doubtful. from looking at the list the majority of the 5k guys are doing the 10k. not saying they will be tired, since it will be tactical, but there are guys in the 5k who can ball out. i don't think its that easy to say
doubtful. from looking at the list the majority of the 5k guys are doing the 10k. not saying they will be tired, since it will be tactical, but there are guys in the 5k who can ball out. i don't think its that easy to say
$File/ecac10men.htm
1500 talk isn't over yet. Yochum edges Guarino at ECACs; 4 autos in that race and now 6 guys under 3:50 for the year. Damn. Quite the New England contingent in that event, adding Corsello and Kamm to a list that already included Cohen and Cole.
Does anyone know how that race played out?
Also, who will be doubling out of that New England contingent? It seems like a number of folks could do the 1500+800 or 1500+5k if they so choose, although it does really come at the detriment of both events.
At this rate they should just hold the 1500m in Massachusetts.
Hrmm wrote:
Does anyone know how that race played out?
62 63 61 42/43 Last 400 in 57.X
I would like to thank Alex Eaton for finally running to his potential in the 400. My bet has been on him for 400m champion. Nice race for him at Allegheny!
women's 5k is looking damn good this year
ryan o connor ran a 14:27 5k this past weekend... he should be up there
All I got to say is watch out for women distance runners Jenny Scherer, from St. Noberts, & Megan O'Grady, from Carroll University
look at the girls in the 1640s lawton ran it alone
there was a girl 10s behind i wouldn't call that all alone. wendy pavlus knows how to win championship races. lawton will make it a fast race like in indoor but shes not head and shoulders above everyone to win that way. i call pavlus or freshman phenom rawles.
come on, who is not in this? all are good runners who can go fast. Seniors have more experience.
Liz Lawton Jr University of Chicago 16:41.16
Jen Rawls Fr Rowan University 16:41.75
Alicia Freese Sr Pomona-Pitzer 16:42.65
Stephanie Perleburg Sr Wisconsin La Crosse 16:43.38
Nice little last chance in Oneonta, NY tomorrow, has some suprisingly fast talent in it.
10k- New England 1-8
1500- New England 1-8
5k- New England 1-8
The east coast comes and shows the country how to run like men, and the the rest of the boys go home crying. Party on the east coast!!!!
I predict somebody will make fun of DIII on these boards for being slow. In turn the DIII guys will get bent out of shape and start posting arguments citing Nick Symmonds, Andrew Rock, etc. and how, even though their times would not be competitive w/ the top DI runners, there is still plenty of talent running respectable times, they work just as hard, blah, blah, blah.
Eh, DIII people know that they are slow comparatively, they just don't like it being rubbed in their faces. I don't think that DIII athletes work as hard as the better DI athletes unless they're at the very top end. I also don't think that anyone in DIII, even the very best athletes, fool themselves into thinking otherwise.
I think the top end of D3 (meaning almost anyone on the most serious programs and some of the better athletes at the less establish programs) generally works just as hard as your average D1, though the top end of D1 really takes running to another level and treats it as their job, something few if any D3 athletes do. There are a lot of D1 scrubs that are running to get the scholarship and don't take it that seriously though. Clearly D1 and D2 are faster, but the fact that D3 exists motivates a lot of guys that would be mediocre runners without a ton of motivation to improve and take the sport seriously at the D1 level to really excel and run at the top tier of D3.
Word.
not to get sidetracked but... wrote:
I think the top end of D3 (meaning almost anyone on the most serious programs and some of the better athletes at the less establish programs) generally works just as hard as your average D1, though the top end of D1 really takes running to another level and treats it as their job, something few if any D3 athletes do. There are a lot of D1 scrubs that are running to get the scholarship and don't take it that seriously though. Clearly D1 and D2 are faster, but the fact that D3 exists motivates a lot of guys that would be mediocre runners without a ton of motivation to improve and take the sport seriously at the D1 level to really excel and run at the top tier of D3.
Based on yesterday's meets, these are projected cut-offs for making nationals.
800-1:51.81 (this assumes that Kehoe is injured and doesn't run, otherwise 1:51.79)
1500-3:51.98 (assuming Flynn drops and everyone else runs it, although Kamm or Najem might also drop)
Steeple-9:12.22
5000-14:37.75-this is probably set since it's doubtful anyone else will qualify today.
10000-30:37.95-again, probably set.
Good luck to anyone chasing marks on the last day of qualifying!
The min. field sizes are at least 15, and thanks to doubles, That # often expands to about 16 or 17...so the cutoffs should be further back (contingent upon what happens tonight)
nevermind, just realized not all the times from last night are posted on raceberry