eric a blair wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
AND...........as far as I'm aware, most everyone that has met HRC has a personal dislike of her
absurd. HRC has an amazingly loyal group of people who worked with her over the years. They stick with her because they admire and respect and like her.
Amazingly loyal cause they will do anything for the money that falls to HRC (with some pittance to them) and the Clinton crime family like water over a waterfall.
DiscoGary wrote:
... and I want to point out that I listed "the bureaucracy" as one of the enemies Trump would face if elected. Very few people were talking about this, but now we see what a battle with a corrupt bureaucracy looks like. I always considered the bureaucracy to be Trump's deadliest foe because it can draw on the full knowledge of the surveillance state (and it has done so, illegally) and operates with the authority of law while conducting political persecutions. We are witnessing an epic battle, and it's outcome will have long lasting consequences for the future of our democracy.
Trump must win.
Crazy, Insanity, Dementia, Mental illness, Derangement, Dotage. On full display.
Good job!
PIO! wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
... and I want to point out that I listed "the bureaucracy" as one of the enemies Trump would face if elected. Very few people were talking about this, but now we see what a battle with a corrupt bureaucracy looks like. I always considered the bureaucracy to be Trump's deadliest foe because it can draw on the full knowledge of the surveillance state (and it has done so, illegally) and operates with the authority of law while conducting political persecutions. We are witnessing an epic battle, and it's outcome will have long lasting consequences for the future of our democracy.
Trump must win.
Crazy, Insanity, Dementia, Mental illness, Derangement, Dotage. On full display.
Good job!
You should make some predictions. Put your ideas to the test.
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
There goes Steve Bannon with another attempt at autofellatio. He'll get there one day. Go Steve, go!
This is a power play. We'll slowly start to see that this isn't the party of Trump, it's just a party of lunatics whose opinions practically change with the breeze. A lot of Trump supporters hate Kushner (not because he's Jewish, oh no, certainly not that) and they don't really care about any of the Trump kids except Ivanka, who they like too google and oogle. Bannon is clearly banking on them being just stupid enough to believe that throwing Trump's family under the bus isn't the same as throwing Trump himself under the bus, and he must be extremely confident that Jared and Junior are up to their eyeballs in sh*t.
He's offering Trump supporters a lifeboat in the form of his potential 2020 candidacy, just like the Tea Party offered an out for all of the disillusioned Bush supporters back in the day. "I never liked the tweeting, I was just more of a general Breitbart follower. Bannon's my guy! It was always Bannon!"
All of this clearly calls for an investigation into Hillary Clinton's behavior as Secretary of State.
Diaper rash has set in, bigly. Trump has issued a mature and very presidential statement that goes off on Bannon. You can practically feel the flecks of spittle on your face as you read it. President Degenerative Brain Disease probably shouldn't be casually speculating about the mental health of others, but I don't think he has the capacity to understand irony at this point.
Today has been a very good day for places like Fox News and the Daily Caller. Bannon doesn't appear to be getting much support from his precious comments section. I suspect that will change in due time, but perhaps he's gone and finally finished himself off...
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
[quote]Flagpole wrote:
[quote]OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
I don't happen to agree with anything you have to say about the matter at hand thus my commentary. No conspiracy, no indictment, no collusion, no dirt, no impeachment. So I assume that you also think the "pee tape" is real. We can agree to disagree, thats fine. When the dust settles, we'll see who's right, but your track record in regards to predicting things related to Trump isn't real strong shall we say.
1) Collusion is already shown. Whether it rises to the level of a conspiracy charge is yet to be seen.
2) An indictment is a legal issue. We will see which way this goes...either just through the Congress and House or also through the courts. Possibility of not just federal crimes here but also state ones.
3) I do not know if the pee pee tape exists or not. So far in the Steele Dossier, many things have been proven true and nothing has been proven false, so if I had to guess, I would say it exists, but I am not adamant about that, and while weird, I actually don't hold that against him as much as him announcing that he grabs women by the p*ssy without their consent and that he walks backstage at pageants so he can see the contestants naked, or a whole host of other things.
4) Any previous predictions about Trump have no bearing on any current or future predictions. Also, if there was proven collusion with Russia to get him elected, then I was right about the 2016 election. Time will tell on that one too.
I think you will be very surprised by the findings. You should at least acknowledge that there's a good chance Trump will be caught up in financial crimes (likely money laundering) as his ties to Russia there and Deutsche Bank are great and seemingly pretty visible. A President should never be in a compromised position by another country, so if there is evidence of a financial crime that shows that Russia has him by the short and curlies, that should be an impeachable offense (high crimes and misdemeanors would apply here for sure).
So, we will see. I don't see how he can avoid an obstruction of justice charge either.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Pee Tape is Real wrote:
It's called reading between the lines.
“My daughter, Ivanka. She’s 6 feet tall, she’s got the best body. She made a lot money as a model—a tremendous amount.”
"I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."
"Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father . . .’”
"“What’s the favorite thing you have in common with your father?” Ivanka replies, “Either real estate or golf.” When it was Trump’s turn to answer the question, he said, “I was going to say sex but I can’t relate that to her.”
Trump: “My daughter is beautiful, Ivanka."
Stern: “By the way, your daughter…”
Trump: “ - she’s beautiful"
Stern: “Can I say this? A piece of ass.”
Trump: “Yeah.”
https://www.dailydot.com/wp-content/uploads/86e/82/ZBlNJPHpghJJRuS-800x450-noPad.jpghttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/C5YkZ2dU0AA6VZF.jpgYes thats a stretch, from saying some stupid things to a charge of molestation. Please.
Perhaps, but it's beyond weird, disgusting, and gross.
Flagpole wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
[quote]Flagpole wrote:
[quote]OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
I don't happen to agree with anything you have to say about the matter at hand thus my commentary. No conspiracy, no indictment, no collusion, no dirt, no impeachment. So I assume that you also think the "pee tape" is real. We can agree to disagree, thats fine. When the dust settles, we'll see who's right, but your track record in regards to predicting things related to Trump isn't real strong shall we say.
1) Collusion is already shown. Whether it rises to the level of a conspiracy charge is yet to be seen.
2) An indictment is a legal issue. We will see which way this goes...either just through the Congress and House or also through the courts. Possibility of not just federal crimes here but also state ones.
3) I do not know if the pee pee tape exists or not. So far in the Steele Dossier, many things have been proven true and nothing has been proven false, so if I had to guess, I would say it exists, but I am not adamant about that, and while weird, I actually don't hold that against him as much as him announcing that he grabs women by the p*ssy without their consent and that he walks backstage at pageants so he can see the contestants naked, or a whole host of other things.
4) Any previous predictions about Trump have no bearing on any current or future predictions. Also, if there was proven collusion with Russia to get him elected, then I was right about the 2016 election. Time will tell on that one too.
I think you will be very surprised by the findings. You should at least acknowledge that there's a good chance Trump will be caught up in financial crimes (likely money laundering) as his ties to Russia there and Deutsche Bank are great and seemingly pretty visible. A President should never be in a compromised position by another country, so if there is evidence of a financial crime that shows that Russia has him by the short and curlies, that should be an impeachable offense (high crimes and misdemeanors would apply here for sure).
So, we will see. I don't see how he can avoid an obstruction of justice charge either.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
I do not acknowledge anything in the absence of ironclad evidence. We shall see, but don't bet on it.
Flagpole wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Yes thats a stretch, from saying some stupid things to a charge of molestation. Please.
Perhaps, but it's beyond weird, disgusting, and gross.
Never said it wasn't. But then again, Stern can bring out the worst in just about anyone.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) Collusion is already shown. Whether it rises to the level of a conspiracy charge is yet to be seen.
2) An indictment is a legal issue. We will see which way this goes...either just through the Congress and House or also through the courts. Possibility of not just federal crimes here but also state ones.
3) I do not know if the pee pee tape exists or not. So far in the Steele Dossier, many things have been proven true and nothing has been proven false, so if I had to guess, I would say it exists, but I am not adamant about that, and while weird, I actually don't hold that against him as much as him announcing that he grabs women by the p*ssy without their consent and that he walks backstage at pageants so he can see the contestants naked, or a whole host of other things.
4) Any previous predictions about Trump have no bearing on any current or future predictions. Also, if there was proven collusion with Russia to get him elected, then I was right about the 2016 election. Time will tell on that one too.
I think you will be very surprised by the findings. You should at least acknowledge that there's a good chance Trump will be caught up in financial crimes (likely money laundering) as his ties to Russia there and Deutsche Bank are great and seemingly pretty visible. A President should never be in a compromised position by another country, so if there is evidence of a financial crime that shows that Russia has him by the short and curlies, that should be an impeachable offense (high crimes and misdemeanors would apply here for sure).
So, we will see. I don't see how he can avoid an obstruction of justice charge either.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
I do not acknowledge anything in the absence of ironclad evidence. We shall see, but don't bet on it.
Yes you do. You refer to the "Clinton Crime Family" and you believe many of the unproven things about them yet you won't acknowledge all the many things Trump has already been found guilty of in his past. And Trump has a federal investigation going on him that has borne some very big fruit against him so far. Flynn didn't get that sweetheart deal to turn on Hope Hicks. Take your blinders off and eat your bucket of oats.
You know, I don't know your mother, but for you to have "SOB" in your username is disrespectful to her. If she is indeed a b!tch, then you should find a way to let it go somehow, and if she isn't, then you should change your user name.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
GDP was already growing at more than 3% before the corporate tax rate was cut. GDP could be growing at 5+% by the 2018 midterms.
Trump is winning.
DiscoGary wrote:
... and I want to point out that I listed "the bureaucracy" as one of the enemies Trump would face if elected. Very few people were talking about this, but now we see what a battle with a corrupt bureaucracy looks like. I always considered the bureaucracy to be Trump's deadliest foe because it can draw on the full knowledge of the surveillance state (and it has done so, illegally) and operates with the authority of law while conducting political persecutions. We are witnessing an epic battle, and it's outcome will have long lasting consequences for the future of our democracy.
Trump must win.
Funny Mark Steyn post on the permanent bureaucracy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt3xuVtgmv4DiscoGary wrote:
GDP was already growing at more than 3% before the corporate tax rate was cut. GDP could be growing at 5+% by the 2018 midterms.
And then inflation increases dramatically leading to a recession...
As usual with trickle down economics, the blue collar worker will be screwed. That will guarantee no 2nd term for Trump, assuming he lasts that long.
foo wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
GDP was already growing at more than 3% before the corporate tax rate was cut. GDP could be growing at 5+% by the 2018 midterms.
And then inflation increases dramatically leading to a recession...
As usual with trickle down economics, the blue collar worker will be screwed. That will guarantee no 2nd term for Trump, assuming he lasts that long.
Did you cash out all your stocks yet?
foo wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
GDP was already growing at more than 3% before the corporate tax rate was cut. GDP could be growing at 5+% by the 2018 midterms.
And then inflation increases dramatically leading to a recession...
As usual with trickle down economics, the blue collar worker will be screwed. That will guarantee no 2nd term for Trump, assuming he lasts that long.
Wrong. The FED will raise interest rates in 2018, to keep inflation in check.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/business/economy/fed-rate-increases.htmlFlagpole wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
I do not acknowledge anything in the absence of ironclad evidence. We shall see, but don't bet on it.
Yes you do. You refer to the "Clinton Crime Family" and you believe many of the unproven things about them yet you won't acknowledge all the many things Trump has already been found guilty of in his past. And Trump has a federal investigation going on him that has borne some very big fruit against him so far. Flynn didn't get that sweetheart deal to turn on Hope Hicks. Take your blinders off and eat your bucket of oats.
You know, I don't know your mother, but for you to have "SOB" in your username is disrespectful to her. If she is indeed a b!tch, then you should find a way to let it go somehow, and if she isn't, then you should change your user name.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
That post was well done and fun reading.
DiscoGary wrote:
GDP was already growing at more than 3% before the corporate tax rate was cut. GDP could be growing at 5+% by the 2018 midterms.
Trump is winning.
But where will that growth be allocated, evenly among Americans or concentrated at the top?
L L wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
GDP was already growing at more than 3% before the corporate tax rate was cut. GDP could be growing at 5+% by the 2018 midterms.
Trump is winning.
But where will that growth be allocated, evenly among Americans or concentrated at the top?
With deregulation, tax cuts, and increased optimism, we're going to see wage growth like we haven't seen in decades.
It's unfortunate that we saw no wage growth during the very slow Obama "recovery," so you're right to question it.
foo fighter wrote:
foo wrote:
And then inflation increases dramatically leading to a recession...
As usual with trickle down economics, the blue collar worker will be screwed. That will guarantee no 2nd term for Trump, assuming he lasts that long.
Wrong. The FED will raise interest rates in 2018, to keep inflation in check.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/03/business/economy/fed-rate-increases.html
And still get to 5% GDP growth? Unlikely.
