We don't need a million thread on this topic. We like one thread per topic. We merged several others into this thread including one called "Alex Pretti was a deranged lunatic." and one called "New York Times reports that Pretti attacked ICE cars 11 days before his death" and one called "LeBron James: Why hasn't he commented on the Alex Pretti killing?"
-
30
-
Pretti was a deranged lunatic. Good ridddance communist scum.44
-
seare wrote:
Weirdos wrote:
So you do understand what a poll is and how they work. With this particular poll the vast majority according to this one agree with the removal of illegal immigrants. Glad to clear the air and see that you’re finally understanding. You seemed very confused there for a while.
It’s very clear that you don’t understand what you’re talking about. You think that it’s some revelation that polls don’t get responses from 100% of the country. What was the timing and methodology of this poll?
What are you even talking about? If you’re saying the poll is flawed then expound. So far you’ve only argued that 65% isn’t a majority.
13 -
watcher of genocides wrote:
Pretti was a deranged lunatic. Good ridddance communist scum.Silly, why didn’t you kill him last week when he was actually doing something? You proud boys are so stupid.
34 -
Weirdos wrote:
seare wrote:
It’s very clear that you don’t understand what you’re talking about. You think that it’s some revelation that polls don’t get responses from 100% of the country. What was the timing and methodology of this poll?
What are you even talking about? If you’re saying the poll is flawed then expound. So far you’ve only argued that 65% isn’t a majority.
I’ve never argued that 65% isn’t a majority. You’re further proving your own confusion.
41 -
Harambe wrote:
Weirdos wrote:
I could certainly say that if there was an example of it. I don’t deal in hypotheticals usually though.
Pretti was unarmed and shot in the back. Pretty straightforward
Any other relevant information so we aren’t dealing in hypotheticals. That seems very vague for making such a serious determination.
33 -
72
-
watcher of genocides wrote:
Pretti was a deranged lunatic. Good ridddance communist scum.Ueah, aame vid posted a few minutes earlier. Speaking of performative leftists, how about the obviously staged spray attack on Illin Homar… apple cider vinegar!
13 -
LOL you trust a media outlet called "the BBC"? Is that a news agency or a porn channel?
77 -
What's your point? He was disarmed then shot by agents of the federal government. Thats the story.
98 -
Weirdos wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Pretti was unarmed and shot in the back. Pretty straightforward
Any other relevant information so we aren’t dealing in hypotheticals. That seems very vague for making such a serious determination.
Pretti was a felon once he didn’t announce he was carrying to the Feds. I’m pretty sure his phone was going to act as a detonating device but was very confusing with all the lunatic Dems blowing whistles non stop so had to make a judgement call in the heat of the moment..my life or his and he’s in an urn now.
Win for the good guys
24 -
Or this one?
33 -
Alex Pretti spits at ICE agents and smashes federal SUV's tail light in video 11 days before death
A crazy Dim male nurse. Figures
This post was edited 54 seconds after it was posted.52 -
Pretty restrained response to masked nazis invading his neighborhood, really.
135 -
You’re trolling right? Because if you’re not then you should go get help for your derangement and maggot filled brain
33 -
What percentage of ICE agents do you think are far-right militia/gang members or have criminal histories? 75%?
74 -
seare wrote:
Weirdos wrote:
What are you even talking about? If you’re saying the poll is flawed then expound. So far you’ve only argued that 65% isn’t a majority.
I’ve never argued that 65% isn’t a majority. You’re further proving your own confusion.
My apologies. I was confused and must be wrong. I thought you were the poster who responded with specific numbers regarding the initial conversation surrounding that balanced article and poll. Someone said less than 260 people polled agreed. My mistake.
14 -
Harambe wrote:
Weirdos wrote:
Any other relevant information so we aren’t dealing in hypotheticals. That seems very vague for making such a serious determination.
Do you disagree?
I 100% agree that if then the abstract a government agent walked up to someone and just shot them in the back it would be wrong.
I've answered your hypothetical. Now might there be any other possible relevant information that could make it less straight forward?
12 -
Couldn't pass the mcat plus being snickered at by doctors left him very frustrated.
36
