I've got you riled. That's enough. You can never let it go.
For sure it's enough for you to destroy thread after thread.
You don't have any interest in any arguments which destroy your view on something. How many times do you have agreed when it was shown that you were wrong on something in this forum? Just once?
You don't prove I am wrong about anything. Nor do the idiots you agree with. But you sure let it get to you.
For sure it's enough for you to destroy thread after thread.
You don't have any interest in any arguments which destroy your view on something. How many times do you have agreed when it was shown that you were wrong on something in this forum? Just once?
You don't prove I am wrong about anything. Nor do the idiots you agree with. But you sure let it get to you.
For sure it's enough for you to destroy thread after thread.
You don't have any interest in any arguments which destroy your view on something. How many times do you have agreed when it was shown that you were wrong on something in this forum? Just once?
You don't prove I am wrong about anything. Nor do the idiots you agree with. But you sure let it get to you.
Hey, the Dumb managed some posts to be removed which expose some of his imbalances.
A normal poster just would agree when it's obvious he was wrong on something. And would continue with the new knowledge. Not so our letsdumber no. 1.
Just the extremely simple point again: For Dumbstrong being close to a current WR is a 100% indication the athlete in question is a doper. But for Coe he is very uncertain despite the fact that Coe IS very close to a current WR (with a performance set 42 YEARS AGO). (if Coe is not close to the WR, in many events nobody is close)
But he is not able to just change his obviously wrong view on the subject.
And this exactly is the problem for any of his HUNDREDS of fights in letsrun. Just accept when being wrong - and continue with the discussion. But he doesn't - never. NEVER.
You don't prove I am wrong about anything. Nor do the idiots you agree with. But you sure let it get to you.
Hey, the Dumb managed some posts to be removed which expose some of his imbalances.
A normal poster just would agree when it's obvious he was wrong on something. And would continue with the new knowledge. Not so our letsdumber no. 1.
Just the extremely simple point again: For Dumbstrong being close to a current WR is a 100% indication the athlete in question is a doper. But for Coe he is very uncertain despite the fact that Coe IS very close to a current WR (with a performance set 42 YEARS AGO). (if Coe is not close to the WR, in many events nobody is close)
But he is not able to just change his obviously wrong view on the subject.
And this exactly is the problem for any of his HUNDREDS of fights in letsrun. Just accept when being wrong - and continue with the discussion. But he doesn't - never. NEVER.
The only thing unbalanced here are your posts. An endlessly stuck record.
Hey, the Dumb managed some posts to be removed which expose some of his imbalances.
A normal poster just would agree when it's obvious he was wrong on something. And would continue with the new knowledge. Not so our letsdumber no. 1.
Just the extremely simple point again: For Dumbstrong being close to a current WR is a 100% indication the athlete in question is a doper. But for Coe he is very uncertain despite the fact that Coe IS very close to a current WR (with a performance set 42 YEARS AGO). (if Coe is not close to the WR, in many events nobody is close)
But he is not able to just change his obviously wrong view on the subject.
And this exactly is the problem for any of his HUNDREDS of fights in letsrun. Just accept when being wrong - and continue with the discussion. But he doesn't - never. NEVER.
The only thing unbalanced here are your posts. An endlessly stuck record.
The only thing unbalanced here are your posts. An endlessly stuck record.
I just pointed on one of your countless mistakes.
It is only a mistake to one who can't follow a discussion. I am not saying all previous world record-holders are doping (do you think I was referring to Nurmi?) but that anyone who is getting near the present records today is likely doping. I may be right. You, on the other hand, cannot prove I am wrong. But you are wasting your breath on going over and over this point, as one who is obsessed with the passage of an ant over a sideboard.
This post was edited 29 seconds after it was posted.
It is only a mistake to one who can't follow a discussion. I am not saying all previous world record-holders are doping (do you think I was referring to Nurmi?) but that anyone who is getting near the present records today is likely doping. I may be right. You, on the other hand, cannot prove I am wrong. But you are wasting your breath on going over and over this point, as one who is obsessed with the passage of an ant over a sideboard.
Watching an ant is much more interesting than reading any of your almost 25,000 posts.
But it's fun watching you waste your life like this. Keep up the good work 🍿
It is only a mistake to one who can't follow a discussion. I am not saying all previous world record-holders are doping (do you think I was referring to Nurmi?) but that anyone who is getting near the present records today is likely doping. I may be right. You, on the other hand, cannot prove I am wrong. But you are wasting your breath on going over and over this point, as one who is obsessed with the passage of an ant over a sideboard.
Watching an ant is much more interesting than reading any of your almost 25,000 posts.
But it's fun watching you waste your life like this. Keep up the good work 🍿
So you have read my "25,000" posts. I have never had a more devoted follower. But you aren't wasting your time, are you?
It is only a mistake to one who can't follow a discussion. I am not saying all previous world record-holders are doping (do you think I was referring to Nurmi?) but that anyone who is getting near the present records today is likely doping. I may be right. You, on the other hand, cannot prove I am wrong. But you are wasting your breath on going over and over this point, as one who is obsessed with the passage of an ant over a sideboard.
I have never said what you are writing here, Dumby.
Anybody close to a current WR holder is a doper, that's what you have written, and that's what I have written several times now. But even 10 times would be not enough for you, you still would be misquote it completely.
If your statement would be true (it isn't, but just if) Coe would be a doper. But you are uncertain about this.
You are right here, it's a complete waist of time to try to discuss something with you. You can't understand the most simple points.
With rational posters on the level of a 10 years old such a point would be clarified in minutes. With you it's not clarified after weeks and dozens of posts.
If you are not sure that Coe is a doper, than your statement is false, an athlete can be close to a current WR without doping.
It is only a mistake to one who can't follow a discussion. I am not saying all previous world record-holders are doping (do you think I was referring to Nurmi?) but that anyone who is getting near the present records today is likely doping. I may be right. You, on the other hand, cannot prove I am wrong. But you are wasting your breath on going over and over this point, as one who is obsessed with the passage of an ant over a sideboard.
I have never said what you are writing here, Dumby.
Anybody close to a current WR holder is a doper, that's what you have written, and that's what I have written several times now. But even 10 times would be not enough for you, you still would be misquote it completely.
If your statement would be true (it isn't, but just if) Coe would be a doper. But you are uncertain about this.
You are right here, it's a complete waist of time to try to discuss something with you. You can't understand the most simple points.
With rational posters on the level of a 10 years old such a point would be clarified in minutes. With you it's not clarified after weeks and dozens of posts.
If you are not sure that Coe is a doper, than your statement is false, an athlete can be close to a current WR without doping.
For sure your statement IS false.
You have got stuck on the only part of the argument you think you understand. You don't. You have just shown it - again - despite an attempt to correct your lack of comprehension. But you don't want to understand. You are obsessed with trying to prove I must be wrong. You fail, because you insist on telling me what I meant. I think I know that better than you. Actually, anything better than you.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.