We don't need a million thread on this topic. We like one thread per topic. We merged several others into this thread including one called "Alex Pretti was a deranged lunatic." and one called "New York Times reports that Pretti attacked ICE cars 11 days before his death" and one called "LeBron James: Why hasn't he commented on the Alex Pretti killing?"
My apologies. I was confused and must be wrong. I thought you were the poster who responded with specific numbers regarding the initial conversation surrounding that balanced article and poll. Someone said less than 260 people polled agreed. My mistake.
There were indeed fewer than 260 people that responded to the newspaper poll stating they support ICE.
People should talk a bit more about this. A lot of poor whites are getting really, really mad at Trump because things are very expensive. pic.twitter.com/r0HR6oM3MV
Hold the fort! It sounds like you are in possession of more relevant information. Care to pull on that thread a little? Is there any other relevant information avaliable to make a more determined assessment of a very serious situation. Or are you just always flip about everything ?
Why won’t you answer the questions? They’re simple yes/no
Why hasn’t LeBron James commented on the death of Alex Pretti when he’s previously been outspoken on the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Ma’Khia Bryant? And what factors might explain the difference in his public responses?
So many of his fellow NBA cohort have already spoken up and expressed outrage for Pretti and Ms. Good, yet Mr. James, despite his stature as a leading voice in the league, has been oddly silent.
Hold the fort! It sounds like you are in possession of more relevant information. Care to pull on that thread a little? Is there any other relevant information avaliable to make a more determined assessment of a very serious situation. Or are you just always flip about everything ?
Why won’t you answer the questions? They’re simple yes/no
When Pretti was shot:
was he armed?
was he on his back?
I already answered your hypotheticals many posts ago. I don’t know why you want me to repeat myself. Have you thought more on if any other factors were involved or was this just a mere random act of violence.
Why won’t you answer the questions? They’re simple yes/no
When Pretti was shot:
was he armed?
was he on his back?
I already answered your hypotheticals many posts ago. I don’t know why you want me to repeat myself. Have you thought more on if any other factors were involved or was this just a mere random act of violence.
No you didn’t. You refused to take a stand. Please answer or it’s clear you’re an NPC with no internal belief system
I already answered your hypotheticals many posts ago. I don’t know why you want me to repeat myself. Have you thought more on if any other factors were involved or was this just a mere random act of violence.
No you didn’t. You refused to take a stand. Please answer or it’s clear you’re an NPC with no internal belief system
In your hypothetical situation of a random unarmed person reading the newspaper on a park bench getting shot from behind it is unacceptable.
If there were factors greater than that I would have to make a more determined assessment. This is getting repetitive, I’ve already stated these things.
Is there any chance of something more happening that lead to the particular set of circumstances we are discussing?
I can play the concern trolling endless question asking game better than they can. I’ll run them off soon enough
Quite possibly yes. Cell phones are common detonating devices and when the felon came back to the scene loaded for a War and did not tell us, we had to make a judgement call and eliminate the threat. plus deranged people were blowing 10 cent whistles non stop in our ears which caused added confusion. I would arrest and prosecute for manslaughter every single person who was at the scene blowing whistles and give the Fed a golden badge of honor. But, then again, unlike Pretti and many defending him, I am a lawful gun owner…so we see things differently.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Running a country through intimidation means that nobody questions your authority. You are surrounded by an air of invincibility.
But MAGA has grown smaller in stature each and every day. Killing people and beating them was supposed to send the pipsqueaks scurrying, not to embolden them.
Now we get to watch MAGA try to punch its way out of quicksand.
Running a country through intimidation means that nobody questions your authority. You are surrounded by an air of invincibility.
But MAGA has grown smaller in stature each and every day. Killing people and beating them was supposed to send the pipsqueaks scurrying, not to embolden them.
Now we get to watch MAGA try to punch its way out of quicksand.
The delusions in your mind, now some 10 years and running are quite remarkable. Are you able to hold a job in your condition?
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.