What would Hicham El Guerrouj have run if he used EPO / other drugs?

rekrunner wrote:

Thomas Tesla wrote:

Though they speak with obtuse and metaphysical words, both Khamis and the aptly named King of Physics are correct in their musings.

I can categorixally state that the legend El G was 100% clean, with a pure and natural upbringing in Berkane, Morocco that beneditted from zero elektromagnetic interference.

The Rekrunner with his scientific illiteracy is not the man to pronounce on who is clean and who is dirty.

No one is the man to pronounce who is clean and who is dirty. There is always a chance that any athlete is dirty.

fhgf wrote:

Obvi. Rekrunner is a self declared code 🐒,, sorry, program developer, not a scientist.

rekrunner wrote:

Thomas Tesla wrote:

As late as 2005 THERE WERE NO MOBILE PHONES IN THE VIRGIN LAND OF MOROCCO TO CAUSE ELEKTROMAGNETIC DISTURBANCES IN THE HUMAN CAPILLIRIES!!

Furthermore in Morocco to this day only the rich can afford microwave OVENS THUS SPARING THE INNOCENT POPULACE OF ELEKTROMAGNETIC FIELD DISTURBANCE IN THE PULMONARY SYSTEM!!!

Rekrunner cannot see that El G's upbringing was completely unlike an athlete such as Jakob, and that he had no need for drugs.

Mobile phones entered the country in 1997. In 2000, Morocco had 2.55 million mobile phone subscribers. In 2006, 16 million. In 2007, around 20.5 million, or two-thirds of the population.

I can't see that any healthy athlete has any need for drugs.

fhgf wrote:

Lol! Even worse, he said he worked on 🛰 📡 🛰 - he is probably 👀 👀 you from up there right now. Better watch out!

fhgf wrote:

Thanks for the homework, boomer.

Aren't you too old to call googling *research*, having been in college in 1983?

Nmd I found it, and was correct. Only you called it "software engineer by education and trade", not software developer...

I'm sure you'll give me a long speech now about the (made up and irrelevant) difference between a software engineer and a software developer. Knock yourself out!

The King of Physics wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

No one is the man to pronounce who is clean and who is dirty. There is always a chance that any athlete is dirty.

Just as there is a chance that you are a doping sympathizer!

The King of Physics wrote:

fhgf wrote:

Obvi. Rekrunner is a self declared code 🐒,, sorry, program developer, not a scientist.

Didn’t know that rekbot is a software developer?

I know a few developers working for cybersecurity.

The King of Physics wrote:

Rekbot is a doping denier so he intentionally sets the bar for doping criterion unreasonably high so that nobody may be able to meet those standards which would then allow him to claim there are no doping and doping benefits.

rekbot does require unreasonable proof of the future which is why he is clearly pro doping.

rekrunner wrote:

The King of Physics wrote:

Just as there is a chance that you are a doping sympathizer!

No chance. If you can show me a proven doper, I will be among the first ones to say he/she should be punished to the full extent of all applicable codes and laws.

rekrunner wrote:

The King of Physics wrote:

Rekbot is a doping denier so he intentionally sets the bar for doping criterion unreasonably high so that nobody may be able to meet those standards which would then allow him to claim there are no doping and doping benefits.

rekbot does require unreasonable proof of the future which is why he is clearly pro doping.

Who is "rekbot"?

Speaking as "rekrunner", I can affirm that doping exists, and has existed for centuries, if not millenia. Nevertheless, I encourage all athletes worldwide, all time, at all levels, to be the best that they can be, without resorting to cheating, or violating any of their anti-doping obligations.

rekrunner wrote:

The King of Physics wrote:

Didn’t know that rekbot is a software developer?

I know a few developers working for cybersecurity.

Note for the future, I am neither a "self declared code 🐒" nor "self declared program developer,", nor for that matter, any iteration of "rekbot".

By degree, I have a Bachelor and Master of Science degree, and by training for cybersecurity, I followed a CISSP (Certified Information Systems Security Professional) training course (for managers), and I passed a 6-hour written exam on the first attempt.

If there is further interest, I can also provide my hobbies.

The King of Physics wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

Who is "rekbot"?

Speaking as "rekrunner", I can affirm that doping exists, and has existed for centuries, if not millenia. Nevertheless, I encourage all athletes worldwide, all time, at all levels, to be the best that they can be, without resorting to cheating, or violating any of their anti-doping obligations.

Im not sure if that is your belief or your lack of belief. And that’s the problem.

The King of Physics wrote:

rekrunner wrote:

No chance. If you can show me a proven doper, I will be among the first ones to say he/she should be punished to the full extent of all applicable codes and laws.

Laughable comment. No point pressing the issue further, only Khamis can take you to task about your hypocrisy.

rekrunner wrote:

The King of Physics wrote:

Im not sure if that is your belief or your lack of belief. And that’s the problem.

That is your problem, having nothing to do with me or my posts. I have never said nor implied that any athletes should choose to dope against any applicable rules.

rekrunner wrote:

The King of Physics wrote:

Laughable comment. No point pressing the issue further, only Khamis can take you to task about your hypocrisy.

He talks about a hypocrisy that others have fabricated, again, having nothing to do with me and my posts. It is his inferior approach that makes him so gullible to unfounded fabrications.