LRC “interviews” Shelby about burrito defense and doping

Just hear to say I enjoyed the interview and appreciated Shelby answering the hard questions.
Also didn’t feel like she was let off easy - for example Jon’s follow-up question asking her how she’d explain the isotope findings pushed back on what had otherwise sounded like a convincing argument in the prior 5 minutes

it was stupid to even interview Shelby. The only question worth asking is the one that she refuses to answer truthfully - where did the nandrolone come from? She know she will say she doesn't lnow.

So what's the point of the interview? She continues to lie about the truth.

Why even give her the platform to spread more lies? I have more respect for Marion Jones because she admits she was doping now.

Marion Jones didn't take nandrolone because Victor Conte knew the detection time is very long. It's the worst choice of steroid to evade tests. Jones used a then-unknown steroid called "the clear."

No, what I’m saying is, “Not a single one of those five items would be necessary to get a positive test from her meal.” I’m happy to discuss one item at a time.

As I’ve stated many times, both sides were speculating based on virtually no research. Nothing wrong with speculating (I do it too sometimes), but simply speculating on five bullet points does not make an authoritative argument, in my opinion.

In an earlier post, I showed how Ayotte testified one way at a hearing in 2019 and just two days later completely contradicted her testimony at another hearing with different arbiters. The point was not only to show less than honest testimony, but also the tendency of arbiters to uncritically accept whatever BS is pumped out by “prosecution” witnesses. Prior to that post, I provided information on a WADA lab manipulating evidence for a CAS hearing and when caught they went after the advertisers of the periodical rather than addressing the issue.

I’m not saying that the “prosecution” witnesses are *always* spewing nonsense or that there are no intentional dopers or that I have a psychic ability to know that Shelby did or didn’t dope intentionally.

Come on! Not one reply regarding the, “During the hearing, two expert hot tubs were held….” in item 37 in the CAS report!? I thought it was funny, but maybe other downloads are showing something different.

OK twoggle/rekrunner, how can a beef burrito really be a pork offal burrito?? wtaf?

Exactly which item # are you referring to? Item #1 (She must have been given the wrong order)?

It could easily happen if she got someone else's order. It wouldn't be the first time in history a server made a mistake.

That's what the up arrows are for. Rather than laid back and relaxing, do you think a heated exchange made the tub hot?

Almost there. No one knows, not the AIU, not the CAS, and not the public.

Not sure what you are trying to do here. The issue with nandrolone detection is not steady state, but a peak after first pass filtering.

In trials, it took 2.5 µg to exceed WADA's threshold, and 5 µg to exceed Houlihan's levels.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/DF312DD1F100E82815D7660F8CDB7FA4/S0029665108000487a.pdf/supplement-contamination-detection-of-nandrolone-metabolites-in-urine-after-administration-of-small-doses-of-a-nandrolone-precursor.pdf

She had an adequate excuse, an excuse proven by science, but was unable to prove it.

She could meet several criteria, in principle, if we give the athletes the benefit of the doubt, rather than a set of unfavorable presumptions.

What is your source for 99% then? You still failed to say.

How many fingers do you have on one hand? You still failed to say.

If you look into her case, Decker was treated much worse, because the harmonization under WADA and USADA didn't exist, permitting the IAAF to "retry" her "de novo", or double-jeopardy. It reaked of a power grab by the international federation over the national organization.

But ultimately it boiled down to the same argument and burden for the athlete to prove the science was wrong. Shortly after Slaney was convicted on the strength of the science being right, the scientists determined the science was wrong, and improved the testing to avoid false positives from the unreliable test.

Couldn’t even finish the interview. Sure they asked some good questions but no follow up just accepted what bullsh*** she was spewing. We’re supposed to believe she had a batch of vitamin d tainted with steroids???? This is absolutely laughable. Shes clearly not very bright. And JG bless his soul is so naive and wants to believe her, sad.

This just confirms that the reason you're not banned is because you know brojos in real life. And as always you're biased. Makes sense.

You say, "Not a single one of those five items would be necessary to get a positive test from her meal.” , then you say item one had to happen. You keep contradicting yourself/having a conversation with yourself and two other posters who are seemingly also you . You're are either under the influence or english isn't working for you, or both, because it's all gibberish. You and your alter egos are backtracking to the ridiculous series of events that were nearly impossible, and Foolagain just kept on digging... .

She didn't even get beyond the contaminated food theory. now she's throwing the birth control Hail Mary in there, and the "naturally higher levels of nandro" bs in there, even though it was synthetic nandrolone (see Floyd Landis). Also having six months, then asking for 7 days, to do her research with her Big Dollar Flex Lawyer , then acting like she only had 7 days is super dishonest. She, like, doesn't seem very bright, but she did higher the primo lawyer so that can't be an excuse.

You're right. What I said doesn't really make sense unless it was very slow release. I just have a lot on my mind like job and family. 🙂