I hope everyone reads this:
"The Female category is for females. The entire purpose of it is to exclude male advantage, thereby allowing for fair and safe competition amongst females. The acceptable number of males in the Female category is zero. If you begin the debate about how much of an issue it is, you have already conceded that some males in the Female category is acceptable. "
The thing that scares me is that college administrators ever thought this was a good idea.
Rojo wrote:
The thing that scares me is that college administrators ever thought this was a good idea.
It’s more likely that they were scared of losing their jobs over looking like a bigot.
rojo wrote:
I hope everyone reads this:
"The Female category is for females. The entire purpose of it is to exclude male advantage, thereby allowing for fair and safe competition amongst females. The acceptable number of males in the Female category is zero. If you begin the debate about how much of an issue it is, you have already conceded that some males in the Female category is acceptable. "
The thing that scares me is that college administrators ever thought this was a good idea.
If you care so much about this issue, ask Max Siegel, Vin Lanana or any of the USATF board members whether USATF is enforcing the new World Athletics policy. If they do, that will also become the NCAA Track & Field policy and this D3 sprinter will be declared ineligible next season.
USATF probably does not care because no trans athlete will qualify for the Olympic Trial. But their policy also affects the lower level competition including NCAA., which they may not care about.
