Use ya head, bro wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
They didn’t refute the claims because they have morals. There is no hard evidence. There is none. You have the victim and a coroborator or two.
Alan
I've never seen so many MEN... with testosterone boiling in their bodies (maybe not?)... acting like such BlTCHES nowadays to protect their SJW tribe.
Trump "admitted to sexual assault". PLEASE. If you listen to that Access Hollywood private discussion between he and Billy Bush, and don't realize they're messing around with macho banter, you're a dishonest man. Grow a pair. Yes, men are pervs. Yes, they "think about sex every 15 seconds" (scientific studies). Yes, they even have ultra perverted discussions amongst themselves when they can.
Do you realize in the 80s and 90s how many women were throwing themselves at Trump?!
Did Trump ever try to rape someone? Absolutely not. Without ANY evidence at all, and without any admittance of wrongdoing, it's just two stories against each other.
And again, it's the timing of the allegations in and of itself that discredits the allegations and makes them appear to be all politically motivated BS. The AH tape and the follow-up allegations from random women was a political plan to destroy POTUS45. It WASN'T ENOUGH TO DEFEAT HIM.
...And so some cry.
Being a pervert is not the same as forcing yourself on someone.
Someone disagrees with you so you start throwing insults?
I’m pretty sure I meet the “Real Man” criteria set forth by Letsrun.
Between the Howard Stern interview and the Billy Bush tape it’s not a far stretch to go from inappropriate comments to harassment or assault.
I don’t believe all 18 accusations are true....but at least one has to have merit.
What’s your opinion on Franken or Weinstein or Lauer? There is as much “proof” for those allegations as there are for Trumps. Same as Cosby’s. It’s all he said/she said. There’s actually more proof for Moore’s than anyone else’s.....
Alan