The King of Physics wrote:
You see there you go being sneaky again. You have never said nor implied any athlete should choose to dope against all moral conscience instead you rather said so only against aplicable rules and laws which then means you have subliminally given your consent for them to dope in between these applicable rules and laws as still a way to bypass them but doping nonetheless!!
Khamis was right about you, don’t be throwing shade at him when he is just trying to keep the sport clean while you are tactfully not!
I'm not really understanding what you are accusing me of here. If something is allowed by both rules and laws, I have nothing to say one way or another. Runners can "dope" with bananas and coca-cola to their hearts content. This does not require my consent.
I am trying to understand what are the relevant and significant factors causing elite performances. For some reason, this threatens those who cannot explain why they believe things they cannot support with objective data, so they fabricate and gullibly believe alternative lies about my motives and character.