Steve Magness Issues Passionate Rebuttal To Alberto Salazar’s Open Letter

Steve,

What did you see? All you came up with was a picture of a chart. Please show us more proof. Please show us something so we take what you're saying serous.

You can write emotional responses all day long, but we still need something to know you're telling the truth. Alberto did a great job dismissing your accusations. Now give us a real response with some kind of proof.

TrackCoach wrote:

Btw, Houston is a large school, in a large state, it is fully funded D1; why hasn't Magness been able to produce an NCAA qualifier in any event?

Ah, if only it was that easy, make me "fully funded D1" and I'll automatically do the rest. And you use the handle TrackCoach, you've really outdone yourself in the stupidity stakes this time.

Ballyhoo, chaps! Our Freud-hired barristers have the situation well in hand. There is no need to ask for help from these "Americans".

The Champ wrote:

I'd also like to hear Magness' explanation of this.

follow up questions wrote:

Rojo please ask Steve Magness about the following. Did Magness lie or did Epstein mischaracterize what Magness said?

Should I feel guilty about taking undue pleasure in watching someone this bone-chillingly stupid ramble on with such undiluted confidence? It's quite the combination, very Palin-esque. Or should I just enjoy the show?Mrr82 calls to mind a guy who would take nothing but boxes of Ex-Lax with him on a long survival hike in the wilderness, then mock his detractors for forgetting how much energy chocolate has in it.I cannot think of a more stark example of the Dunning-Kruger effect than this post.

Are we talking about the same Magness who published a book full of spelling mistakes and typos?

Salazar may not be the most likable character, but it seems an awful lot of people would like to pin their own shortcomings in his back, with a kitchen knife.

The case against Lance Armstrong was nothing but accusations for 10 years. It took the power of the subpoena to get to truth on that. I fall on the where there's smoke there's fire side on this one with NOP.

Pretty sure everything in that post was true.

Your post comes across as someone who sits in their moms basement and has no future. You added no value, no substance, just a non-sensical rambling trying to put someone else down using piss poor logic...or should i say no logic at all.

phantom wrote:

The case against Lance Armstrong was nothing but accusations for 10 years. It took the power of the subpoena to get to truth on that. I fall on the where there's smoke there's fire side on this one with NOP.

Yes, remember the Alamo, I mean Lance Armstrong. When all else fails just toss out a rhetorical bomb. Waiting for comparisons to Nazis and calling people hitler.

Dumb assalert.. wrote:

Your post comes across as someone who sits in their moms basement and has no future. You added no value, no substance, just a non-sensical rambling trying to put someone else down using piss poor logic...or should i say no logic at all.

The Freud drones are starting to crack. Their desperation is obvious.

phantom wrote:

The case against Lance Armstrong was nothing but accusations for 10 years. It took the power of the subpoena to get to truth on that. I fall on the where there's smoke there's fire side on this one with NOP.

So, this one day, in he first grade, when you were sick, they taught us two things.

1. This situation is not always that situation.

2. Apples are differnet from Oranges.

I'm sorry you are sick, and hope you get better soon.

Dumbasalert.. wrote:

Pretty sure everything in that post was true.

Your post comes across as someone who sits in their moms basement and has no future. You added no value, no substance, just a non-sensical rambling trying to put someone else down using piss poor logic...or should i say no logic at all.

Please point out ONE THING in Mrr82's post that was not pure speculation.

He said is that he's POSITIVE that no way no how would Rupp and Salazar have been that careless.

Then he said Magness better watch it because he is going to embarrass himself.

Mrr82 does not fit into the world of track and field fandom. He needs to stick with NASCAR, pro wrestling, or bass fishing.

Apparently, you, like a depressing number of others on this board, are also stupid beyond measure. It'll be a relief when all of you disappear after Salazar finally goes down.

first graderr wrote:

So, this one day, in he first grade, when you were sick..

You obviously missed that entire grade.

Brojos, exactly how "passionate" is Steve Magnesses' response

cool kid wrote:

Brojos, exactly how "passionate" is Steve Magnesses' response

More passionate than you are about literacy.

It (the title of the headline) may have been inaccurate. Perhaps Magness was not "passionate" afterall...perhaps it was merely a "panick attack".

NOP fanbois before Alberto's letter: "It was testoboost testoboost testoboost testoboost testoboost. Alberto has the documents and will prove it. End of story!"

NOP fanbois after Alberto's letter: "I demand Magness come clean about which emails he read and when that one time he carried Galen's piss test to the Mayo clinic to make sure Galen was clear to run in Dusseldorf in relation to a single peripheral use of prednisone without a TUE!"

Slivery Slope wrote:

It (the title of the headline) may have been inaccurate. Perhaps Magness was not "passionate" afterall...perhaps it was merely a "panick attack".

Poor Slivery. Did the boys not invent you to the pub after work? Being alone on a Friday night is such a sad affair for a Brit like you. Your life must be a lonely one.

bump

bkrunner wrote:

follow up questions wrote:

Rojo please ask Steve Magness about the following. Did Magness lie or did Epstein mischaracterize what Magness said?

+1 for this. I would love for the brojos to use their relationship with Magness to actually get us some info.There are parts of the Magness/Salazar back-and-forth that don't add up to me, and I definitely think we need more info if we're going to be convinced either way. So how about it, Rojo?

It seems the Freud foot-soldiers are at a lose. They don't what to do at this point. They resort to hoping others will do their dirty-work for them. The Frued people don't have expertise to the required research for this type of activity: saving old-man Salazar.

follow up questions wrote:

bump

bkrunner wrote:

+1 for this. I would love for the brojos to use their relationship with Magness to actually get us some info.There are parts of the Magness/Salazar back-and-forth that don't add up to me, and I definitely think we need more info if we're going to be convinced either way. So how about it, Rojo?