ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
Loop me in wrote:You are kidding - this is a haven of narcissists. Yes, it has identified a few proper con-artists and some good stuff has been done, but most threads break down into pages upon pages of "ha ha, he/she didn't know that the letsrun sleuths were on the case" rhetoric.
I am not against Letsrun, but it has to pick it's targets otherwise it looks like it is dominated by petty whiners.
So you have set yourself up as the arbiter of what constitutes lying, cheating and fraud worth outing?
Sorry you are entitled to an opinion and we are entitled to ignore your whataboutery. You come up with a fatuous idea where someone doing a Marathon and claiming to be 2 minutes faster than they were is somehow equivalent to pretending to have run 26.2 miles every day for a year.
I think it is called a "debate" - each side puts their case forward.
Yes, i see little difference. After all, cheating is cheating right?
I find it laughable that LRC pretends to act on a moral high ground, claiming to defend charities or the honour of running or whatever when really it does this because it is fun. And i believe this case proves it - no damage has been done, a charity got some money and yet the LRC need to exercise it's bloodlust.
Just be honest.