Biological male is suing Princeton University and Leone Timing as they wouldn't let 'her' run in women's division at track meet

Book is called River - by Roderick Thorp

Thorp also wrote the book which the movie Die Hard was based upon.

This MAGA bro despises women so much that he would not allow them to speak for themselves. No, he must be the one who decides what those young women really think because he is the GREAT NADA.

He is the ultimate patriarchal misogynist.

And he believes he knows better than trans youths, their parents and their doctors combined about what's best for trans people.

What psychiatric expertise does he have, and how many trans people has be diagnosed?

He must have also thought he knew more about infectious disease than all the people at CDC and NIH.

FIFY

Yeah. They are exhibitionist oddball gay males who really are in need of help. They are so jealous of, and angry at, actual women that they are driven to attack women. And they do this “legally” by jumping into womens sports. To them it’s apparently almost as satisfying as physically beating up a woman.

All this talk of handing them hormones and giving them gender denying surgery is ridiculous.

Look at pics of this guy who’s suing Princeton. Anyone who would leave him alone with a small child is insane.

Who are "they"? People who keep their social media account private and refuse any media interview requests because they don't want to talk about their trans identity? How can they possibly be "exhibitionists"?

The problem with people like you is that you think "trans people" are all one and the same. Do you think all cis hetero males are like Jeffrey Epstein? That's your ultimate cis hetero privilege. You don't have to worry about being judged by another member of your group. You should be grateful about your privilege every single day.

A track meet does not have a duty of care to provide psychiatric treatment, that is gender affirming care, for people with gender dysphoria. Just like we don’t kill all the spiders because some people have arachnophobia. In fact a good psychiatrist would recommend trans people avoiding events that have enforced biological sex-based divisions, like competitive sports. Also, Nikki Hiltz proves you can compete in your correct biological sex category without it impacting your gender identity.

You’re exactly what was in the post, hiding behind a complicit media and dishonest “academics” in order to spread your propaganda and hate, especially your hatred of real women. That’s your privilege, always able to deny reality and responsibility.

Do better. lolololololol

Dude, don’t bother arguing with these lunatics. All you’ll get is page after page of amateur hour pilpul from freaks who endlessly repeat the same propaganda. The freak you engaged is the same goofball who was obviously lusting after AB Hernandez in the thread discussing his victories over girls at the CA State HS meet. Most people realize what exhibitionistic pervs these guys are. They thrive on the flagellation. Ignore them.

I hope Schreiner's case does not get quickly dismissed and thrown out of court.

Schreiner is suing under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, aka LAD.

NJ's LAD is a cobbled-together amalgaman of all the different NJ state laws and successive amendments to those laws that the New Jersey legislature has passed, and NJ governors have signed into law, since 1945 pertaining to discrimination of all types and in different contexts. Such as discrimination based on race/ethnicity, sex, age, creed, place of national origin, nationality, disability and so on in places of public accommodation, employment, public contracts and services, housing, education, medical care, mortgage banking, credit, real estate transactions

As it stands now, the NJ LAD contains a number of unclear passages and blatantly contradictory provisions that need to be carefully examined, clarified and ironed out.

The NJ LAD also provides certain civil rights protections and entitlements based on some key terms that are ill-defined in this NJ law; defined by this NJ law in a rather peculiar way that many people would find inaccurate or downright objectionable; or simply not defined at all.

The most glaring problems New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination that Schreiner's case points up and will bring attendtion are the contradictions between LAD's longstanding provisions based on sex that allow for sex separation in certain contexts in ways that benefit female people, and the more recent provisions based on "gender identity and gender expression" that effectively do away with all the prior provisions based on sex that have benefitted girls and women because they permitted us to have sports and certain spaces and services solely for females based on our unique biology and needs.

Under amendments added to the state statutes in 1970, New Jersey made discrimination against people based on their sex illegal in a wide array of contexts. But at the same time, the language added to NJ law in 1970 clearly allowed for there to be separation of the sexes for specific purposes where separating by sex is reasonable:

"nothing herein contained shall be construed to bar any place of public accommodation which is in its nature reasonably restricted exclusively to individuals of one sex, and which shall include but not be limited to any summer camp, day camp or resort camp, bathhouse, dressing room, swimming pool, gymnasium, comfort station, dispensary, clinic or hospital, or school or educational institution which is restricted exclusively to individuals of one sex, from refusing, withholding from or denying to any individual of the opposite sex any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges thereof provided on the basis of sex"

However, when LAD was amended in 2006 to add "gender identity and gender expression" to the list of "protected characteristics" under NJ anti-discrimination law, new language was added which says that people must now be allowed admission to single-sex spaces and programs based on their "gender identity and expression" rather than their sex.

11. It shall be an unlawful employment practice, or, as the case may be, an unlawful discrimination

f. (I) For any owner, lessee, proprietor, manager, superintendent, agent, or employee of any place of public accommodation directly or indirectly to refuse, withhold from or deny to any person any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges thereof, or to discriminate against any person in the furnishing thereof, or directly or indirectly to publish, circulate, issue, display, post or mail any written or printed communication, notice, or advertisement to the effect that any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, or privileges of any such place will be refused, withheld from, or denied to any person on account of the race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, marital status, domestic partnership status, sex, gender identity or expression, affectional or sexual orientation, disability or nationality of such person, or that the patronage or custom thereat of any person of any particular race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, marital status, domestic partnership status, sex, gender identity or expression, affectional or sexual orientation, disability or nationality is unwelcome, objectionable or not acceptable, desired or solicited, and the production of any such written or printed communication, notice or advertisement, purporting to relate to any such place and to be made by any owner, lessee, proprietor, superintendent or manager thereof, shall be presumptive evidence in any action that the same was authorized by such person;

provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be construed to bar any place of public accommodation which is in its nature reasonably restricted exclusively to individuals of one sex , which shall include but not be limited to any summer camp, day camp, or resort camp, bathhouse, dressing room, swimming pool, gymnasium, comfort station, dispensary, clinic or hospital, or school or educational institution which is restricted exclusively to individuals of one sex

and provided that any owner, lessee, proprietor, manager, superintendent, agent, or employee of any place of public accommodation shall not be prohibited

from refusing, withholding from or denying to any individual of the opposite sex any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities or privileges thereof on the basis of sex

provided individuals shall be admitted based on their gender identity or expression

instead of their sex.

Since 2006, Jersey's Law Against Discrimination has said that for the purpose of this law,

"Gender identity or expression" means having or being perceived as having a gender related identity or expression whether or not stereotypically associated with a person's assigned sex at birth."

But nowhere in New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination in its past iterations or its present form is any definition given for the meaning of the word "sex."

So I want to see Schreiner's lawsuit get hashed out in court by competent lawyers and heard by some judges with keen legal minds to clarify if New Jersey law still permits separation of the sexes in certain situations where in my eyes that seems not only reasonable, but beneficial and even vital, especially for those of us who are female.

Such as girls' and women's sports teams and competitions from which all males across the board would be barred because of their sex - regardless of what claims some fellas make about their "gender identity" and what choices some make in terms of their "gender expression."

In countries like the USA, Canada and the UK, the vast majority of blokes in the current era who've adopted a trans gender identity are not gay/homosexual males - meaning males sexually attracted solely to other males.

The vast majority of so-called "transwomen" in the USA are males sexually attracted to females solely or primarily who have a male paraphilia known as autogynephilia. Meaning they are sexually aroused by the thought and image of themselves as girls/women.

Many of these guys not only demand that the world see them as women, but they want to be regarded as lesbians - particularly by women (the female kind) who are genuine lesbians. Bedding a bona fide lesbian is the holy grail for many of these dudes. Hence the noxious term "the cotton ceiling."

The term “cotton ceiling” was invented by a male trans activist and porn performer in 2012 to describe the obstacles and hardships men who identify as “trans lesbians” say they face in being accepted as “real lesbians” and getting real lesbians to have sex with them.

The term “cotton ceiling” is copied from the term “glass ceiling," which means the invisible barrier that prevents women from reaching the pinnacles of power in the worlds of business, tech and politics.

Whereas the "glass ceiling" refers to a set of unseen obstacles that keep women down, the "cotton ceiling" refers to the fabric of the underwear lesbians wear that trans-identified males say symbolizes what they believe are the unfair discrimination, unreasonable obstacles, bigotry, transphobia and and "penis-exclusionary genital preferences" that keep them from getting into the pants and beds of actual lesbians.

Nowadays, there are also plenty of men and teenage boys who in previous centuries would have been bog-standard homosexual, heterosexual or bisexual blokes but due to the easy availabily and enormous influence of internet porn and the popularity of transgenderism in recent years, their natural inclinations and responses to erotic stimuli have been altered and they've become autogynephilic males attracted to other autogynephilc males. Meaning they're attracted to men who outwardly appear feminine in very pornified, glamourpuss way but who still have their male tackle, male libido, and male sexual proclivities.

Hilarious! I am for Title IX, for girls/women's only sports, for girls/women's rights to safety and privacy. While you are for boys/men in girls/women's sports, boys/men in women's restrooms and locker rooms. Your patriarchal men's rights movement seeks to erase women. It's very clear who is the misogynist.

Your support for physical mutilation and lifelong hormone and drug addiction of minors is sick. Minors and many parents have been lied to. Many detransitioners are now coming forward telling how they were lied to and how their lives have been wrecked. Your ignorance is breathtaking.

You never posted a single word on Title IX when it does not involve any trans athlete. You have absolutely NADA interest in women.

You mean, a half dozens of them who are repeating the same story over and over in all places?

They all have a few things in common. None of them ever expressed gender dysphoria in early childhood. They never saw any medical professional until they hit puberty. They were all rushed into medical transition without enough psychiatric evaluation.

Name ONE detransitioner who expressed gender dysphoria in early childhood and had consistent gender identity into the onset of puberty. Where are those people is there are any?

Your desire to sexualize kids in early childhood is perverse. No kid ever thought he/she was born in the wrong body until some screwed up adult put the thought in their head. Your latent pedophilia needs to be addressed.

With MAGA bros like yourself, accusation is often projection.

But thanks for confirming that you cannot name a SINGLE detransitioner who had gender dysphoria in early childhood.

Public service announcement, transwomen, get screenings for testicular cancer and get your prostate checked.

Former transwomen athletes have parlayed their talents into posting bad art and selfie modeling photos shot in their apartment kitchen on Instagram. These seem to be the preferred careers for these women, caught up in a woman’s world.