Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

2nd opinion wrote:

Napolean Complex Much wrote:

2nd opinion>Hi Flagpole How many handles are you going to use?

No, I think he's left of center, but you're intellectually under a rock!

This is why you guys never have decent discussions about the real issues, you call everyone a liar, but yourselves.

You guys are so fearful of flagpole, you are thinking that every post is from flagpole. You have flagpole paranoia. It actually is very funny.

No I am not flagpole and the guy claiming to be left of center is a republican liar.

I agree with all of the Right on this Site, you FP are a sore loser along with your many alter egos. How does losing feel? Corrupt Hillary is going down and Barrack got lucky (he just uses race). President Trump will do more good than both of them combined. There are about 3 active Liberals on this thread and a bunch of different handles, which proves their insecurity over trying to get others to agree with their illogical statements. Eat crow Mr. Guarantee, you lost.

First Opinion wrote:

2nd opinion wrote:

You guys are so fearful of flagpole, you are thinking that every post is from flagpole. You have flagpole paranoia. It actually is very funny.

No I am not flagpole and the guy claiming to be left of center is a republican liar.

I agree with all of the Right on this Site, you FP are a sore loser along with your many alter egos. How does losing feel? Corrupt Hillary is going down and Barrack got lucky (he just uses race). President Trump will do more good than both of them combined. There are about 3 active Liberals on this thread and a bunch of different handles, which proves their insecurity over trying to get others to agree with their illogical statements. Eat crow Mr. Guarantee, you lost.

I suppose the obsession with Hillary, Obama and Bill is going to make sense when Trump is done. Let me guess, am I also flagpole??? And where has DFF been? that exemplary Republican and defender of We The People..

1) Yes, Presidents can abuse their power. Trump is under investigation because he did that (Comey firing).

2) Deutsche Bank has ties to Russia! Go read up if you don't know about that.

3) Hillary is irrelevant. Again, if someone wants to charge her with something and she did it, then she should be punished, and I will glad that someone who broke the law got caught. All the talk about Hillary is just diversion from the Great Evil Orange One.

4) Yes. Really. I do not have cable television, and even when I did, I didn't watch MSNBC. Too partisan for me.

Papadopolous told an Australian diplomat in May 2016 that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton. One of the several reasons that the FBI opened an investigation...was not based on the Steele Dossier.

This is continuing bad news for Trump. He is guilty for sure.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Flagpole wrote:

Papadopolous told an Australian diplomat in May 2016 that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton. One of the several reasons that the FBI opened an investigation...was not based on the Steele Dossier.

This is continuing bad news for Trump. He is guilty for sure.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Mueller is coming.

Hillary is done.

Trump continues on.

Old Ohio man gets the runs.

I think you're too intelligent and ethical for these Trump turds. Obama lied 18 times in 8 years, and he sure as s**t did not get a pass from his race. All the GOp did was obstruct for 8 years. Hillary, you guys sound like scorned lovers, she must haunt your innermost fantasies or something. Guess you want to be tied up and tongue-lashed by Hillary Clinton or something. Whatever floats your boat. Fact is Hillary faced 9 GOP congressional investigations and they did not find anything of note. She is clean.

All of these are red herrings. Since 1968 there have been Republicans in the presidency for 28 years and Democrats for 20 years. 209 Republicans have been indicted on criminal charges and 4 Democrats have been indicted on criminal charges.

Republicans are unethical shysters who smoke Putin's pole.

Shah in exile? wrote:

its_baddude wrote:

Islamophobia rampant in Iran right now.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/30/irans-protests-are-powerful-and-real-why-are-mainstream-media-outlets-so-hesitant-to-report-on-them.html

If Iran wants to be ruled again by a Shah, their exiled Crown Prince (Reza Pahlavi) is willing to do it. Plus, he would make Iran an ally for the US. It won't happen but who knows....

The mainstream media has been reporting it. It's the top story on CNN and the BBC right now. Fox's line is horsesh*t.

its_baddude wrote:

I can accept your statement that some *not all* analysis showed premium would be higher without ACA. However, this is not how you represented your statement. Obama said that ACA would lower premiums and *it did not*. You know that, I know that, everyone knows that. The original poster claim that statement was a lie? Was that a lie? Do you hold Obama to the same standards you hold Trump to?

My statement is that *all* analysis shows that premiums would be higher without the ACA. If you can find me a single reputable analysis that shows different I'd like to see it.

Obama never said that the ACA would lower premiums, in real terms, for every American. Unlike Trump, Obama was able to explain about how the healthcare system works and the effect that the ACA would have. The times Obama sat down and explained things in detail, it was clear that he believed the ACA would only, "bend the cost curve".

Analysis thus far says Obama was right.

Even if Obama turns out to be wrong in the long term, it just means he was wrong, not a liar.

And yes, I hold everyone to the same standard when it comes to lying.

On January 20, 2017, as President Donald Trump began his inaugural address, a cold rain began to fall.

A few hours later, Trump claimed the rain had not begun to fall.

“The crowd was unbelievable today,” Trump crowed to revelers at the Liberty Inaugural Ball. “I looked at the rain, which just never came. You know, we finished the speech, went inside, and it poured!”

It wasn’t a consequential falsehood. And neither was Trump’s claim that his inaugural crowd was the largest ever, a whopper he sent his press secretary out to defend the next day in the face of overwhelming photographic evidence. Neither the meteorological conditions at his swearing-in nor the size of the audience that witnessed his swearing-in altered the remarkable fact that he had just been sworn in as the president of the United States. So why would the holder of the most powerful office on earth insist on juicing his narrative with petty embellishments, especially when his propaganda could be so easily and objectively disproved?

In retrospect, it’s obvious that Trump was starting to construct an alternative reality for his supporters, establishing himself (rather than the “enemies of the people” in the “FAKE NEWS” media) as the only reliable source of truth. Really, it was pretty obvious at the time. Trump aide Kellyanne Conway was already spinning that the administration was helpfully supplying the media with “alternative facts.”

I wrote back in the Week One edition of the Did-It-Matter-Meter that the crowd-size episode “laid down a marker about the irrelevance of facts to this White House” and “staked out new territory in Orwellian up-is-down-ism, forcing Americans to choose whether to believe Trump or their lying eyes.” A year later, Trump is still spinning an alternative reality in which he’s achieved more than any other first-year president, he doesn’t watch much TV, the Russia investigation is nothing but a partisan witch hunt, the successive defeats of both candidates he endorsed in a Senate race in Alabama actually demonstrated his immense popularity, the coal industry is coming back, Americans are finally free to say “Merry Christmas” without fear of persecution, and legislation that would slash taxes for the rich in general and real estate developers in particular would somehow hurt his bottom line. No matter how often the fact-checkers fact-check him, he sticks with his alternative facts.

I don't want to debate the merits of the ACA right now. Many analysis were done and predictions were made. The predictions were wrong. This is why the ACA has to be fixed. If everything was so great this would not be a debate. I'm more interested in the standard you use to judge Democrats vs Republicans. At lease, I would like to point out your strong bias and to consider there is a possibility that you are wrong. I ask you one more time, watch these videos and tell me if Obama lied. Tell me if you hold him to the same standard as Trump. I don't accept your premise that Obama was able to explain how the healthcare cost better than any common person on the street. Your premiums will decrease by $2500 per year for a familyhttps://youtu.be/_o65vMUk5so Premiums will decrease by as much as 3000% for your employers for your health insurance. They could give you a raise.https://youtu.be/lUd-slJc-GY

And this is one of many reasons why flagpole, LL, Conundrum, Fat Hurts, etc...are biased and subjective to the nth degree. This has been pointed out pages ago. Flagpole calls it old news, Obama didn't lie, he was a great president, which is total baloney.

My deductible went up $1,000's, yes $1,000! I challenged anyone of them to provide their email address, bet me (it's call compensation), and I'll gladly email them back and prove 100% that they are wrong. But if Trump did the same thing, then Flagpole would be whining like a school girl.

Your post is one of many reasons that they have no creditability, zero.

When premiums go up, your deductible should go down. Didn't happen that way with Obama, not even close.

Now, watch them come back with nothing, it happens every single time (except for LL, I'd give him a head nod). Flagpole, who promised he'd stop posting, will continue with his lies, misrepresentations, and bias view for his side. If Clinton had won, can you imagine what would have happened to premiums and deductibles?

Mueller isn't getting Donald J. Trump, period. Put your money where your words are. You simply post to read your own posts over and over as it gets you excited, even though little flagpole boy knows he's wrong.

Great post its_baddude

NOT ONE LIBERAL FOOL ON THIS SITE IS GOING TO AGREE WITH YOU FRIEND, SO DON'T WASTE ANYMORE OF YOUR PRECIOUS TIME AS LIFE TRULY IS SHORT. THEY ARE FOOLS WHO SIMPLY CAN'T HANDLE DEFEAT VERY WELL.

It's really quite simple. Biased babies.

Upset because not one of them believed Trump had a chance. They were so confident that when half the election night was over, they started crapping their pants when some of them realized, "oh sh*t, he might win". Gagpole cried.

Bias/Sour Grapes/Sore Losers/Spoiled Brats/2nd grade mentality/Mama's Boys/Won't get free healthcare/Wanted a woman to win (see Mama's Boy)/Loved Bill Clinton/Wanted Obama for a 3rd term because of his race/----feel free to keep adding on to my list.

They lost.

Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:

Hate 2 Say It But wrote:

Congratulations! Yours is a now a last minute entry for the annual LRC Stupidest Post of the Year Award!

Well done, sir. Well done indeed!

I'm talking legally, as they have the Kingly power of pardon to excuse themselves from law violations.

No, they really don't.

Let's see Trump try that trick and watch what happens. Hint: It would not be pretty for Trump.

sssyyyhhhr wrote:

NOT ONE LIBERAL FOOL ON THIS SITE IS GOING TO AGREE WITH YOU FRIEND, SO DON'T WASTE ANYMORE OF YOUR PRECIOUS TIME AS LIFE TRULY IS SHORT. THEY ARE FOOLS WHO SIMPLY CAN'T HANDLE DEFEAT VERY WELL.

Wow, your clever use of all capital letters makes your post quite convincing. I mean, who can refute a post made in all capital letters?

This is why the MSM is not trusted. NYT giving Hillary State Department a rundown of the stories they are running in advance. Can any liberal with IQ around 100 explain this?

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/947301750603767808/photo/1

I am not Flagpole. Are you people nuts? You think everyone is flagpole.

Although I will take that as a compliment.

I would have more respect for you if you admitted some of the times trump lied. These include the big and little times. If you admitted that yes he lied about releasing his taxes. Yes he often acts immature and self cenetered. Yes the Russians helped Trump. But I can't respect a group of trump fanatics who can admit none of this. You accept Trump's alternate reality without questioning any of it. Many of us just can't respect your complicity.

tunnelratNnam wrote:

It's really quite simple. Biased babies.

Upset because not one of them believed Trump had a chance. They were so confident that when half the election night was over, they started crapping their pants when some of them realized, "oh sh*t, he might win". Gagpole cried.

Bias/Sour Grapes/Sore Losers/Spoiled Brats/2nd grade mentality/Mama's Boys/Won't get free healthcare/Wanted a woman to win (see Mama's Boy)/Loved Bill Clinton/Wanted Obama for a 3rd term because of his race/----feel free to keep adding on to my list.

They lost.

its_baddude wrote:

This is why the MSM is not trusted. NYT giving Hillary State Department a rundown of the stories they are running in advance. Can any liberal with IQ around 100 explain this?

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/947301750603767808/photo/1

Journalists often run stories by the individuals involved including government departments for many reasons. Examples include giving them a right to reply and making sure they aren't committing libel, breaking official secrets acts or completely getting their facts wrong.

Wikileaks itself does this.

One day you'll understand how the world works but you're not quite there yet. Happy new year.