Official LRC Kamala Harris for President Thread

Non-Running Politics

Moderation Moderation Information Moderation Information & Rules

Page 681 of 1,459

1 680 681 682 1,459

1 year ago 09/10/2024 4:31pm EDT

re: Women for Trump

While Rs campaign on made up stories of pets being eaten by immigrants, Dems keep people alive. And fight off Rs trying to kill more Americans.

You're welcome, rubes. You are welcome.

Barack Obama
@BarackObama
50 million people have now gotten health care coverage thanks to the Affordable Care Act. That’s something we’ll always be proud of.
Health care is not, and never will be, a privilege — it’s a right. And I'm grateful for the work that Joe and Kamala continue to do to improve the ACA to make it more affordable and effective for everyone.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 4:37pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
While Rs campaign on made up stories of pets being eaten by immigrants, Dems keep people alive. And fight off Rs trying to kill more Americans.
You're welcome, rubes. You are welcome.
Barack Obama
@BarackObama
50 million people have now gotten health care coverage thanks to the Affordable Care Act. That’s something we’ll always be proud of.
Health care is not, and never will be, a privilege — it’s a right. And I'm grateful for the work that Joe and Kamala continue to do to improve the ACA to make it more affordable and effective for everyone.

Republicans called this communism too.

Commies are everywhere!

1 year ago 09/10/2024 4:52pm EDT

re: Tea party Trevor

Harris' campaign is risking a Hilary Clinton redux with a very wishy washy campaign on policy and hoping that voters will pick Harris because Trump is a bad guy. With Clinton, they thought the "grab her by the p-word", sex scandals, etc. would bring down Trump. With Harris, she thinks that Jan 6 and Trump being Trumpy is going to get enough voters to swing the election. The problem is that Trump has been extra Trumpy of late and no one really cares. Harris may be squandering her big initial bump lead by her K-hive online by not galvanizing support with big policy ideas.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:11pm EDT

re: Ohh Whore

Ohh Whore wrote:
Women for Trump wrote:
I currently see Trump at 52.0% and Kamala at 46.0% on polymarket (I know it doesn't add up to 100%).
I can see it moving to Trump 55.5% and Kamala 42.5%.
Math usually takes a backseat when people are making up statistics to tell a story

polymarket.com

Polymarket - 2024 Presidential Election Predictions

@PolymarketHQ

2024 Presidential Election Predictions. Trust markets, not presidential polls. Live and accurate forecasts by the world's largest prediction market.

Open link

Polymarket has exactly the numbers Women for Trump posted.

Explain your comment please

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:13pm EDT

re: Precious Roy

Precious Roy wrote:
Harris' campaign is risking a Hilary Clinton redux with a very wishy washy campaign on policy and hoping that voters will pick Harris because Trump is a bad guy. With Clinton, they thought the "grab her by the p-word", sex scandals, etc. would bring down Trump. With Harris, she thinks that Jan 6 and Trump being Trumpy is going to get enough voters to swing the election. The problem is that Trump has been extra Trumpy of late and no one really cares. Harris may be squandering her big initial bump lead by her K-hive online by not galvanizing support with big policy ideas.

it's hard to say that indie or 'maybe I'll vote, maybe I won't' Americans want a wonky Democrat full of 'we're here from Washington to help you.' If you want policy you are already a voting Democrat. The goal is to get indies and low-knowledge Dems to show up. And maybe even a few Republicans utterly disgusted with Don Epstein. The Rs certainly will not be attracted by Dem policy. Repelled by it.

I don't think a big policy could galvanize those three groups. They are not Democrats. They want something else. Harris thinks its normalcy, moderation, joy, fun, pointing out trump's faults, etc. Seems like a decent bet to me.

Harris does have a full policy page with loads of policy, by the way.

kamalaharris.com

A New Way Forward - Kamala Harris for President: Official Campaign Website

Vice President Harris and Governor Walz are fighting for a New Way Forward that protects our fundamental freedoms, strengthens our democracy, and ensures every person has the opportunity to not just get by, but to get ahead.

Open link

My read on the situation is that this is a change election so the swing voters just want something new and exciting. Trump is exciting. Policy is not to them.

This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:16pm EDT

re: Tea party Trevor

Tea party Trevor wrote:
agip wrote:
While Rs campaign on made up stories of pets being eaten by immigrants, Dems keep people alive. And fight off Rs trying to kill more Americans.
You're welcome, rubes. You are welcome.
Barack Obama
@BarackObama
50 million people have now gotten health care coverage thanks to the Affordable Care Act. That’s something we’ll always be proud of.
Health care is not, and never will be, a privilege — it’s a right. And I'm grateful for the work that Joe and Kamala continue to do to improve the ACA to make it more affordable and effective for everyone.
Republicans called this communism too.
Commies are everywhere!

It's a give away to the Insurance companies

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:18pm EDT

re: Newname

Newname wrote:
Ohh Whore wrote:
This election is between a multiple convicted sex offender rapist and a tough-as-nails female DA who has dedicated her life to putting away that scum.
Fake allegations about someone who's not even is the race hava about as much relevance as when your wife promises nothing happened with her personal trainer when they shared a hotel room at the race you missed because you couldn't hit the qualifying time.
Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW_7DtPnYBs
DOJ big shot caught on film admitting they have been employing lawfare against Trump.
About 4.5 minutes in.

This was the thing that fishface lied about on page 663 at post #13248. I know you already know about it because you jumped in and said he didn't lie when he clearly did.

At least you didn't lie about anything. Characterizing a Manhattan office spokesperson as a "DOJ big shot" is an exaggeration, but it not a flat out factual lie. Similarly saying "they have been employing lawfare against Trump" is not necessarily a flat out lie, although it's a moving in the direction of the lie that fishface told. So you are to be commended from refraining from lying and just going to the threshold of the lie line that fishface crossed.

Papa Doc.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:22pm EDT

re: Newname

Newname wrote:
Tea party Trevor wrote:
Republicans called this communism too.
Commies are everywhere!
It's a give away to the Insurance companies

lol. oh you hate businesses now?

(pssst...who do you think pays for healthcare in the us)

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:28pm EDT

re: Ohh Whore

Ohh Whore wrote:
This election is between a multiple convicted sex offender rapist and a tough-as-nails female DA who has dedicated her life to putting away that scum.
Fake allegations about someone who's not even is the race hava about as much relevance as when your wife promises nothing happened with her personal trainer when they shared a hotel room at the race you missed because you couldn't hit the qualifying time.

She dedicated her life to servicing Willie Brown in more ways than one in order to become a DA. She also imprisoned casual weed smokers and got BLM rioters bailed out.

An ultra-Iibtard pollster, Marist just released this. It shows Cackles up by only one point. Her response bias/honeymoon is long gone. One point isn't winning the Electoral College.

YouTube.com

Trump SURGES as Dems PANIC & LIE Before Tonight's Debate!

Red Eagle Politics

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Watch on YouTube

Cackles is going to lose.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:31pm EDT

re: Jorgon

Jorgon wrote:
Newname wrote:
Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW_7DtPnYBs
DOJ big shot caught on film admitting they have been employing lawfare against Trump.
About 4.5 minutes in.
This was the thing that fishface lied about on page 663 at post #13248. I know you already know about it because you jumped in and said he didn't lie when he clearly did.
At least you didn't lie about anything. Characterizing a Manhattan office spokesperson as a "DOJ big shot" is an exaggeration, but it not a flat out factual lie. Similarly saying "they have been employing lawfare against Trump" is not necessarily a flat out lie, although it's a moving in the direction of the lie that fishface told. So you are to be commended from refraining from lying and just going to the threshold of the lie line that fishface crossed.
Papa Doc.

I noted comment #13428 said no such thing. I was dyslexic as I see it is comment 13248.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:32pm EDT

re: DumbNewName

DumbNewName wrote:
Newname wrote:
It's a give away to the Insurance companies
lol. oh you hate businesses now?
(pssst...who do you think pays for healthcare in the us)

Of course. Money for profits and admin should be going to providing healthcare

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:38pm EDT

re: Precious Roy

Precious Roy wrote:
Harris' campaign is risking a Hilary Clinton redux with a very wishy washy campaign on policy and hoping that voters will pick Harris because Trump is a bad guy. With Clinton, they thought the "grab her by the p-word", sex scandals, etc. would bring down Trump. With Harris, she thinks that Jan 6 and Trump being Trumpy is going to get enough voters to swing the election. The problem is that Trump has been extra Trumpy of late and no one really cares. Harris may be squandering her big initial bump lead by her K-hive online by not galvanizing support with big policy ideas.

Democrat strategist and former Senate aide Ray Zaccaro says people are extremely anxious about Kamala Harris’ debate performance, noting it could be “catastrophic or monumental.”- Leading Report on X

Open image

The ABC moderators are 100% in the tank for Kamala- it still will not be enough to save her.

#FTLH

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:42pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
Nnonequals wrote:
Rebuttals:
1) What is the president going to do about "woke stuff" across this huge country? The only direct control he has in the Executive branch. And what did he do to tame it at all the first time? I don't recall much, if anything. Second time, he either only trims it around the margins, or makes a real dent only by turning the whole federal bureaucracy into his sycophant kingdom. Which is, of course, far, far worse than the original "problem."
2) Abortion. Post-Dobbs, how much "better" is he going to make the situation for anti-abortion in a second term? And how much more would choice be advanced in a Harris administration? Easy to imagine that the answer to both questions is, "Not much."
I know the actual (and unfortunate) answer, but is it defensible for evangelicals to remain single issue (abortion) voters when they know that that issue won't change much either way, WHILE enduring a leader who THEY SHOULD regard as repulsive in so many other ethical, moral, and civil ways?
on wokeism, the WH has a good amount of influence on hot button topics. Remember when Obama sent a letter to the states saying biological boys must be allowed to use the girls' bathrooms? It's real. Obama did that and no way trump would do that.
By Caitlin Emma
05/12/2016 11:11 PM EDT
The Obama administration Friday morning took another historic step in its aggressive defense of civil rights, sending a letter to schools across the country notifying them that transgender students must be permitted to use bathrooms that align with their gender identity.
And of course Biden famously pushed Obama to accept same sex marriage as a piece of the Dem platform.
But Musk's argument is that 'wokeism' is making people choose obviously false things in order to be politically correct. Mostly around gender issues right now. Harris would keep that going, trump would at least slow it down.
On abortion...I think it's clear that a R president would try to eliminate abortions and have some success. This isn't much of an argument really. Through laws and $ and judges a R prez would have some success.

So, I guess that the rock-solid single issue evangelicals are left with this: If the more anti-abortion candidate appears to be the anti-christ (literally!), I will, in fact, vote for the anti-christ.

And since we don't fully know what Trump is capable of (did the Germans in 1933?), it MIGHT not be a super, super big exaggeration.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:44pm EDT

re: Jorgon

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:46pm EDT

re: Newname

Newname wrote:
Ohh Whore wrote:
Math usually takes a backseat when people are making up statistics to tell a story
Link:polymarket.com/elections
Polymarket has exactly the numbers Women for Trump posted.
Explain your comment please

The same 3 downvotes everytime I post

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:50pm EDT

re: agip

agip wrote:
Nnonequals wrote:
Rebuttals:
1) What is the president going to do about "woke stuff" across this huge country? The only direct control he has in the Executive branch. And what did he do to tame it at all the first time? I don't recall much, if anything. Second time, he either only trims it around the margins, or makes a real dent only by turning the whole federal bureaucracy into his sycophant kingdom. Which is, of course, far, far worse than the original "problem."
2) Abortion. Post-Dobbs, how much "better" is he going to make the situation for anti-abortion in a second term? And how much more would choice be advanced in a Harris administration? Easy to imagine that the answer to both questions is, "Not much."
I know the actual (and unfortunate) answer, but is it defensible for evangelicals to remain single issue (abortion) voters when they know that that issue won't change much either way, WHILE enduring a leader who THEY SHOULD regard as repulsive in so many other ethical, moral, and civil ways?
on wokeism, the WH has a good amount of influence on hot button topics. Remember when Obama sent a letter to the states saying biological boys must be allowed to use the girls' bathrooms? It's real. Obama did that and no way trump would do that.
By Caitlin Emma
05/12/2016 11:11 PM EDT
The Obama administration Friday morning took another historic step in its aggressive defense of civil rights, sending a letter to schools across the country notifying them that transgender students must be permitted to use bathrooms that align with their gender identity.
And of course Biden famously pushed Obama to accept same sex marriage as a piece of the Dem platform.
But Musk's argument is that 'wokeism' is making people choose obviously false things in order to be politically correct. Mostly around gender issues right now. Harris would keep that going, trump would at least slow it down.
On abortion...I think it's clear that a R president would try to eliminate abortions and have some success. This isn't much of an argument really. Through laws and $ and judges a R prez would have some success.

Thinking about it more, I think that it's less what POTUS can and can't do to influence woke stuff, but rather whether it's qualitatively important enough to trump other things? It's just not.

As you say, a view that you're "killing babies" is fairly hard to trump. But woke? Even if POTUS can influence woke significantly in either direction, it's just freakin' bogus to put that concern (bathrooms, drag....even affirmative active, which I largely dislike) over even a tiny fraction of what Trump represents. Am I willing to possibly lose a job to a clearly-less qualified black lesbian vegan witch if it means that we don't have a king? Of course.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:50pm EDT

re: Prime posters only

The Harris campaign is trying to claim they're underdogs even though they have the backing of former presidents, media, woke celebrities and cat ladies. They must see Trump as this unstoppable wrecking ball and they're the ones going to save democracy.🤣🤣 Harris is setting the bar low.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:52pm EDT

re: Newname

Newname wrote:
Polymarket has exactly the numbers Women for Trump posted.
Explain your comment please

Sure skippy. Try to see if you can understand this:

https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=13011625

The betting odds for the 1500m race in Zurich:
Ingebrigtsen: 1,45
Kerr: 2,75
Hocker: 11,0

Ingebrigtsen is/has been sick. I dont understand why Kerr is priced at 2,75. surely he should be the favourite?

Or this:

https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=12867948

Multiple bookmakers now offering odds on the Olympic 1500m:
Jakob 1.35 (~65%)
Kerr 3.5 (~25%)
Field (~10%)

Understand?

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:55pm EDT

re: Voting matters

Voting matters wrote:
Nnonequals wrote:
Reminds me of relativity. Easy to imagine W. Bush's teachers thinking, "Geez, not the brightest. Deserves a C or C-, but maybe I'll give him a B or B-."
Trump? "Holy sh**, this is the dumbest student I've ever had at Wharton. Deserves D's and F's. And I'm GIVING HIM an D's and F's !!!"
Hence, no transcripts, as I understand. But they're probably coming soon.
What you are doing is called conjecture. We don’t have to make assumptions to know that Biden finished near the bottom of his law school class and that Kamala went to law school through an affirmative action program and failed the bar exam on her first try. That is established.

I've heard the three of them speak. And him the most, and by a nearly infinite margin, the worst.

And I've heard cabinet members and other employees confirm how stupid/undisciplined/lazy he is. I've never heard that about Biden/Harris.

A very, very reasonable conclusion on my part.

1 year ago 09/10/2024 5:56pm EDT

re: Jorgon

A December 1995 clip from ABC Primetime shows a young Kamala Harris tethered to 61-year-old Willie Brown at his Mayoral election night party in San Francisco.

Reporter: “Are you his daughter?”
Kamala: “No I’m not.”

https://twitter.com/i/status/1833539430638096542

Page 681 of 1,459

1 680 681 682 1,459

Next Last

What People Are Talking About On LetsRun

No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

Official LRC Kamala Harris for President Thread

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.

Official LRC Kamala Harris for President Thread

Jump To A Page

Follow agip

Block agip

Follow Precious Roy

Block Precious Roy

Follow Newname

Block Newname

Follow agip

Block agip

Follow Newname

Block Newname

Follow Ghost of Disco Gary

Block Ghost of Disco Gary

Follow Newname

Block Newname

Follow Newname

Block Newname

Follow Ghost of Disco Gary

Block Ghost of Disco Gary

Follow Ghost of Disco Gary

Block Ghost of Disco Gary

Follow Newname

Block Newname

Follow Bagofsharks

Block Bagofsharks

Follow Ghost of Disco Gary

Block Ghost of Disco Gary

Jump To A Page

This thread has already been deleted.

Reply Replying to

You have been subscribed.