Rudisha time predictions for 100m through marathon

yep, the 60 is a sideshow.

A sideshow in which Rudisha would clock what time?

body master = Sprintgeezer = troll

Aghast wrote:

body master = Sprintgeezer = troll

Wrong, again.

Do I hear 6.72?

100 10.75

200 21.20

400 44.9

800 1:40.8 (i think he has another WR in him)

1500 3:38

3000 8:15

5000 14:40

10000 30:30

marathon 2:42

clearly rudisha is a rap up for the gold...does anyone think he can go sub 1:40?of course conditions would have to be perfect (weather,crowd,pace),but i don't see it to be impossible

Sprintgeezer wrote:

Jasari22 wrote:

No one cares about 60m. Its an irrelevant distance in relevant competitions.

Bullcrap.

It is VERY relevant to predicting 100m performance, which is patently relevant to this thread.

Furthermore, it is a very much better predictor of 100m performance than is 800m, 400m, or even 200m.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Regardless of whether or not there is anybody laughing at me, there is NOBODY laughing as hard as me, except for Body Master and probably coach d.

6.78!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do I hear 6.75?

ROTFLMAO

You are stupid because you are asking for a prediction for an event which is even further removed from his main event. You will then laugh at that prediction by extrapolating a 100 from it, which you will then claim is impossible. So you will waste our time refuting a prediction by extrapolating from a prediction you made. If you want a 60m time so badly, and the 60m and the 100m are so closely correlated than merely convert our predicted 100 times to 60 times and stop wasting our time.

Jesus the inability to recognise obvious trolls is ridiculous in here.

Saying Rudisha couldn't break 12 is as absurd as saying Rupp couldn't break 2 in an 800.

Oh look at this an 800 guy that has run 11.5

http://www.thepowerof10.info/athletes/profile.aspx?athleteid=21243

and he only runs 47 for 400m.

Rudisha makes the Kenyan 4x100 team if he wants to.

lol? 11.5 with no hundredth place? Obviously it was hand timed retard.

And you DO notice that he had no 800m clocking prior to that time? He was obviously a 400m runner A.k.A. a SPRINTER.

Then his 400m time gets slower by more than a whole second when he converts to the 800m.

Quit trolling.

body master--

Right on.

I have no problem believing that in 2006, as a 21.81 200m guy, he could have gone 11.50 in the 100, even as a FAT time--assuming that the 200m time was a FAT time.

I love how after that he doesn't even have any 200m times, how his 400m gets worse as he obviously transitions to 800m as his 800m times drop.

BEING A BETTER 800M RUNNER DOES NOT MAKE ONE A BETTER 100M SPRINTER.

If this guy was 11.50 in '06/'07, he was between 11.50 and 12.00 in 2012, closer to 12.00

A BIG THANK-YOU TO THE POSTER WHO LINKED TO THAT PROFILE.

mythbuster--

North Wales County Championships, hand-timed

http://www.thepowerof10.info/results/results.aspx?meetingid=6449&event=100&venue=Connah%27s+Quay&date=12-May-07

An 11.5 hand is evidence of nothing other than an 11.8 FAT, or a 12.0 FAT, if the timer wasn't great.

lol at all the failed sprinters that can't accept distance guys are faster than them. Give it up yeah.

http://www.thepowerof10.info/athletes/profile.aspx?athleteid=4261

Rudisha is sub 11. NO arguments. Done deal. Lock it up.

10.64 into a head wind bitches

http://www.iaaf.org/athletes/biographies/country=POL/athcode=204111/index.html

and that was the same year he was national junior cross country champ.

10.64 and xc champion in the same year. What a BEAST

So, because Lewandowski ran 10.6 while he ran 1:46.7, you conclude that Rudisha will run exactly WHAT, while he is running 1:41?

You still don't get it, do you? Lewandowski will be SLOWER than 10.6 at 100m while he is running 1:44, NOT FASTER.

BTW, I'm surprised that no Poles have broken 10 over the yars, they have an excellent mens sprinting history that nobody seems to know about.

Lewandowski is impressive, no doubt. But, he is not Rudisha.

So, by your logic, when I ran 10.4's, I could have run what time for 800m? Come on, let's hear it, and at the same time you tell me what Rudisha's 60m time would be.

This has nothing to do with logic. I've just provided facts. No logic is even needed to see that your full of horseshit.

An 800m guy runs 10.6 as a junior the same year that he is the xc champion. And you say that a far superior 800m guy, Rudisha, can't break 12.

I know your trolling but cmon man you gotta try harder than that.

Also lol at 60m. Not a real event at all.

That pretty much clears everything up. I'm outta here. Good luck with your future trolling attempts.

Regarding Lewandowski's performance record, it provides facts that nobody is disagreeing with, retard.

Regarding the rest of your trolling conjecture, c'mon man you gotta try harder than that.

That pretty much clears everything up. I'm outta here. Good luck with your future trolling attempts.

Do I hear 6.69?

Did you know that Rudisha can bench 350 and squat 450?

Rudisha dropped his 400m time by nearly 3 seconds during the time he dropped his 800m time by 10 seconds.

So, they might drop their 100m time at the same time as their 800m time.

2010 45.50 Sydney 27 FEB

2005 48.20 Arusha 11 MAY

800 METRES

PERFORMANCE WIND PLACE DATE

2012 1:40.91 London (OS) 09 AUG

2011 1:41.33 Rieti 10 SEP

2010 1:41.01 Rieti 29 AUG

2009 1:42.01 Rieti 06 SEP

2008 1:43.72 Oslo (Bislett) 06 JUN

2007 1:44.15 Bruxelles 14 SEP

2006 1:46.3 Nairobi 01 JUL

2005 1:51.2 Nairobi 15 JUN

Sprintgeezer wrote:

This is all hilarious.

There is no way Rudisha could break 12 seconds from blocks!

Seriously though, I would give him maybe 11.6...maybe.

No runner is runs slower over 400m than 100m

Can everyone stop talking about FAT times and all that crap

100m is 100m

Only if not a proper race, like with a flying start or relay do you need to elaborat

I would give him 10.9 and about 14:15 for 5km