whatever have to do with you and your life? Literally affects you in zero ways. 🙄
Are you kidding or just ignorant?
Nikki complains if a broadcaster doesn't use her preferred pronouns.
Forcing someone to change the manner in which they speak just to satisfy a small minority is not trivial.
Lol why mention “when there were two genders” … What does someone else claiming to be non-binary or whatever have to do with you and your life? Literally affects you in zero ways. 🙄
In many situations nowadays, I have to introduce my pronouns and remember to refer to someone else as they/them. Call it a small thing but it was nice back when people didn't believe in that stuff.
What if her pregnancy was due to rape by a black man? Should she abort or not?
She should, but it still ought to be up to the states.
In an ideal world there would be a White ethnostate and that wouldn't be possible because the black wouldn't be allowed within the borders.
The up to states excuse won’t go very far. If federal government cannot decide, why would states need to? Why cannot we defer this further to the cities, villages, or HOA? Also, in an ideal world, there may be a a white woman raped by her drug addictive father, so this problem would still need an answer.
She should, but it still ought to be up to the states.
In an ideal world there would be a White ethnostate and that wouldn't be possible because the black wouldn't be allowed within the borders.
The up to states excuse won’t go very far. If federal government cannot decide, why would states need to? Why cannot we defer this further to the cities, villages, or HOA? Also, in an ideal world, there may be a a white woman raped by her drug addictive father, so this problem would still need an answer.
The answer to your question is found in the 10th Amendment.
Federalism means that the national government has clearly defined duties and powers set forth in the Constitution.
All others - including abortion - are left to the states or the people.
The up to states excuse won’t go very far. If federal government cannot decide, why would states need to? Why cannot we defer this further to the cities, villages, or HOA? Also, in an ideal world, there may be a a white woman raped by her drug addictive father, so this problem would still need an answer.
The answer to your question is found in the 10th Amendment.
Federalism means that the national government has clearly defined duties and powers set forth in the Constitution.
All others - including abortion - are left to the states or the people.
That is why Roe was unconstitutional.
A national abortion ban would be similarly unconstitutional.
I swear, they must not teach civics in our schools anymore.
The answer to your question is found in the 10th Amendment.
Federalism means that the national government has clearly defined duties and powers set forth in the Constitution.
All others - including abortion - are left to the states or the people.
That is why Roe was unconstitutional.
A national abortion ban would be similarly unconstitutional.
I swear, they must not teach civics in our schools anymore.
Now, if Roe fans wanted to draft a constitutional amendment using Justice Blackmun's language, and could get it ratified - that would be constitutional.
Trump has mentioned doing away with income tax in favor of (consumption-driven) tariffs. (In addition to the tariffs he's already talking about.)
This is among the only things he's ever said that I agree with.
Here's betting this never happens, though, and if it does, is geared so a rich dude buying a jet pays no tax, and I pay out the wazoo when I buy Scotch tape at Walmart.
She should, but it still ought to be up to the states.
In an ideal world there would be a White ethnostate and that wouldn't be possible because the black wouldn't be allowed within the borders.
The up to states excuse won’t go very far. If federal government cannot decide, why would states need to? Why cannot we defer this further to the cities, villages, or HOA? Also, in an ideal world, there may be a a white woman raped by her drug addictive father, so this problem would still need an answer.
States can, if they choose, leave it up to cities, counties, townships or whatever. If you need a quick lesson on US government: Municipal governments are creations of states and derive their authority from states. It wouldn't make sense, or be constitutionally possible, for the federal government to "leave it up to the cities." By "leaving it up to the states," what that really means is the federal government is not taking a stance on the issue.
Not an expert on this but I have read some arguments against them that seem to make sense.
I’m going to speak very plainly. I work in an industry that is an essential industry. The main products we use in my industry are imported, and the equivalent American product is significantly lower in quality. We will be looking at paying 10-20% more for these products. These costs will be passed on to the consumer. The sad part is that people will likely choose to consume different products. My family’s company has been active for years over 125 years, and I really feel like this would be the nail in the coffin for us. I don’t really care one way or the other on most political issues, but the threat of these tariffs has me sick with worry. I worry about my employees, and I worry about being the first in 5 generations to completely fail. I sincerely hope that these tariffs do not materialize as this country is not presently equipped for manufacturing, and because many products we rely on are imports.
Unless they are high enough - like 50% - it won't shift anything domestically and just raise prices. On most things we import, the difference is so high there is no incentive for domestic companies to shift supply chains.
The goal would to move production to the US and employ more US workers. The problem is the automation levels in the US compared to Chinese or other countries is much higher so you'll basically move 50 jobs from overseas to the US for 10 jobs at a 40% price increase. Idk it could work for somethings but not everything why tariffs usually are targeted at strategic industries.
A better strategy would incentives via tax write offs to companies buying/making things domestically and heavily tax companies like Apple who sell Chinese made products.
The goal would to move production to the US and employ more US workers. The problem is the automation levels in the US compared to Chinese or other countries is much higher so you'll basically move 50 jobs from overseas to the US for 10 jobs at a 40% price increase.
Automation is higher in China than the US... MUCH higher. If anything we need to bring industries back so we stop falling so far behind technologically.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.