Rigged for Rupp wrote:
Politifact is well-known, welk regarded, and has something called a Pulitzer prize winning publication. You caterwauling about "it's bulls**t" doesn't make it so. You're raging away on this thread every Friday night. Don't you have friends or family? Sad.
Says the guy who's posting on here every Friday night. Do you any friends or family? Pity.
Wow, its_baddude has been mega-triggered.
Go lie down for a while, little buddy. It will all be over soon enough.
My second post in months here. All you need to do is skim through the thread and see what I say is true. Too much of a dolt to figure that out? Sad.
Buzzlightyear wrote:
Says the guy who's posting on here every Friday night. Do you any friends or family? Pity.
Proud Democrat wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Your criticisms of Hillary and the Democratic Party are valid, and I agree with them. Doesn't mean though that all the fake advertising the Russians did to prop up Trump and rip Hillary didn't have an effect, and it was FAR more than a "couple fake news stories posted on Facebook"...more than 10 million people in swing states saw those fake ads, and that's just Facebook. Trump news outlets (Fox, Breitbart, etc., INCLUDING THE BIGGEST AM RADIO STATION IN CENTRAL OHIO and for sure others) then spread that stuff on the airwaves. After it was debunked as a fake news story, 610 AM radio in Columbus, OH broadcast that Obama set it up so that his girls' grandmother would get $160,000 a year for life from tax payers. Callers then called in and said stuff like, "that's Obama and Democrats for you!" Was a bunch of crap. That's just one that I personally heard happen (and I contacted the station to rip them for it). For sure it happened more on that station and on tons of others across the country. Morning drive DJs don't check sources.
We can't really get into the effectiveness of those ads though...if it was determined that Trump colluded (conspired) with the Russians, then that is cheating and undermining our election process and is anti-American.
The Democrats definitely need some new blood and a clear vision...but, in times of turmoil, you always need to focus on the bear in the kitchen. In our case it's an orange one. He is so crooked that we have never seen anything remotely close.
You can be a Democrat who wants to see a clear vision for the party and ALSO recognize that Trump is a clear and present danger. You should have strong opinions on both.
Trump is done.
Do you support the Bernie wing of the Party? From my point of view we are way more divided than the republicans at the moment.
I agree with a lot of what Bernie says. The biggest thing I disagree with him on is that college should be free. We have too many people attempting college right now as it is, and not everyone is cut out for college. There are already very feasible ways to pay for college.
I agree again with you that the Democratic Party is more divided than the GOP is. That's unfortunate but more so because the GOP is currently siding with Trump who has a very warped sense of nationalism to go along with clear racism and many other isms.
It is clear that Putin has leverage over Trump. Trump is a fraud. Many Republicans including posters here believe that Trump is a big successful businessman (well, he is big). This is ridiculous...banks in America will no longer loan to him because he has stiffed them too many times. He then gets a loan from Deutsche Bank and he stiffs them and then they loan him more money...the same bank that in Moscow was fined in 10 billion in Russian money laundering case.
Mueller now interviewed Hope Hicks, and while she's no big fish, she is as close to him as any person on the planet. FBI warned her about Russian contacts, and there is NO WAY she didn't discuss that with Trump. That would mean that he has been lying constantly about not knowing about any Russian contacts with anyone on his staff...of course he knew.
Trump is evil.
Trump is done.
Clinton Failed
Bush Failed
Obama attacked and Failed
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/939006911629869056
Trump_wins wrote:
Clinton Failed
Bush Failed
Obama attacked and Failed
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/939006911629869056
1 minute Video from Trumps Twitter Feed showing clinton, bush and obama failing
its_baddude wrote:
So you liberals claim to deal in facts. I'm still waiting.
"You have very fine people...on both sides" - Donald J. Trump
You are taking this out of context. He did not say the violent racist are fine people. He said there were non racist protesting among the racist.
To see if you are smart, explain this.
"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans,"
what difference – at this point, what difference does it make?" - Hillary explaining the Benghazi attack
Called black kids superpredators
“We need to take these people on, they are often connected to big drug cartels, they are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called superpredators. No conscience. No empathy."
If you want, we can a real discussion.
He is racist against Mexicans, black people, Muslims, and I'm sure anyone who isn't white, and probably even many of those. From ripping on a judge from Indiana who has Mexican ancestry to wanting a "Muslim ban" and on and on and on. Obama wasn't born in the US, a view he still supposedly holds. If he isn't racist, then racism isn't a thing...dude, he's clearly racist.
Prove it. You saying so it not proof.
You are defending a clear racist, and I have neither the time nor the interest in explaining to someone who believes he isn't racist. I've already given you two examples. I could list them all day long and you will deny. Dude, if you support a racist, you are also one. Find a mirror.
its_baddude wrote:
Al Franken got railroaded and bullied by the Democratic leadership. He should not resign if he is innocent. I don't care if he is a liberal.
Another example of party over country.
Franken admitted to some of it. Can't be grabbing women without their consent and stay in the Senate. He should have stepped down as he is not innocent.
Rigged for Rupp wrote:
My second post in months here. All you need to do is skim through the thread and see what I say is true. Too much of a dolt to figure that out? Sad.
Buzzlightyear wrote:
Says the guy who's posting on here every Friday night. Do you any friends or family? Pity.
Yeah, you're a real bright dolt yourself there little guy. Every hear of changing handles. Oh, that's right, you're a dolt and can't figure out the easy stuff. Get a life loser, you're here every Friday wimpy, you already confirmed that. Does it matter if you're reading or posting? No, it doesn't but confirms that you don't have a life.
I'm addicted, sorry homebread.
Flagpole wrote:
its_baddude wrote:
So you liberals claim to deal in facts. I'm still waiting.
You are taking this out of context. He did not say the violent racist are fine people. He said there were non racist protesting among the racist.
To see if you are smart, explain this.
"Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night and decided they’d go kill some Americans,"
what difference – at this point, what difference does it make?" - Hillary explaining the Benghazi attack
Called black kids superpredators
“We need to take these people on, they are often connected to big drug cartels, they are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called superpredators. No conscience. No empathy."
If you want, we can a real discussion.
Prove it. You saying so it not proof.
You are defending a clear racist, and I have neither the time nor the interest in explaining to someone who believes he isn't racist. I've already given you two examples. I could list them all day long and you will deny. Dude, if you support a racist, you are also one. Find a mirror.
I was a Republican all along and was just seeing the other side of the coin. It's called being objective.
Like you supported and defended Hillary Clinton, a clear racist. Build a wall and voted for illegal immigration, her words. You aren't even close to being sharp on politics except for the suckers who are even dumber. You should always know both sides and be prepared to accept and admit facts or your own side (and the other) will lose confidence in anything you say. In your case, it's a lost cause. You just repeat and rinse, repeat and rinse, repeat and rinse. A broken record. Look at your posts. You repeat everything in hopes that it will suddenly become truth.
Trump won and is here for the term, he's going nowhere.
Democratic indictments are already in order. Good luck to your gal as she's put in the slammer.
Fake
Rigged for Trump wrote:Good luck to your gal as she's put in the slammer.
Using Trump logic that was so long ago as to not matter at all. Her roles were insignificant according to Trump logic.
50 years from now, will insist Hillary's ghost is running the Deep State, or something.
You puppets need new material from the Briedbard fascism generator.
Rigged for Trump wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
You are defending a clear racist, and I have neither the time nor the interest in explaining to someone who believes he isn't racist. I've already given you two examples. I could list them all day long and you will deny. Dude, if you support a racist, you are also one. Find a mirror.
I was a Republican all along and was just seeing the other side of the coin. It's called being objective.
Like you supported and defended Hillary Clinton, a clear racist. Build a wall and voted for illegal immigration, her words. You aren't even close to being sharp on politics except for the suckers who are even dumber. You should always know both sides and be prepared to accept and admit facts or your own side (and the other) will lose confidence in anything you say. In your case, it's a lost cause. You just repeat and rinse, repeat and rinse, repeat and rinse. A broken record. Look at your posts. You repeat everything in hopes that it will suddenly become truth.
Trump won and is here for the term, he's going nowhere.
Democratic indictments are already in order. Good luck to your gal as she's put in the slammer.
Get your handle changing straight.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Rigged for Trump wrote:Good luck to your gal as she's put in the slammer.
50 years from now, will insist Hillary's ghost is running the Deep State, or something.
You puppets need new material from the Briedbard fascism generator.
When you're a vampire, I suppose it's possible.
Oh, and...
https://steemit-production-imageproxy-thumbnail.s3.amazonaws.com/U5ds6v7TsM3EjtRfpyrbRsvzmgf5Q61_1680x8400Piedpiper99 wrote:
People post proving how much Hillary lied with facts, but you call it fake news and say it wasn't criminal.
You wanted her as president, so you ignore the massive amount of lies that your top candidate accumulated as a Senator, Candidate and First Lady claiming nobody proved anything, implying that even if she lied, she wasn't convicted...so then it's okay to lie.
I think you're having a hard time understanding the nature of proof (linking to breitbart or youtube conspiracy videos isn't proof) and distinguishing between criminal lies, political white lies and compulsive lies.
All politicians lie.
Clinton and Trump's political lies and empty promises don't mean squat.
Trump's compulsive lying also doesn't amount to much in the scheme if things but it is weirding most people out and creating diplomatic problems.
Obviously what matters is whether they've told any criminal lies, obstruction of justice etc. and whether it can be proved in a court of law (and no, breitbart and youtube won't hold up)
Another posters lists all Flagpole's false guarantees, Flagpole doesn't like it.
Unfortunately he's not intelligent enough to realize that actual indictments are coming soon and hard against many top politicians on the Left, and they already know it, but he's still talking about Trump.
As Flagpole has said repeatedly if indictments are coming for democrats then good. They can all hang. The difference seems to be that republicans see lawbreaking as a left-right thing. At this point you could prove me wrong by saying that you believe in the rule of law and if Trump or Moore turn out to be guilty you would accept it. Doesn't mean you have to change your political viewpoint.
Do you believe in the rule of law? Cause that's really all that's at stake here. [hint] You can't answer 'no' and expect anyone to respect your opinion. Don't bother deflecting either.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Rigged for Trump wrote:Good luck to your gal as she's put in the slammer.
Using Trump logic that was so long ago as to not matter at all. Her roles were insignificant according to Trump logic.
50 years from now, will insist Hillary's ghost is running the Deep State, or something.
You puppets need new material from the Briedbard fascism generator.
Your short but incessant babbling doesn't help your case in the least. HR Clinton will be indicted soon. Honestly, if you were even half intelligent on the subject, we could all have a decent conversation, but your ignorance stamps out any chance of that happening. Don't worry, you'll still get some of your "free" programs to keep you going day to day.
baitedclicker wrote:
Piedpiper99 wrote:
People post proving how much Hillary lied with facts, but you call it fake news and say it wasn't criminal.
You wanted her as president, so you ignore the massive amount of lies that your top candidate accumulated as a Senator, Candidate and First Lady claiming nobody proved anything, implying that even if she lied, she wasn't convicted...so then it's okay to lie.
I think you're having a hard time understanding the nature of proof (linking to breitbart or youtube conspiracy videos isn't proof) and distinguishing between criminal lies, political white lies and compulsive lies.
All politicians lie.
Clinton and Trump's political lies and empty promises don't mean squat.
Trump's compulsive lying also doesn't amount to much in the scheme if things but it is weirding most people out and creating diplomatic problems.
Obviously what matters is whether they've told any criminal lies, obstruction of justice etc. and whether it can be proved in a court of law (and no, breitbart and youtube won't hold up)
Another posters lists all Flagpole's false guarantees, Flagpole doesn't like it.
Unfortunately he's not intelligent enough to realize that actual indictments are coming soon and hard against many top politicians on the Left, and they already know it, but he's still talking about Trump.
As Flagpole has said repeatedly if indictments are coming for democrats then good. They can all hang. The difference seems to be that republicans see lawbreaking as a left-right thing. At this point you could prove me wrong by saying that you believe in the rule of law and if Trump or Moore turn out to be guilty you would accept it. Doesn't mean you have to change your political viewpoint.
Do you believe in the rule of law? Cause that's really all that's at stake here. [hint] You can't answer 'no' and expect anyone to respect your opinion. Don't bother deflecting either.
Interesting post and question. However some on the right will answer yes they do believe in the rule of law but then resort to a severe form of denial to avoid applying the rule of law when their man violates the rule. How do you think all the Moore voters in Alabama would answer that question?
I like your breakdown of different types of lies. However, Trump's incessant lies over even small things is very relevant. It reflects a total disregard for honesty and reality. It's hard to get a country to follow your leadership when you lack any credibility. (Although this may be a good thing)
Hillary Smells wrote:
Liberals are foolish and spineless. They hate the United States. They smell like Hillary’s constant wet farts. They are limp and stupid.
I never see liberal posts at this diminished level of quality. This type of post supporting the conservative agenda is not rare.
Can some intelligent conservative poster explain why these really dumb posts just come from the right?