John Teeters 10.00

There have been about a dozen sub10.00 sprinters from Nigeria anyway.And a handful more from other westerm African countries. While we see hardly any from Asia, white Europe and the Middle East.

Ever notice the fastest...

Brit..black

Frenchmen...black

Asian...black

Canadian..black

USA...black

As we all know the African countries don't have an NCAA system lie we see in the USA. And are poor countries, places where track is low on the list of needs.

Blacks simply possess a more speed friendly physique and it's rel obvious. Then there's that size with speed.

Yes he is but he's really not fast by track standards. I doubt he's breaking 10.55 if that. He has good football speed.

the truth hurtz wrote:

Blood dEPOr wrote:

No. He's as clean as everybody else

You don't gain 20-30 pounds of muscle in a year, when you've been a serious athlete for several years already. That's literally impossible without the use of steroids. Building muscle takes a while. The only way you'll see gains like this is from people who have never really lifted before.

Good post. People really think building muscle is easy lol. Muscle building becomes a game of diminishing returns after a few years. From the looks of it teeters had been juicing since his high school days, like most sprinters. Gotta start em young

Too many variables as to why the fastest is black, but you have no credibility anyway sinve youre completely wrong on so many counts. The fastest Frenchman is not black, but a half-white, half-black. Vicaut dad is white. Close behind is of course Lemaitre.

Black speed is nonsense of course, and a great example is in the 60 meter run. Even faster than the 100. Out of the three guys that have run under 6.49 from African countries, only two are black. One Nigeria, one Ghana, and one from South Africa...Morne Nagel. How is it then that the fastest man in South Africa and one of the three fastest in all of Africa is white?? When there are so few there??

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Yes, I am. Earl was there the year or two before I go there. I ran there 1970-1973.

Are you South African?

r u retarted? wrote:

Too many variables as to why the fastest is black, but you have no credibility anyway sinve youre completely wrong on so many counts. The fastest Frenchman is not black, but a half-white, half-black. Vicaut dad is white. Close behind is of course Lemaitre.

Black speed is nonsense of course, and a great example is in the 60 meter run. Even faster than the 100. Out of the three guys that have run under 6.49 from African countries, only two are black. One Nigeria, one Ghana, and one from South Africa...Morne Nagel. How is it then that the fastest man in South Africa and one of the three fastest in all of Africa is white?? When there are so few there??

And guess what... Vivat is half black. The black genes matter. The fastest hs kid in USA Michael Norman is half Japanese, so what does that mean? He is half black. Blacks have the speed genes, it's just a fact

Who was the first Frenchman to run a sub10? Try Ronold Pognon, a black sprinter. How many white sprinters were on that French WR 4x21 team? Ypi have heard of Roger Bambuck, the only WR holding French sprinter ar 100m, yep, black.

You do know who the fastest 60 sprinters ever are, right?

And do you really think Vicaut would be running 9.8 if he 100% white, of course not.

Beleive what yout eyes are telling you, ok? Yes, when it comes to holding the..

HS 100,200, 400

NCAA 100, 200, 400

USA 100, 200, 400

World 100, 200, 400

...records, it will take black sprinters to do it. Then we have the relays.

Unfortunately your little premise is shot due to the fact that France has had hundreds of 100% black runners, yet the 1-2 runners are:

half white

all white

GTFO

So you haven't heard of Roger Bambuck, have you? Or that French WR 4x1 team.

I always find it funny when this topic comes up how some try so hard to ignore reality, why? They really can't figure this out? They haven't picked up on the obvious?

Where is that 225 pound 4.4 white RB, yep, they don't exist. Where is that 6-4 white speed receiver? Anyone here ever seen a white cornerback?

Clavin Von Zack wrote:

I always find it funny when this topic comes up how some try so hard to ignore reality, why? They really can't figure this out? They haven't picked up on the obvious?

Where is that 225 pound 4.4 white RB, yep, they don't exist. Where is that 6-4 white speed receiver? Anyone here ever seen a white cornerback?

This thread is getting silly. People refuse to accept facts. Blacks are the best sprinters, genetics matter. There's a reason why there are rarely any good black swimmers and weight lifters, and when's the last time you see blacks excel in intellectual fields? Genetics. Outliers exist but they are exception to the rule.

r u retarted? wrote:

Fat joe123 wrote:

And guess what... Vivat is half black. The black genes matter. The fastest hs kid in USA Michael Norman is half Japanese, so what does that mean? He is half black. Blacks have the speed genes, it's just a fact

Unfortunately your little premise is shot due to the fact that France has had hundreds of 100% black runners, yet the 1-2 runners are:

half white

all white

GTFO

Exceptions to the rule don't matter. For every quick non black sprinter, there's 10 blacks just as fast if not much faster.

No if he is on PED's it's fairly recent, or he has switched his PED regiment has he has gained tons of mass in a short time. There are videos of him from 2015 and he looked "slim".

I have no idea what motivates anyone to simply ignore the relities of this situation. They can't figure out that all the "great" sub 9.90 sprinters have been some % of black? They haven't noticed those quicks, agility, elusiveness we see from all those speedy, quick, elisive black footballers? They don't see that size with speed combo?

How could anyone not see what you and I see?

The 60m is NOT faster than the 100m (it is however shorter), if it was the case people would run the 100m under 6" just like people run the 100m under 10". Humans cannot reach their top speedover only 60m.The 100m World record is 9"58 which is 37.5 km/hthe 60m World record is 6"39 which is 33.8 km/h. 33"8 km/h over 100m would worth a time over 10"s.And the 60m was basically created to keep European Sprinters busy during the Winter. There is no Winter in tropical Africa, and I am not sure if their is a single indoor Arena or even an Indoor African T&F championships.

r u retarted? wrote:

Too many variables as to why the fastest is black, but you have no credibility anyway sinve youre completely wrong on so many counts. The fastest Frenchman is not black, but a half-white, half-black. Vicaut dad is white. Close behind is of course Lemaitre.

Black speed is nonsense of course, and a great example is in the 60 meter run. Even faster than the 100. Out of the three guys that have run under 6.49 from African countries, only two are black. One Nigeria, one Ghana, and one from South Africa...Morne Nagel. How is it then that the fastest man in South Africa and one of the three fastest in all of Africa is white?? When there are so few there??

The 60m is NOT faster than the 100m (it is however shorter), if it was the case people would run the 100m under 6" just like people run the 100m under 10". Humans cannot reach their top speed over only 60m.

The 100m World record is 9"58 which is 37.5 km/h the 60m World record is 6"39 which is 33.8 km/h. 33"8 km/h over 100m would worth a time over 10"s.

And the 60m was basically created to keep European Sprinters busy during the Winter. There is no Winter in tropical Africa,

and I am not sure if their is a single indoor Arena or even an Indoor African T&F championships.

Your sample size is Absolute ridiculous. 2 out 3 is 2/3, so a large majority.Morne Nagel is not even the fastest White S.African over 100m, he just put a lot of time training over the 60m distance because he was hopeless over 100m.

If I was as hypocritical than you I would say that out of the 4 European that have run a 60m under 6“48, none of them are White....

somedude wrote:

I have a feeling that the posters here who argue whites are slower than blacks in sprinting is due to environment rather than genetics are the same people that will say whites are more intelligent than blacks. genetically more gifted in intellectual manners.

basically, blacks are faster sprinters than whites. whites are smarter than blacks. Because of genetics.

You have to be kidding. The dumbest, most ignorant folks on the planet are white.

Clavin Von Zack wrote:

You got it. It's not that whites can't sprint, ir's about the fact they can't run that sub10.00 stuff. And if one does it's big news, where we expect any good black sprinter to break 10.00.

Those roots to western Africa is so obviously the difference.

Teeters needs to start running the 200m, his SE isn't where it should be and he also needs to lose about 10 pounds.

Just the opposite. Teeters best is at 60m -- Hell, 40m if they ever race that distance.

Crackhead1290 wrote:

Exceptions to the rule don't matter. For every quick non black sprinter, there's 10 blacks just as fast if not much faster.

I think what you really wanted to say was that for every steroid abusing non black sprinters, there's 10 steroid abusing blacks. Surely there could be many more really quick whites if they gave in to steroid abuse. There could be dozens of sub 10s, and some 9.5 outliers.