Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

same story different day wrote:

No he's posting actual facts that no one is refuting, instead they say he was wrong about the election. That's the reality you're missing. That's winning.

Ohhh, so, I see the confusion now. You don't understand what facts are.

OK, well here's some facts for you:

1) Not a single piece of evidence has come out that there was any colluuuuuussssssion between Trump and the Russians.

2) Not a single indictment has been issued as a result of something occurring between 2015 and November 8, 2016.

3) A crapload of evidence that the DNC and HRC DID IN FACT rig the primary against Bernie Sanders HAS been exposed.

4) A crapload of evidence that the DNC and HRC DID IN FACT collude with RUSSIAN OFFICIALS HAS been exposed.

5) Evidence that the FBI and Obama Admin used this artificial information as rationale wiretap Trump campaign officials has been exposed.

These are the only facts that matter. That is not winning.

same story different day wrote:

No he's posting actual facts that no one is refuting, instead they say he was wrong about the election. That's the reality you're missing. That's winning.

Yep. The election is old news. Had Trump not fired Comey, I wouldn't be on here as frequently as I am, because there then wouldn't have been a special counsel created to look into possible obstruction of justice...which then has led to a closer look at possible collusion (conspiracy) and financial crimes.

This has nothing to do with being upset about the election results.

And, as I have said many times now, I CURRENTLY stand as incorrect about who would win that election, but if collusion (conspiracy) is proven, I will be proven right...can't win with cheating.

Trump and Kushner and Trump Jr. among others are facing:

Perjury (Trump not yet because he hasn't said anything under oath, but if he does talk under oath, he will perjure himself)

Obstruction of justice

Money laundering

Conspiracy against the United States

Trump and his supporters are very worried about what Flynn is saying to Mueller and what Mueller is finding. This is why they are attacking Mueller and the FBI and the Department of Justice. If he weren't guilty of anything, he would NOT be doing this.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

The Gallant Pig Man wrote:

The NY Times White House reporters are so fvcking pathetic. When Trump tells you he knows the details of the tax legislation better than the world's greatest CPA, you ask a goddamn follow-up question like, "so what's the relationship between full expensing and the interest deduction limitation?" or "what do you think of the provisions they've built in to prevent inappropriate income shifting?" You don't just... move on. There are only two possible explanations for this kind of journalistic malpractice. Either Trump's idiocy is contagious, or the "liberal" media isn't really all that liberal.

That was a very good point. And this is something that I have said a long time now, our media lets trump and Huckabee sanders get away with outrageous statements. Why? Journalism no longer attracts our best and brightest people. I don't see the probing thoughtful questions of the journalists of old. The news has become a joke and seems to just report headlines and then some YouTube video.

It gives rise to Trump like characters.

No, it was a biased point by a biased party.

You mean like the free pass that Obama repeatedly got up until just over a year ago for fear of being called a racist? Oh yeah, that's different. Obama was never pressed and got a free ride for 8 years based on race. The journalist during his period were spineless turds. But that was just over a year ago, so let's not talk about how he got away with it for 8 years, lets talk about the last 11 months. Liberals are the phoniest clowns around. One year ago is ancient news according to you clowns, but his free pass press conferences for 8 years were fine with you. Honestly, you guys are pathetic liars and you talk about Trump?

same style same lack of intelligence wrote:

Told a dozen posters? More like told one or two posters using different unregistered handles, haha.

Flagpole is owning everyone.

Says the guy who changes his handle on every post! You're embarrassing.

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

I'll not check LRC for a couple weeks and then pop back in,

So that post was made 12/29/2017 10:55AM

Then you posted again 12/29/2017 11:03AM

And that doesn't count when you may post under other unresigstered or registered names.

I will say that I have only used this handle on this thread.

And I did take about a week off over the last week.

Response?

Oh wait, you aren't checking back here for a while.

Flagpole wrote:

Trump and his supporters are very worried about what Flynn is saying to Mueller and what Mueller is finding. This is why they are attacking Mueller and the FBI and the Department of Justice. If he weren't guilty of anything, he would NOT be doing this.

Trump and his supporters are not attacking Mueller. You're living in your Lib bubble. You need to come out and realize how dumb you sound.

ZERO indictments related to anything from 2015-November 8, 2016.

ZERO evidence of collusion.

ZERO evidence of obstruction.

ZERO chance of Donald Trump being removed from office.

"...it's a nothingburger...", Van Jones, early 2016. Smart dude.

Sorry. Get ready for 2020, little crybabies.

You've told several people that you don't bet because you are a loser, which we all already knew. You've been wrong so many times that I can't believe you still show your face up around here. You blame an election on ads, ads???, because you are so easily influenced, you believe others to be. You lost, you were wrong and you've got to live with it fat man. Your excuses are moronic.

When you want to back your "guarantees" up with some denaro, speak up ole' man as I'll be the first one to take your bet.

You're what, 0-3 on your predictions and always whine afterwards. Hillary was dangerous to our country as she was only it in for herself and lied to get the nomination (even Bernie said that).

Hillary Clinton and the Podesta brothers are in trouble, big trouble, and they know it even though you obviously don't.

Wait for it.

Trump will not be impeached and he'll be President for the full term, which you disagree with, but won't back it up.

Translation: You're a weasel.

Methinks you lads doth protest too much, all you guys have a secret fetish for rubbing it out to Hillary.

However you should know that Flagpole rules you in every way. He is smarter, better looking, more talented, faster, has bigger biceps, is more accomplished, is better educated, is winning every argument, has better adjusted and smarter children, is happily married, makes bank, and he even satisfies his woman in ways you can never satisfy a woman. You should accept that he is vastly superior to any one of you Trump supporters.. He honors you by throwing pearls (his wisdom) before swine (you).

And for your information, buckle up buttercups, it's going to be a long year ending with a sour taste for Trump fans. It is blatantly obvious that Robert Mueller is being very thorough and delaying as many big bombs on the Trump until summer so this investigation can hurt as many complicit Republican congressmen running for reelection in 2018 as possible.

Timing is everything and Trump is toast.

Also, Flagpole dominates you repetitious Cult .45 nutters.

Try to refute some of his points, because you clearly have a tenuous grasp on what a fact is.

BTW, how much do you charge him to rent out room in your head? I mean you think about him so much your handle has his name in it and you want him to blow his brains out. He couldn't be more in your consciousness.

L L wrote:

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

I'll not check LRC for a couple weeks and then pop back in,

So that post was made 12/29/2017 10:55AM

Then you posted again 12/29/2017 11:03AM

And that doesn't count when you may post under other unresigstered or registered names.

I will say that I have only used this handle on this thread.

And I did take about a week off over the last week.

Response?

Oh wait, you aren't checking back here for a while.

BS. You are surely one of the more honest guys on this thread and you do use tact (versus FP), no doubt about it, but you live here LL and you know it. And no, I'm NOT EPIC Flagpole.

L L wrote:

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

I'll not check LRC for a couple weeks and then pop back in,

So that post was made 12/29/2017 10:55AM

Then you posted again 12/29/2017 11:03AM

And that doesn't count when you may post under other unresigstered or registered names.

I will say that I have only used this handle on this thread.

And I did take about a week off over the last week.

Response?

Oh wait, you aren't checking back here for a while.

I think you just proved why you guys are having such difficulty trying to defeat Trump (a man that certainly is loose with his words and implications at all times). In your attempt to make a point against a poster who basically said they "pop in" once in a while, you take it to the extreme, implying that he must then only post a single time each two week time frame. That is not what he said or what he implied. Yet you focused just on that. Why?

its_baddude wrote:

You claim he is dishonest. Please prove he is dishonest. You are making stuff up.

We are claiming that even his supporters do not go around saying that Trump is an honest man. That tells you all you need to know.

its_baddude wrote:

You claim he is dishonest. Please prove he is dishonest. You are making stuff up.

Fat hurts wrote:

its_baddude wrote:

You claim he is dishonest. Please prove he is dishonest. You are making stuff up.

We are claiming that even his supporters do not go around saying that Trump is an honest man. That tells you all you need to know.

You mean like Clinton's sheep who were going around just over a year ago not saying that Hillary was an honest woman. That tells you all you need to know.

Honestly Fat Hurts, you guys are making it so easy on us. Can you think "before" you hit submit post? Hillary lost and she was as corrupt as they come. You're proud of who "YOU" were wanting to win? Go back on the sidelines fatty boy.

Jeff Wigand wrote:

its_baddude wrote:

You claim he is dishonest. Please prove he is dishonest. You are making stuff up.

http://www.businessinsider.com/thad-cochran-not-in-hospital-trump-2017-9

^Here ya go Wigand^

What? I am sure you can come up with a better example than that. That is a better example of media dishonesty making a story out of nothing.

Above referring to the story about the Senator recovering from surgery