usababy wrote:
He was found guilty in a court of law. Why should people feel sorry for him. Don't do the crime if you can't serve the time!
courts are pretty bogus places to determine facts.
usababy wrote:
He was found guilty in a court of law. Why should people feel sorry for him. Don't do the crime if you can't serve the time!
courts are pretty bogus places to determine facts.
more comfortable wrote:
For starters, Salazar was already serving a doping ban in which no actual doping violations were proven to have occurred.
Secondly, he is now banned for life by a secret process and the accusations are from anonymous plaintiffs.
Isnt this what we wanted? Go all in on the darn doping people especially coaches? Its unfair, but appropriate. Unfair only because more people should get lifetime bans. There is little deterant to doping so far. It really hasnt changed much in decades. Oh yea, and he is dirtbag for the body shaming and all that. Pretty twisted. You can buy in to the professional way of life without all that BS he did.
Everybody at Nike knew all about him and told many sub elite and potential elite runners to flat "stay away from that guy " some of us listened and some didn't.
Second testing PED'S on your child is immoral and cheating !
Finally, fat shaming elite women went on at Oregon and Athletics West and Alberto was right there to witness it all, He learned from masters that keeping the women thin was the best way to make them fast even if it endangered their health.
Would you trust your child to this man ? thought so
Agree. Meanwhile, Jerry and Shalane skate free while their athlete gets busted with a ped.
Gwalkerruns wrote:
Agree. Meanwhile, Jerry and Shalane skate free while their athlete gets busted with a ped.
Why do you think that is?
Anyway, Alberto Salazar has never received any punishment that he didn’t absolutely deserve.
boomer99 wrote:
usababy wrote:
He was found guilty in a court of law. Why should people feel sorry for him. Don't do the crime if you can't serve the time!
courts are pretty bogus places to determine facts.
Was no court.
Finally, fat shaming elite women went on at Oregon and Athletics West and Alberto was right there to witness it all, He learned from masters that keeping the women thin was the best way to make them fast even if it endangered their health.
Can you name a few women "fatter" than Mary Cain was who are faster than she was?
Alberto is a lightning rod in the sport and on this board.
original liar soorer wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Not true. His doping infractions are on record and his abuses of young athletes are the result of an official investigation of which both he and the athletes concerned would be informed. To protect the athletes their identities and the details of their allegations are not made public but if the SafeSport findings are wrong they can be appealed, which Salazar has already done - unsuccessfully - and could also be taken to a court of law. I don't know of any SafeSport finding that has been so appealed, and overturned. So we have coach who has broken the anti-doping rules and been accordingly banned and now been found through an official inquiry to have treated some of his young female charges in a fashion deemed abusive. You might wish to know more of the details but that doesn't mean he has been treated unfairly. Only a successful appeal could show that. It won't happen.
So no body knows in the public sphere about the safe sport matter.
That includes everybody on this thread who insists he has been treated unfairly. They are defending Salazar without knowing the facts of the individual complaints against him. But SafeSport is simply doing what it has been set up to do for years, to deal with cases involving the abuse of minors in sport. No one has shown those accused - including Salazar - have been treated unfairly. If it is a question of integrity I would back SafeSport over Salazar any day.
Armstronglivs wrote:
original liar soorer wrote:
So no body knows in the public sphere about the safe sport matter.
That includes everybody on this thread who insists he has been treated unfairly. They are defending Salazar without knowing the facts of the individual complaints against him. But SafeSport is simply doing what it has been set up to do for years, to deal with cases involving the abuse of minors in sport. No one has shown those accused - including Salazar - have been treated unfairly. If it is a question of integrity I would back SafeSport over Salazar any day.
You mistake asking questions about a secret process as supporting Salazar. You keep getting told this just like you kept having to be told that the bladder was not part of the digestive system and about racial phrases you repeated using.
jedetestejoe wrote:
Alberto is a lightning rod in the sport and on this board.
I think the BroJos should make Salazar a mod.