He's better than 0-3 because he made a lot of people look silly during Obama's elections. He's only recently given that money back to the house.
He's better than 0-3 because he made a lot of people look silly during Obama's elections. He's only recently given that money back to the house.
I dislike the damage being caused by Trump but Mueller won't rush it. There is a crapload of evidence and the RNC-GOP is dirty across the board. This will come to light in early fall just in time to foul up their 2018 election cycle aspirations. There is a huge blue wave coming and it will be extremely spectacular. Also, Trump and his band of criminals are going down hard. Good things take time.
VJ FTW wrote:
Trump and his supporters are not attacking Mueller. You're living in your Lib bubble. You need to come out and realize how dumb you sound.
ZERO indictments related to anything from 2015-November 8, 2016.
ZERO evidence of collusion.
ZERO evidence of obstruction.
ZERO chance of Donald Trump being removed from office.
"...it's a nothingburger...", Van Jones, early 2016. Smart dude.
Sorry. Get ready for 2020, little crybabies.
One more time. Cochran is absent from the Senate due to illness. So he is technically not in the hospital. He is recovering at home. Not sure why you picked this comment as a lie. Do you really think that Trump lied or misspoke? Does Trump "lie" change the meaning of the conversation?
http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2017/oct/16/gop-sen-thad-cochran-grappling-illness/The GOP veteran, 79, has been absent from Washington for a month.
"The Senator has expressed his intention to return to the Senate when his health permits, and to fulfill his commitment and duties to the people of his state."
Jeff Wigand wrote:
http://www.businessinsider.com/thad-cochran-not-in-hospital-trump-2017-9its_baddude wrote:
You claim he is dishonest. Please prove he is dishonest. You are making stuff up.
Conundrum wrote:
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
The NY Times White House reporters are so fvcking pathetic. When Trump tells you he knows the details of the tax legislation better than the world's greatest CPA, you ask a goddamn follow-up question like, "so what's the relationship between full expensing and the interest deduction limitation?" or "what do you think of the provisions they've built in to prevent inappropriate income shifting?" You don't just... move on. There are only two possible explanations for this kind of journalistic malpractice. Either Trump's idiocy is contagious, or the "liberal" media isn't really all that liberal.
That was a very good point. And this is something that I have said a long time now, our media lets trump and Huckabee sanders get away with outrageous statements. Why? Journalism no longer attracts our best and brightest people. I don't see the probing thoughtful questions of the journalists of old. The news has become a joke and seems to just report headlines and then some YouTube video.
It gives rise to Trump like characters.
I think there are still great journalists out there, they just aren't allowed anywhere near where they might embarrass the Republicans in power and ruin their paper's precious "access", which is good for clickbait-driven ratings and nothing else. It boggles my mind that anyone bothers to send their reporters to the White House press conferences at all. But they all do, and eagerly.
It's definitely how you get Trump. The Times' total lack of substantial policy coverage and extensive Clinton EMAILZ!! reporting was as much to blame for his election as any other single factor.
Nothing better than watching Hillary lovers continue to have meltdowns!!!!!
How’s that Russian collusion working out for you?
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!
VJ FTW wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Trump and his supporters are very worried about what Flynn is saying to Mueller and what Mueller is finding. This is why they are attacking Mueller and the FBI and the Department of Justice. If he weren't guilty of anything, he would NOT be doing this.
Trump and his supporters are not attacking Mueller. You're living in your Lib bubble. You need to come out and realize how dumb you sound.
ZERO indictments related to anything from 2015-November 8, 2016.
ZERO evidence of collusion.
ZERO evidence of obstruction.
ZERO chance of Donald Trump being removed from office.
"...it's a nothingburger...", Van Jones, early 2016. Smart dude.
Sorry. Get ready for 2020, little crybabies.
1) Trump and his supporters are absolutely attacking Mueller. You don't pay attention if you don't think that is true. Judge Pirro says he should be taken out in handcuffs along with others from the FBI and the Justice Department. Hannity attacks him as does most of Fox News, and now we have several Republicans doing it too from Matt Gaetz, Ron DeSantis, and Francis Rooney from FL to Jim Jordan, Devin Nunes, and the list goes on. All questioning Mueller and his team saying that they are all just out to get Trump. A bunch of BS. Newt Gingrich initially praised Bob Mueller as a great choice and straight shooter, but now he says Mueller is corrupt. What has changed? Oh...the fact that Mueller is actually showing he means business by the admissions of guilt and the indictments he has gotten already. The circle is closing in on Trump, and they all know it, so they are trying to seed the thoughts of bias. All BS.
2) Your list of zeros is silly. Zero indictments during that time period...yep...for now. Just shows what kind of people Trump surrounded himself with, so it is telling. Zero evidence of collusion? Well, no, there is evidence of collusion. We just don't know yet if there is enough for charges. I say there will be and that there is stuff we don't know yet. Zero evidence of obstruction? Again, we actually have a LOT of evidence of obstruction. Trump's firing of Comey is enough right there, and that is what triggered the special counsel. Enough to bring charges? We shall see. Zero chance of Trump being removed from office? Get to know probability. The betting houses would disagree with you there.
3) Van Jones no longer has a nothingburger attitude toward Trump.
4) It is hilarious that you Trumpers continue to say there is "zero evidence" of this or that. The investigation is still going on. For anyone who has been under a federal investigation, it is typical that you don't know if there is evidence of anything until they announce it. You are hopeful for some reason. Why you would want to defend Donald Trump is beyond me. Even if he was just the liar that he is with no other bad qualities (and he has a ton), that should be enough for you not to want to defend him. His latest lie is that he has signed more "legislation" than any other president. This is A) not true. He is actually the least active in that way of any president all the way back to Truman, and B) not something to brag about anyway. Republicans are supposed to like FEWER legislative moves, so saying you had a ton isn't necessarily good anyway. So, he lies about things that don't mean anything to anyone, but he's not lying about Russia? BS. You support the biggest liar ever to be elected to any office anywhere.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done. How will the clown be done? I believe he will be removed from office or resign before the end of his first term as a result of what is found in the Mueller investigation. IF the investigation goes on longer than to the 2020 election, I believe he will not be re-elected. And then, once he is out of office, he will be charged with serious crimes including obstruction of justice, perjury, money laundering, and conspiracy.
He really is a bad, bad person. Just look at the things we know for sure about him:
1) Trump University was found to be fraudulent and he had to pay $25 million to victims.
2) He was charged with discrimination in a housing issue in New York.
3) He admitted that he grabs women "by the p*ssy" without their consent.
4) He admitted on air that he walks backstage unannounced at his pageants so he can see the women naked because he's the owner and he "gets away with that". What a freakin' creep.
5) He said he wouldn't have time to play golf. He's the leader by far in golfing for US Presidents.
6) He said there were "some very fine people" on both sides of the issue in Charlottesville.
7) The lies -- There is no way I can list them all, but here are some good ones (in addition to the golf one I mentioned earlier) -- Mexico will pay for the wall; I will release my taxes when the audit is complete; I will sue the accusers; I know more about ISIS than the generals do; The tax bill will cost me a lot, believe me.
Anyone who still thinks he is good for America is a fool.
Mueller is coming.
Mr. "Two Corinthians" is done.
Flagpole wrote:
Van Jones no longer has a nothingburger attitude toward Trump.
Van Jones has two attitudes - his TV attitude and his real one. His TV attitude is whatever is best for CNN's ratings.
Fortunately we got a glimpse of his real attitude.
Nothing burger.
its_baddude wrote:
One more time. Cochran is absent from the Senate due to illness. So he is technically not in the hospital. He is recovering at home. Not sure why you picked this comment as a lie. Do you really think that Trump lied or misspoke? Does Trump "lie" change the meaning of the conversation?
1) When you start asking if an untrue statement by someone affected anything, you are just defending them and not addressing the issue that what that person (Trump in this case) often says is untrue. You should not accept someone you support lying so much.
2) Trump IS a liar...that is indisputable. BUT, he also tells falsehoods. One definition of a falsehood is a "lie", but there is a difference between the two. A lie is when you knowingly do not tell the truth about something. A falsehood is when you say something that is untrue but you perhaps didn't know it was untrue. For example, when Trump said his was the biggest electoral college victory since Reagan, that was a falsehood. He actually had heard that somewhere and believed it to be true, but it wasn't true. When he said that the Russia story was a hoax, that was a lie. When he says he is worth $10 billion, that is a lie. When he says his properties have filed for bankruptcy only 4 times, that is a lie (it is 6 times).
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
scoreboard czech wrote:
He's better than 0-3 because he made a lot of people look silly during Obama's elections. He's only recently given that money back to the house.
Hi Flagpole:)
No, you didn't make anyone look silly during the Obama Election. That was White Guilt and pure reverse racism. Too much for you to process, but wait a year and it'll come to you. Remember Van Jones saying Trump winning was White Backlash? Total BS, but...if the left says it, well it's gotta be right;)
Flagpole wrote:
its_baddude wrote:
One more time. Cochran is absent from the Senate due to illness. So he is technically not in the hospital. He is recovering at home. Not sure why you picked this comment as a lie. Do you really think that Trump lied or misspoke? Does Trump "lie" change the meaning of the conversation?
1) When you start asking if an untrue statement by someone affected anything, you are just defending them and not addressing the issue that what that person (Trump in this case) often says is untrue. You should not accept someone you support lying so much.
2) Trump IS a liar...that is indisputable. BUT, he also tells falsehoods. One definition of a falsehood is a "lie", but there is a difference between the two. A lie is when you knowingly do not tell the truth about something. A falsehood is when you say something that is untrue but you perhaps didn't know it was untrue. For example, when Trump said his was the biggest electoral college victory since Reagan, that was a falsehood. He actually had heard that somewhere and believed it to be true, but it wasn't true. When he said that the Russia story was a hoax, that was a lie. When he says he is worth $10 billion, that is a lie. When he says his properties have filed for bankruptcy only 4 times, that is a lie (it is 6 times).
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Yep, like the lies that Clinton and Obama told, but you ignored as simple politics. You not worth more than 2 sentences as your intellect and bias are the pits.
Flagpole wrote:
VJ FTW wrote:
Trump and his supporters are not attacking Mueller. You're living in your Lib bubble. You need to come out and realize how dumb you sound.
ZERO indictments related to anything from 2015-November 8, 2016.
ZERO evidence of collusion.
ZERO evidence of obstruction.
ZERO chance of Donald Trump being removed from office.
"...it's a nothingburger...", Van Jones, early 2016. Smart dude.
Sorry. Get ready for 2020, little crybabies.
1) Trump and his supporters are absolutely attacking Mueller. You don't pay attention if you don't think that is true. Judge Pirro says he should be taken out in handcuffs along with others from the FBI and the Justice Department. Hannity attacks him as does most of Fox News, and now we have several Republicans doing it too from Matt Gaetz, Ron DeSantis, and Francis Rooney from FL to Jim Jordan, Devin Nunes, and the list goes on. All questioning Mueller and his team saying that they are all just out to get Trump. A bunch of BS. Newt Gingrich initially praised Bob Mueller as a great choice and straight shooter, but now he says Mueller is corrupt. What has changed? Oh...the fact that Mueller is actually showing he means business by the admissions of guilt and the indictments he has gotten already. The circle is closing in on Trump, and they all know it, so they are trying to seed the thoughts of bias. All BS.
2) Your list of zeros is silly. Zero indictments during that time period...yep...for now. Just shows what kind of people Trump surrounded himself with, so it is telling. Zero evidence of collusion? Well, no, there is evidence of collusion. We just don't know yet if there is enough for charges. I say there will be and that there is stuff we don't know yet. Zero evidence of obstruction? Again, we actually have a LOT of evidence of obstruction. Trump's firing of Comey is enough right there, and that is what triggered the special counsel. Enough to bring charges? We shall see. Zero chance of Trump being removed from office? Get to know probability. The betting houses would disagree with you there.
3) Van Jones no longer has a nothingburger attitude toward Trump.
4) It is hilarious that you Trumpers continue to say there is "zero evidence" of this or that. The investigation is still going on. For anyone who has been under a federal investigation, it is typical that you don't know if there is evidence of anything until they announce it. You are hopeful for some reason. Why you would want to defend Donald Trump is beyond me. Even if he was just the liar that he is with no other bad qualities (and he has a ton), that should be enough for you not to want to defend him. His latest lie is that he has signed more "legislation" than any other president. This is A) not true. He is actually the least active in that way of any president all the way back to Truman, and B) not something to brag about anyway. Republicans are supposed to like FEWER legislative moves, so saying you had a ton isn't necessarily good anyway. So, he lies about things that don't mean anything to anyone, but he's not lying about Russia? BS. You support the biggest liar ever to be elected to any office anywhere.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done. How will the clown be done? I believe he will be removed from office or resign before the end of his first term as a result of what is found in the Mueller investigation. IF the investigation goes on longer than to the 2020 election, I believe he will not be re-elected. And then, once he is out of office, he will be charged with serious crimes including obstruction of justice, perjury, money laundering, and conspiracy.
He really is a bad, bad person. Just look at the things we know for sure about him:
1) Trump University was found to be fraudulent and he had to pay $25 million to victims.
2) He was charged with discrimination in a housing issue in New York.
3) He admitted that he grabs women "by the p*ssy" without their consent.
4) He admitted on air that he walks backstage unannounced at his pageants so he can see the women naked because he's the owner and he "gets away with that". What a freakin' creep.
5) He said he wouldn't have time to play golf. He's the leader by far in golfing for US Presidents.
6) He said there were "some very fine people" on both sides of the issue in Charlottesville.
7) The lies -- There is no way I can list them all, but here are some good ones (in addition to the golf one I mentioned earlier) -- Mexico will pay for the wall; I will release my taxes when the audit is complete; I will sue the accusers; I know more about ISIS than the generals do; The tax bill will cost me a lot, believe me.
Anyone who still thinks he is good for America is a fool.
Mueller is coming.
Mr. "Two Corinthians" is done.
All fake news combined with things that are your own silly opinion because you lost flaggy.
Mueller is coming alright, after HRC and her corrupt pals.
You're so out of touch it's unreal.
Flagpole wrote:
Well........ wrote:
This past weekend there was one relative who was an outspoken trump fan. I swear she was the only one in a group of about 12 people. She did worship trump. Everyone thought she was a loser. All she talked about was the stock market. Ironically she doesn't have that much money and out of all of us, she is the least likely to have money in themarket.
The Trump supporters are a strange breed.
This is not surprising. LOTS of people who don't have money in the stock market will talk about how great it is when it is doing well, believing that that is indicative of the economy as a whole. They will especially do this when their person is in office. What is also beyond ridiculous is that the market has been on a tear since March 2009. I made more money, both in total and as a percentage growth during Obama's presidency than in any other. Doing well so far in Trump's presidency too, but we'll see if we get 8 years of steady growth there or not (he won't be around for 8 years though). Of course, the President has very little effect on the market over time.
Those who continue to support Trump are definitely a strange breed. Their intelligence must be called into question. There were legitimate reasons (though I maintain still that it was rationalization for bad behavior) for supporting him as a candidate, but we have now seen after almost a year that he is chaos personified, he is hardly working at all (at the golf course at RECORD pace after saying he wouldn't have time to play golf), and he is rightfully under investigation due to his behavior after being elected (which will prove his bad behavior before being elected). Beyond that, the lies are incredible. He lies about absolutely everything, so why should anyone believe him when he says there was no collusion with Russia?
We are most likely entering or already in the tail end of this equities rally, which is already one of the longest running. The "Trump trade" is done now and valuations are insanely high, with a massive gap to actual growth. WHEN it tumbles, which should be a sizable correction, Trump fans will have one less thing to celebrate. It should be Trump's worst fear that this happens before his second term, but I believe he would feel a bigly sense of relief if he had a good excuse not to run/win.
Btw - most frequent golf playing POTUS of all time already and just 1 year in... expect him to do much more of nothing in the coming years.
Apparently the only response for you Trumpers is to repeat the same lies that have long since been discredited. I guess you work for LR because you want more site hits.
You have no defense against Flagpole who unequivocally cucked you.
Mueller is coming and Trump is done.
2 Sentence Story wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) When you start asking if an untrue statement by someone affected anything, you are just defending them and not addressing the issue that what that person (Trump in this case) often says is untrue. You should not accept someone you support lying so much.
2) Trump IS a liar...that is indisputable. BUT, he also tells falsehoods. One definition of a falsehood is a "lie", but there is a difference between the two. A lie is when you knowingly do not tell the truth about something. A falsehood is when you say something that is untrue but you perhaps didn't know it was untrue. For example, when Trump said his was the biggest electoral college victory since Reagan, that was a falsehood. He actually had heard that somewhere and believed it to be true, but it wasn't true. When he said that the Russia story was a hoax, that was a lie. When he says he is worth $10 billion, that is a lie. When he says his properties have filed for bankruptcy only 4 times, that is a lie (it is 6 times).
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Yep, like the lies that Clinton and Obama told, but you ignored as simple politics. You not worth more than 2 sentences as your intellect and bias are the pits.
I admit I thought it was just trolling at first, but never have I seen so much obsession over people who are no longer relevant. I remember Bush being water under the bridge almost immediately after he left office. Trump is 1 year in, and yet the names Hillary, Bill and Obama constantly reappear on this thread. Aren't Trump supporters supposed to have endless achievements to boast about? Funny how no one is celebrating the..
- great border wall
- deporting all illegal immigrants
- draining of the swamp (which was in his "contract with the people")
- Muslim ban
- getting rid of ACA
- ditching NATO
- labeling China as a currency manipulator
- approving waterboarding/torture
- prosecuting HRC
- rebuilding infrastructure
I have heard flagpole and others state, if Hillary broke any laws, go after her and arrest her. I have never heard Trump supporters say anything like that about trump. One more thing, the trump supporters keep conflating not arrested yet with no evidence of collusion. Instead of no evidence of collusion (which is wrong anyway) you should be saying, trump hasn't been arrested. There is a huge difference between the two and only one is correct.
2 Sentence Story wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) When you start asking if an untrue statement by someone affected anything, you are just defending them and not addressing the issue that what that person (Trump in this case) often says is untrue. You should not accept someone you support lying so much.
2) Trump IS a liar...that is indisputable. BUT, he also tells falsehoods. One definition of a falsehood is a "lie", but there is a difference between the two. A lie is when you knowingly do not tell the truth about something. A falsehood is when you say something that is untrue but you perhaps didn't know it was untrue. For example, when Trump said his was the biggest electoral college victory since Reagan, that was a falsehood. He actually had heard that somewhere and believed it to be true, but it wasn't true. When he said that the Russia story was a hoax, that was a lie. When he says he is worth $10 billion, that is a lie. When he says his properties have filed for bankruptcy only 4 times, that is a lie (it is 6 times).
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Yep, like the lies that Clinton and Obama told, but you ignored as simple politics. You not worth more than 2 sentences as your intellect and bias are the pits.
Trollminator wrote:
2 Sentence Story wrote:
Yep, like the lies that Clinton and Obama told, but you ignored as simple politics. You not worth more than 2 sentences as your intellect and bias are the pits.
I admit I thought it was just trolling at first, but never have I seen so much obsession over people who are no longer relevant. I remember Bush being water under the bridge almost immediately after he left office. Trump is 1 year in, and yet the names Hillary, Bill and Obama constantly reappear on this thread. Aren't Trump supporters supposed to have endless achievements to boast about? Funny how no one is celebrating the..
- great border wall
- deporting all illegal immigrants
- draining of the swamp (which was in his "contract with the people")
- Muslim ban
- getting rid of ACA
- ditching NATO
- labeling China as a currency manipulator
- approving waterboarding/torture
- prosecuting HRC
- rebuilding infrastructure
Wow, you didn't bit&h when Hillary was against illegal immigration or building the Wall. Or when Obama banned certain travel from the same countries that Trump did.
Muslim ban? Do you even have a clue as to who the REALLY bad people are and what they are trying to do to infiltrate our country? Funny, when Hillary was for it in 2005/2006, where were you Mr. Pudlicker?
The Wall that she supported, is that the Wall (Fence=same thing) that you are talking about?
NATO? Do you even understand NATO? What a bean brain you are.
Oh, now I see. That was okay for her, but not for him, because she=you lost!!!!!
I love that it bothers you that much, I really do Mr. Pudlicker.
Conundrum wrote:
I have heard flagpole and others state, if Hillary broke any laws, go after her and arrest her. I have never heard Trump supporters say anything like that about trump.
One more thing, the trump supporters keep conflating not arrested yet with no evidence of collusion. Instead of no evidence of collusion (which is wrong anyway) you should be saying, trump hasn't been arrested.
There is a huge difference between the two and only one is correct.
2 Sentence Story wrote:
Yep, like the lies that Clinton and Obama told, but you ignored as simple politics. You not worth more than 2 sentences as your intellect and bias are the pits.
Ever hear of B.G.? Do the lives lost there matter to you? They matter to me, a lot!!!
She wasn't arrested, but are you dumb enough to believe she was "not guilty". You can't have it both ways and call it old news.
The same rules that you apply to Trump have to apply to her as it wasn't 10 years ago, it was recent, very recent in political years.
Flagpole never talks about those lives and the lies that she told, ever. He doesn't care as they weren't related to him. I don't care if every person that died was far left, they didn't deserve what happened to them, period. Flagboy never brings it up. Embarrassed of Hillary's lies and cover-up?
She blamed it on a YOUTUBE video, which is utterly preposterous on too many levels to count.
That's where Flagboy pulled out the "blame it on Russian Ads crap"--- that didn't influence anyone.
I have Facebook and never saw one ad that he speaks of and I don't have any political affiliations on my page, not one.
I fear a constitutional crisis. Mueller will close in on Trump and trump will have himfired. What will t he Republican Congress do?
So you bank on them being ethical? If trump fired mueller, what would the trump supporters on letsrun say?............Trump had to fire Mueller because he was so biased?.
It's gonna get ugly.
Nicklebacker wrote:
Honestly Fat Hurts, you guys are making it so easy on us. Can you think "before" you hit submit post? Hillary lost and she was as corrupt as they come. You're proud of who "YOU" were wanting to win? Go back on the sidelines fatty boy.
Honestly Niclebacker, I couldn't care less about Hillary.
I'm still waiting to find some Trump supporter who will bluntly say that he is an honest man. Still no takers.